E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Identification of Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths)

Community and ForumInsects identificationIdentification of Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths)

Pages: 1 ...771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779... 986

19.12.2016 15:13, Alexandr Zhakov

Good evening. Please identify this ... (leaflet?)
Filmed in Minvody on April 29.

The photo is cool, it would be better to have a little worse and in several angles. smile.gif
I get Cochylis atricapitana, but somewhat strange, used to more black and white without brown.
smile.gif
Likes: 1

19.12.2016 18:35, TEMPUS

Good evening. Is it possible to identify this moth? Sakhalin, 20.06.2016, flying in the shade of the Kuril bamboo in the afternoon.

Aethalura punctulata, if there is no similar local
Likes: 1

19.12.2016 18:37, Андреас

- Yes, here in general, in the extreme south of my northern Ciscaucasia (I constantly encounter) - even well-known species look like this - that at least kill yourself if "from photos")))

19.12.2016 20:01, Василий пенза

Please tell me satire, presumably eastern Kyrgyzstan.

Pictures:
picture: 1.jpg
1.jpg — (151.54 k)

19.12.2016 20:19, Андреас

Likes: 2

20.12.2016 1:10, Ольга Титова

  Aethalura punctulata, if there is nothing similar.

Yes, thank you, there are both Aethalura punctulata and Aethalura ignobilis on Sakhalin . And how to distinguish them?

20.12.2016 6:10, Bianor

Likes: 3

20.12.2016 7:29, Ольга Титова

Thank you, Alexander! Indeed, these two species are quite different in appearance. I identified my own as Aethalura ignobilis: dark triangles are clearly visible along the edge of the wings.
You once helped me identify another moth from an unimportant photograph - Pseudobaptria corydalaria (Graeser, 1889). Neither in the Sineva Catalog nor in the new year 2016 is it listed for Sakhalin. But this year it was quite numerous. Look, please, is she?

Pictures:
picture: DSC_0092________.jpg
DSC_0092________.jpg — (544.43к)

20.12.2016 7:53, Bianor

Likes: 1

20.12.2016 10:24, Ольга Титова

And God only knows now!!! This is about Aethalura.
Thank you for Trichodezia kindermanni (Bremer, 1864). On Sakhalin, it flies in the undergrowth and takes off on open paths warmed by the sun.

20.12.2016 11:51, Andrey Bezborodkin

Please tell me satire, presumably eastern Kyrgyzstan.

Well, if possible. Kyrgyzstan, then Ps. turkestana is nominative. With these, you always need both an undergarment and geography.
Likes: 2

20.12.2016 11:55, Василий пенза

- Maybe some kind of Pseudochazara?..

Undergarments are very desirable.

I also think that Pseudochazara, only what?

Pictures:
picture: _DSC7326.JPG
_DSC7326.JPG — (289.84к)

20.12.2016 14:25, Vlad Proklov

Please tell me satire, presumably eastern Kyrgyzstan.

And what are the options other than Pseudochazara turkestana?
Likes: 2

20.12.2016 21:53, Bianor

Likes: 2

20.12.2016 23:49, John-ST

Is it possible to identify the gelehida at least up to the genus?
16.09.2016
Moscow region, Zheleznodorozhny
[attachmentid ()=275864]

20.12.2016 23:53, TEMPUS

Is it possible to identify the gelehida at least up to the genus?
16.09.2016
Moscow Region, Zheleznodorozhny

Agonopterix, most likely propinquella (Elachistidae)

This post was edited by TEMPUS - 12/20/2016 23: 54
Likes: 1

21.12.2016 11:01, svm2

And God only knows now!!! This is about Aethalura.


I drew attention to the edge line (I will immediately make a reservation that I do not know the Far Eastern fauna), punctuation in my and available images on the Internet is dashes(if the line is visible), and ignobilis is more like dots, in available images on the Internet( again, if visible). At your-point, i.e., if the attribute works, then-ignobilis of two
Likes: 1

21.12.2016 12:54, Ольга Титова

Not even just dots, but in the form of triangles. Does punctuation have a dusting? It seems to me that in ignobilis it is stronger.

21.12.2016 14:15, Bianor

user posted image

Both ignobilis (top row) and punctulata have a spray pattern. In ignobilis, on average, it is stronger, in punctates it is weaker. Both types can have edge points, dashes, and triangles. The shape of the sling is also variable and is not a reliable sign. To reliably determine such a killed and punitively straightened specimen, it needs to be cooked.
If there are other specimens of this genus, show us if it will be possible to estimate your regional specifics of individual variability.
Likes: 1

22.12.2016 7:25, Ольга Титова

A single copy of Aethalura, got caught by accident. I didn't straighten it out, it's kind of unreliable, flimsy.
Actually, I try not to collect moths, but they find me on their own. Since I didn't collect enough of them in 2016, I'm trying to determine them. There will be something to look out for in the new season. Moreover, this is a daily find. But the only one.
I can send the genitals for cooking.
And, of course, I still wonder what's going on around here.

22.12.2016 18:33, Bianor

Then sign it as A. ignobilis - it looks more like it in terms of the set of features.
Sakhalin, by the way, has many interesting species from this family.
Likes: 1

23.12.2016 3:19, Ольга Титова

Rheumaptera subhastata or R. subhastata, 06.06.2016, Sakhalin? Both are specified for the island. I'm leaning towards the former.
Second moth 31.08.2016. At the end of August, at dusk, they flew out of the forest en masse and circled over a river or spring, but high, they managed to catch only one.

Pictures:
picture: DSC_0092______.jpg
DSC_0092______.jpg — (232.57к)

picture: DSC_0094____.jpg
DSC_0094____.jpg — (232.38к)

23.12.2016 6:09, Bianor

23.12.2016 9:48, Ольга Титова

I agree with Rheumaptera hastata. Thank you.

This post was edited by Olga Titova - 12/23/2016 09: 52

23.12.2016 9:51, Ольга Титова

"It's a very shabby butterfly."
If there are such people, should I send them off or leave them?

23.12.2016 13:28, Bianor

An instance has value as long as it can be accurately determined. You can accurately determine it as long as it has a belly. Here, for example, what butterflies can be in large, serious museums:
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbr...ge?taxid=158383
Some species, such as representatives of the genera Lomographa, Scopula, Asthena, Jodis and some others, in nature quickly turn into "small white moth", which outwardly can be difficult to determine even before the genus. Another thing is, if the goal is to create a visual aid, then already very shabby copies become useless.
Likes: 2

26.12.2016 20:25, coriander-lithurgus

Tell me, please, whether correctly defined hoods?
picture: K9YiI_croper_ru.jpeg 1. picture: EWbjA_croper_ru.jpeg 2.

27.12.2016 2:49, Ольга Титова

I can't deal with the dot on the right. August 2015, Sakhalin. Photographed with Angerona prunaria for proportionality. Please help me.

Pictures:
picture: DSC_0097____.jpg
DSC_0097____.jpg — (89.45к)

27.12.2016 4:57, Bianor

I can't deal with the dot on the right. August 2015, Sakhalin. Photographed with Angerona prunaria for proportionality. Please help me.

Moths are a complex group, even if they are spread out in appearance, it can be difficult to determine, and with folded wings only a finger in the sky:
http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Larentii...a_cambrica.html
Likes: 1

28.12.2016 15:42, Musson max

Good day!

Please help me dispel my doubts about Kukuli.

All these cuculias (1 (50 mm); 2 (48 mm); 3 (52 mm)) Cucullia lucifuga (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775)?

And, if possible, help with # 4 (41 mm)

Thank you in advance smile.gif

10-11. 06. 2015-Ukraine, Transcarpathian region, Khust district, outskirts of Shayan village. On light: 125 + 250 DRL

picture: Cuculia.jpg

picture: Cuculia_1.jpg

This post was edited by Musson max - 12/28/2016 15: 55

28.12.2016 17:09, svm2

Well, the first 3 in my opinion are umbratica all-tak
Likes: 1

28.12.2016 17:27, svm2

4-since it is too late for gozmanyi, it is most likely lychnitis, but for such a grated error probability is higher
Likes: 1

28.12.2016 19:26, Alexandr Zhakov

Tell me, please, whether correctly defined hoods?
1.
2.

Right. yes.gif
Likes: 1

28.12.2016 20:56, Oleg Nikolsky

Help me deal with the motley birds. My assumptions are as follows:

Z. viciae
1
picture: 5392_viciae. png
2
picture: 5396_viciae.jpg

Z. minos
3
picture: 5879_minos.jpg
4
picture: 5880_minos.jpg

Z. loti
5
picture: 6510_loti.jpg
6
picture: 7314_loti.jpg

Z. lonicerae
7
picture: 7141_lonicerae.jpg
8
picture: 7144_lonicerae.jpg
9
picture: 7151_lonicerae.jpg

Z. angelicae
10
picture: 7282_angelicae.jpg
11
picture: 7305_angelicae.jpg
12
picture: 7441_angelicae.jpg

This post was edited by Nolik - 01.01.2017 10: 58

29.12.2016 13:20, Ленинец

Tell me what kind of butterfly it is. South of Primorye
picture: ____1_.JPGpicture: ____2_.JPG

29.12.2016 19:03, Ilia Ustiantcev

Palpita nigropunctalis
Likes: 1

29.12.2016 19:37, МАК1995

Help us identify subspecies of butterflies. Caught 21.06.16 Kola Peninsula, Turiy Cape. Murmansk region.

Pictures:
picture: 20161229_190333_Richtone_HDR_.jpg
20161229_190333_Richtone_HDR_.jpg — (302.06к)

30.12.2016 0:02, insectamo

0be-MO, Orekhovo-Zuyevsky district, pos. Poplar, September 05, 2016
picture: 1.jpg
picture: 2.jpg

30.12.2016 0:11, Vlad Proklov

0be-MO, Orekhovo-Zuyevsky district, pos. Poplar, September 05, 2016

1-I will assume that Dioryctria simplicella
2-Psorosa dahliella/nucleolella, I do not know how to distinguish them by appearance. Yuzhnik.
Likes: 1

30.12.2016 1:14, Andrey Bezborodkin

Help us identify subspecies of butterflies. Caught 21.06.16 Kola Peninsula, Turiy Cape. Murmansk region.

The fauna of the Kola Peninsula is similar to that of northern Finland. It is hardly possible to talk about subspecies of what is in the photo, rather about species, or about the forms of P. napi. And in the Leptidea sinapis/juvernica complex, photos are not detected. Take a look here at all the whiteflies in the north. Of Finland:
http://perhoset.perhostutkijainseura.fi/hi...mo-pieridae.htm
Likes: 1

Pages: 1 ...771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779... 986

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.