Identification of Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths)

Community and Forum → Insects identification → Identification of Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths)

Pages: 1 ...869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877... 986

Likes: 1

03.08.2018 20:05, vidjl

And why suddenly skidding?So we have them here in the 17th region.

Because the nearest regions where it occurs are Transbaikalia, Primorye, Korea, Mongolia, and here again, the Orenburg region! The question arises, why such a torn area suddenly. This usually happens when, along with something, a pupa or caterpillar is accidentally imported from the habitat at the pupation stage, which in a new place safely pupates and a butterfly comes out, and you catch it, for example.

And then the small-leaved elm and the squat elm are the elm I mentioned.

See what fruit trees are there, too.

I'm in shock myself.There were several of them and the biotope was a floodplain meadow near the river.Caught on a tree in the shade resting like all katokals.

Maybe she was alone, and the others are other species of this genus, just flew together? Try catching more.

Likes: 1

03.08.2018 22:11, Kharkovbut

Where were you when I was in doubt
According to photos from nature, I don't really like to identify pigeons, but the person asked in the personal account, thank you for correcting me.

Let it be sp. according to you, but I still think that C. hyale, and P. alveus, comparing (according to this not very successful angle of course) and analyzing the list of what lives there, this is my definition, my point of view.
If you don't agree, let the ultimate truth speak through your mouth.

I was in the fields.

You don't like to define pigeons-why do you define them? Maybe it's more natural to act on the principle of "less is better, but better"?

As for kolias and pyrgus, of course, everyone has the right to a point of view, but it seems to me that it is better to be cautious (or not to define at all!) if clear signs are not visible, and the definition is based on intuition and something subjective. At least, it seems to me that in this case it ("in my opinion, ...") is worth mentioning, so as not to mislead people.

Likes: 2

04.08.2018 0:58, vidjl

I was in the fields. You don't like to define pigeons-why do you define them? Maybe it's more natural to act on the principle of "less is better, but better"?

As for kolias and pyrgus, of course, everyone has the right to a point of view, but it seems to me that it is better to be cautious (or not to define at all!) if clear signs are not visible, and the definition is based on intuition and something subjective. At least, it seems to me that in this case it ("in my opinion, ...") is worth mentioning, so as not to mislead people.

I agree, I agree with you, I respect the wisdom of older people! After all, you will be 100 years old next year, and what am I, I'm young, I haven't even lived up to fifty

dollars yet