Photocameras

Community and Forum → Insects photoshooting → Photocameras

Pages: 1 ...24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32... 42

Likes: 1

Likes: 2

31.12.2017 1:11, Юрий352

Happy New Year to all of you!!!

Another experiment (such as "macro").

It was made "in a hurry" from what is available.
"Macro system" consists of a ten-year-old Kodak Z1012 IS soap dish+ Lens from Zenith Helios44-2 (as an attachment lens) + a tube made from an aluminum beer can cut, rolled up to the desired diameter and cut to the required length (so that the soap dish lens does not stick into the "nozzle lens"), which is fixed with ordinary electrical tape (yellow-green) + a metal clamp (for mounting on the fixed part of the soap dish lens). The Helios44-2 lens is inverted.
The Kodak Z1012 IS has a 10MP sensor, it was experimentally established that 5MP is optimal for the lens of this camera (no more, I shoot on this setting).
The distance ( from the lens) to the stick rod is about 30-40mm ("by eye"

Two test images were not processed by external filters, only the size was reduced from 2592X1944 to 1024X768. The fragment in the corner is 100% .
user posted image

The second option: an Zenit tele-converter K-1(2-fold negative component) was added to the " nozzle lens "and the focus of the" nozzle lens " (Helios44-2) became about 116mm.
user posted image

This image has been corrected (by level).
user posted image

This "design" was used in the summer and for my modest tasks-it is quite suitable.
user posted image

This post was edited by Yuriy352-31.12.2017 01: 42

Likes: 2

31.12.2017 9:47, Бомка

Here are two other mirrorless sonki in Rostov-on-Don:
1. At 16Mpx and already with two lenses =10 tr. -
https://www.avito.ru/rostov-na-donu/fototeh...parat_952620971
2. At 20Mpx, with a VIEWFINDER and one lens = 7 t. p.
(in a store, shopping trip or pawnshop).
https://www.avito.ru/rostov-na-donu/fototeh...a3000_528677353

At the same time, you can take macro rings for NEX = 400 rubles.
https://www.avito.ru/rostov-na-donu/fototeh...a5000_669011974
or here for 850 rubles.
https://www.avito.ru/rostov-na-donu/fototeh...mount_810359802
And
buy adapters / adapters-
M39-E =450 rubles.
https://www.avito.ru/rostov-na-donu/fototeh..._nex_1001713325
---
m42-E =650 rubles.
https://www.avito.ru/rostov-na-donu/fototeh...y_nex_798906066
---
Canon-E = 690 rubles.
https://www.avito.ru/rostov-na-donu/fototeh...y_nex_829320663
---
Nikon-E = 750 p.
https://www.avito.ru/rostov-na-donu/fototeh..._nex_1176161705
---
Battery = 890 rubles.
https://www.avito.ru/rostov-na-donu/fototeh...-fw50_778960469
---
Macromech for macro photography of pzf M42 = 1500 rubles.
https://www.avito.ru/rostov-na-donu/fototeh..._m42_1049290590

This post was edited by Bomka - 31.12.2017 09: 53

Likes: 1

01.01.2018 1:05, ИНО

I also found this option: a Pentax k-30 carcass, the mileage is only 4 thousand, but the diaphragm drive does not work. In principle, with Soviet lenses, it's not worse for nafig,. but pochtitl on the forum that this is only a symptom of an incomprehensible sore, which with further development can affect the mirror and shutter, because all these cases are connected mechanically and work from one motor. Yes, and the DSLR is, that is, heaviness and a long working period. But the images from it, especially at high ISO, are much better than from any micra or even nex for my taste. But the screen is not rotating. And a lot of complicated mechanics that tend to die from the slightest sneeze. In fact, it is very strange why such things cost exactly the same as mirrorless cameras, which have only one shutter from moving parts, and, therefore, their production costs several times cheaper. I would like to throw the Pentax matrix along with the stub into the mirrorless case with a comfortable grip and EVI, while maintaining dust and moisture protection - I would definitely take such a camera even three times more expensive. But it is not found in nature.

02.01.2018 2:47, AVA

I also found this option: a Pentax k-30 carcass, the mileage is only 4 thousand, but the diaphragm drive does not work. In principle, with Soviet lenses, it's not worse for nafig,. but pochtitl on the forum that this is only a symptom of an incomprehensible sore, which with further development can affect the mirror and shutter, because all these cases are connected mechanically and work from one motor. Yes, and the DSLR is, that is, heaviness and a long working period. But the images from it, especially at high ISO, are much better than from any micra or even nex for my taste. But the screen is not rotating. And a lot of complicated mechanics that tend to die from the slightest sneeze. In fact, it is very strange why such things cost exactly the same as mirrorless cameras, which have only one shutter from moving parts, and, therefore, their production costs several times cheaper. I would like to throw the Pentax matrix along with the stub into the mirrorless case with a comfortable grip and EVI, while maintaining dust and moisture protection - I would definitely take such a camera even three times more expensive. But it is not found in nature.

Canon 6D Mark II

02.01.2018 14:26, Wave Storm

I watched the Fujifilm forum. Good cameras, beautiful photos. By weight, even less than the advanced Olympus and Panasonic. But their 60 mm macro lens (90 in 35 mm eq.) gives a magnification of 1:1, but 1:2. Another 80 mm macro lens (120 mm in 35 mm eq.) weighs 750 g. For comparison, the new version of the SLR Tamron (with stabilizer) weighs 550 g, and my Tamron (without stabilizer) weighs 405 g. And here's the price difference: the Tamron SP AF 90mm f/2.8 Di VC USD 1:1 Macro costs $ 650, and the Fujifilm XF 80mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro Lens costs $ 1200. This is even more expensive than the Panasonic Macrolake ($800). No, still, for amateur macro among mirrorless cameras, the micro 4/3 system with the Olympus M. Zuiko Digital ED 60mm f/2.8 Macro lens will be more profitable, which is sold for$ 500 and weighs only 185 g.

02.01.2018 16:50, Hierophis

The fact that with average incomes in our region, buying a specialized macro-project is, to put it mildly, consumerism, the meaning of which is questionable. If not as colorful, but acceptable results can be obtained using what is sold at flea markets, and especially considering that usually such things are bought just for lulz, and not for work.
From the fact that a plant or insect will be photographed through samopal, and not on a factory product-it is unlikely that the probability of determining the species from the photo will change much, for example, and if the application ends with this, then investments in both are not comparable with the effect of the final result)))
In addition, by buying an object, you are even more sponsoring the creepy West, don't forget about it

02.01.2018 17:27, Hierophis

This is your opinion, which is not always relevant to reality.

Omg

And then what is the purchase of a macro-objective?
In general, consumerism is the acquisition of things that cost radically beyond the limits of cash abundance, and which are not utilitarian, do not bring profit.
Buying something for pleasure is not consumerism, unless you have to take out a loan, sell a kidney, or eat only bread and water)))

It's one thing when a person has an income of, say, about $ 3,000 a month, he bought a makrik for $ 750, another thing if you buy this makrik with an income of 300 a month just to post a photo on a photo site

As an investment-also no, to sell in the secondary market of the object at the price of a new one is unlikely to come out, at least do not put on any protective filter, BOO it is BOO, and by themselves they become cheaper and in the primary market or even completely replaced by others.

And since when did Japan become outside the halo of Western civilization? ))Australia is generally on the other hemisphere-and also there