Moscow and the Moscow region

Today's Balashikha. Look at the beetles, eh?

http://kotbegemot.livejournal.com/533303.html

Vlad, and Ampedus sp. large (larger than 11mm)?

And again Chigasovo, Odintsovo district, Moscow region. While others make interesting finds in other places, I try to pick up something in the country.

For the first time, he collected T. emortualis and C. truncata moth. During the night, 3-4 Panthea coenobita arrived

Pictures:

IMG_3499.JPG — (127.89к)


IMG_3503.JPG — (154.54к)


IMG_3509.JPG — (278.26к)

June 25-27, 2010, MO, Ruzsky district.
In the image IMG_1033.jpg -a freshly hatched female iris.
In the image IMG_1141.jpg-iris, preparing for mating (on a goat willow).
Other male nymphalids, including vau-album.
In the image IMG_1179.jpg-a freshly laid iris egg (on a goat willow leaf).
Otherwise, almost nothing interesting. Is that still flying last year's io on the background of fresh lemongrass (both sexes are already flying). And very dubious individuals of xanthomelas are normal on the legs, and the white spot in the corner of the forewing is yellow, similar to the pattern of polychloros.
Dominula is common, both sexes, females are fresher. Hawthorn trees, usually abundant in these areas, are now very few in number. Limenitis populi departs, but one freshest female is also found. In the mass of stale Aphantopus hyperantus and Limenitis camilla. Admiral is rare (fresh), cardui is not numerous (flown in a hollow tree). There are almost no pigeons. From mother-of-pearl – tails of selenium and a few latonia. A male grass cocoonworm (potatoria) is sitting on a stump, although only a few caterpillars are still found. Of the pieris whiteflies, napi is common, rapae is rare, brassicae is rare; daplidice / edusa is rare, and sinapis / reali is rare. Of the draughtsmen, only athalia (common). One of the satyrs is the dying achine.
By the way. A female green woodpecker was found.

Pictures:

IMG_1033.jpg — (451.51к)


IMG_1043.jpg — (354.68к)


IMG_1049.jpg — (516.41к)


IMG_1050.jpg — (231.45к)


IMG_1059.jpg — (646.63к)


IMG_1060.jpg — (528.41к)


IMG_1064.jpg — (471.69к)


IMG_1085.jpg — (1.32 mb)


IMG_1092.jpg — (1.42мб)


IMG_1121.jpg — (2.15 mb)


IMG_1125.jpg — (2.07 mb)


IMG_1141.jpg — (1.27 mb)


IMG_1157.jpg — (1.66мб)


IMG_1179.jpg — (1.02 mb)


IMG_1186.jpg — (1.8 mb)


IMG_1190.jpg — (1.4 mb)


IMG_1196.jpg — (1.39мб)

Vlad, and Ampedus sp. large (larger than 11mm)?

No, less than.

No, less than that.

Well, then: Ampedus pomonae Stephens, 1830 (most likely).

Well, then: Ampedus pomonae Stephens, 1830 (most likely).

Vasily, ampeduses are not a genus that can be identified immediately from a photograph. There are quite a few options out there besides pomorum and pomone. They should be viewed at a decent magnification, the shape and density of the dotted line is of great importance...

In the night from 26 to 27 caught in Pestovo, Odintsovo district of Moscow region. It was a warm, windless night, but the weather was clear and the moon was full (it was a good thing the latter didn't rise much above the horizon). I still complain about the almost complete lack of interesting scoops. I didn't go much during the day, and I didn't find anything new in the swamp. In general, there are not many new species for me, but literally a couple of them are not just rare, but very rare. Also, at least three specimens of Oryctes nasicornis arrived at night.

Arctiidae
Atolmis rubricollis
Cybosia mesomella
Eilema depressa
Mitochrista miniata
Callimorpha dominula
Diacrisia sannio
Rhyparia purpurata
Spilosoma lubricipeda
Spilosoma lutea

Cosmopterigidae
Limnaecia phragmitella

Cossidae
Acossus terebra
Cossus cossus finally caught an imago

Crambidae
Cataclysta lemnata
Eudonia lacustrata
Evergestis extimalis
Eurrhypara hortulata
Loxostege sticticalis
Pleuroptya ruralis
Pyrausta despicata

Drepanidae
Drepana falcataria
Habrosyne pyritoides
Tethea or
Tetheella fluctuosa
Thyatira batis

Geometridae
Alcis repandatus
Apeira syringaria
Biston betularia
Cabera exanthemata
Cabera pusaria
Chiasmia clathrata
Deileptenia ribeata
Hylaea fasciaria
Hypomecis punctinalis
Hypomecis roboraria
Lomaspilis marginata
Lomaspilis opis
Macaria alternata
Macaria notata
Macaria wauaria
Ourapteryx sambucaria
Aplocera praeformata
Camptogramma bilineata
Electrophaes corylata
Epirrhoe alternata
Eulithis prunata
Eulithis pyropata
Eupithecia succenturiata
Gagitodes sagittata
Gandaritis pyraliata
Hydrelia flammeolaria
Mesoleuca albicillata
Rhinoprora rectangulata
Perizoma alchemillata
Perizoma flavofasciata
Scotopteryx chenopodiata
Spargania luctuata
Xanthorhoe montanata
Xanthorhoe quadrifasciata
Comibaena bajularia
Geometra papilionaria
Hemithea aestivaria
Thalera fimbrialis
Thetidia smaragdaria
Cyclophora albipunctata
Idaea aversata
Idaea biselata
Idaea dimidiata
Scopula immutata
Scopula nigropunctata

Hepialidae
Hepialus humuli

Lasiocampidae
Dendrolimus pini
Euthrix potatoria

Limacodidae
Apoda limacodes
Heterogenea asella-thanks to kotbegemot for the definition. This is the third discovery in the region!

Lymantriidae
Euproctis similis
Leucoma salicis

Noctuidae
Herminia grisealis
Herminia tarsicrinalis
Herminia tarsipennalis
Hypena proboscidalis
Rivula sericealis
Laspeyria flexula
Lygephila pastinum
Acronicta leporina
Acronicta tridens
Moma alpium
Deltote bankiana
Deltote uncula
Protodeltote pygarga
Abrostola triplasia
Autographa gamma
Autographa pulchrina
Diachrysia chrysitis
Diachrysia stenochrysis
Plusia putnami
Panthea coenobita
Pyrrhia umbra
Lacanobia oleracea
Lacanobia thalassina
Leucania comma
Mamestra brassicae
Melanchra persicariae
Mythimna impura/pallens
Mythimna turca
Polia bombycina
Apamea monoglypha
Apamea ophiogramma
Caradrina morpheus
Euplexia lucipara
Oligia latruncula
Oligia strigilis
Photedes minima
Pseudeustrotia candidula
Trachea atriplicis
Agrotis clavis
Agrotis exclamationis
Anaplectoides prasina
Cryptocala chardinyi
Diarsia brunnea
Noctua pronuba
Ochropleura plecta
Xestia ditrapezium

Nolidae
Pseudoips prasinana

Notodontidae
Notodonta dromedarius
Notodonta torva
Ptilodon capucina
Phalera bucephala
Pheosia gnoma
Gluphisia crenata

Pyralidae
Hypsopygia costalis

Sphingidae
Deilephila elpenor
Hyles gallii
Laothoe populi
Laothoe amurensis
Smerinthus ocellatus

Tineidae
Monopis monachella

Tortricidae
Archips rosana
Hedya salicella
Lathronympha strigana
Phtheochroa inopiana







This post was edited by Ilya U-06/28/2010 23: 04

Vasily, ampeduses are not a genus that can be identified immediately from a photograph. There are quite a few options out there besides pomorum and pomone. They should be viewed at a decent magnification, the shape and density of the dotted line is of great importance...

So I thought on sanguineus (from the Moscow region), But it is larger and quite rare. Why and the assumption expressed.

So I thought on sanguineus (from the Moscow region), But it is larger and quite rare. Why and the assumption expressed.

No, Vasily, Anthrenus is absolutely right: Ampedus(s) with a black pronotum and unicolored red (in various variations) elytra, even from pomonae to pomorum in the photo, is a thankless task to breed. Moreover, there are other similar species there. Here, without binoculars, there is a tube...

This post was edited by Dmitrich - 28.06.2010 20: 28

Despite the abnormal heat that has settled in the Moscow region, almost no one has flown anything super (with the exception of Ilya with his second type of slug-I really want to catch it too)... I am no exception, everything caught is commonplace. At the weekend, I caught on 83 km of the Yaroslavl highway, watched the pandemonium of dominoes on the screen (now they crowd in my box).

From Sunday to Monday in Moscow, in Ukhtomka, where at least a few barbels have arrived and yellow ribbons have already gone.




This post was edited on sdi-29.06.2010 16: 33

And what is this little sawyere on my cotton wool, no one can tell you?

And what is this little sawyere on my cotton wool, no one can tell you?

Similar to exocentrus kakogoto... I can't say

He is, lusitanus, rather all

He is, lusitanus, most likely

Is it even found on conifers?

No, on linden we have, mostly.

No, on linden we have, mostly.

yes we also have it on hardwoods but in tondema with A. rusticus and S. buprestoides somehow misleading

yes we also have it on hardwoods but in tondema with A. rusticus and S. buprestoides it is somehow misleading

Duc, it came to the light, and not taken from a tree .

I just returned from a trip to Serebryano-Prudsky district.
Look, be envious:

http://kotbegemot.livejournal.com/533597.html

Duc, he flew into the light, and not taken from a tree .

Oh, right... then everything fits)))

This night I finished off the first month of summer by catching the light from 10 pm to One o'clock in the morning on my balcony, at home.
It was a very good flight for the city. Especially pleased with the scoops, a rod like flies (you know what), but mostly the same thing.
Although we can distinguish Aedia funesta Esper, 1786 and Amphipyra pyramidea Linnaeus, 1758 (isn't it a little early?)
I was also pleased with some Noctua sp., some strelchatka? and the crested Pterostoma palpina? Please help me bring these three butterflies to mind .
In general, I was satisfied. For almost the city center .
I attach a photo of the straightener (below is a photo of three butterflies that I asked to deal with)

Pictures:

30.06_01.07.2010.jpg — (78.97к)


1.jpg — (211.52 k)


2.jpg — (234.65 k)


3.jpg — (251.68к)

This night I finished off the first month of summer by catching the light from 10 pm to One o'clock in the morning on my balcony, at home.
It was a very good flight for the city. Especially pleased with the scoops, a rod like flies (you know what), but mostly the same thing.
Although we can distinguish Aedia funesta Esper, 1786 and Amphipyra pyramidea Linnaeus, 1758 (isn't it a little early?)
I was also pleased with some Noctua sp., some strelchatka? and the crested Pterostoma palpina? Please help me bring these three butterflies to mind .
In general, I was satisfied. For almost the city center .
I attach a photo of the straightener (below is a photo of three butterflies that I asked to deal with)

1 - Noctua interposita
2 - Lacanobia ?thalassina
3-yes, P. palpina

  
Although we can distinguish Aedia funesta Esper, 1786 and Amphipyra pyramidea Linnaeus, 1758 (isn't it a little early?)

The image doesn't show the pyramid.

The image doesn't show the pyramid.

On the right, the second one is straightened. Or what are the options?

it's very small for a pyramid. what a beast! it would be nice to enlarge it, because you can't make out much in this picture.

upd: damn, I thought 2 on the left. 2 on the right side of the size is nothing, but it would be good to look at the drawing closer.

This post was edited by aleko - 01.07.2010 11: 19

Here, I highlighted it. I think it is, but we usually have them at the end of July.

Pictures:

pyramidea.jpg — (215.72к)

That's the one. I recognize my brother Kolya
and in the general masa on the die somehow did not recognize.

And this year all the butterflies fly out earlier, some much earlier. For example, this year I missed out on the first generation of egeria in general, although every time on the way to the dacha I combed a familiar site. It seems that we need to catch the output of the second generation before it's too late

This is Amphipyra berbera

This is Amphipyra berbera

But for this, thank you so much, that's it! Well then this is the first berbera in my life

But for this, thank you so much, that's it! Well then this is the first berbera in my life

A. pyramidea and A. berbera fly together.
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=403950

That's the one. I recognize my brother Kolya
and in the general masa on the die somehow did not recognize.

And this year all the butterflies fly out earlier, some much earlier. For example, this year I missed out on the first generation of egeria in general, although every time on the way to the dacha I combed a familiar site. It seems that we need to catch the output of the second generation before it's too late

We have a yellow garden ribbon nidelya back caught, is it normal?

We have a yellow garden ribbon nidelya back caught, is it normal?

Catocala fulminea? Yes, it is common (at least in our country). Now, however, I do not meet in the city (everything was built up), and earlier I flew to the balcony in bundles.

Yes, write after such a mega-report... Never mind, I'll also launch a mega-report when I get back from Primorye.
So, two nights from 2.07 to 04.07 O-Zuevsky district, Neftyanik. There were a lot of different large animals flying, but practically nothing rare. Oak-leaved cocoonworms flew by the dozens - the biggest and most numerous banal event this weekend. I was VERY pleased with the raspberry catocala-it came to my dacha for the first time in all 15 years of fishing. Again, for the first time at the dacha in Orekhovo-Zuyevo, I had dominoes, only 3 pieces-not to compare with last weekend at the dacha in Yaroslavl, where there were dozens of them, but I was pleased. Beetles, mostly ground beetles and brown, 2.5 cm barbels-obvious banals - in huge numbers. Photos of beetles later.

Pictures:

DSC04101.JPG — (499.42к)


DSC04103.JPG — (485.55 k)

Can I show you this scoop in close-up?

Pictures:

DSC04103.jpg — (21.34к)

Can I show you this scoop in close-up?

This is an acronym for strigose, nonsense in general...

Today's Balashikha (usachika tamara, plz):

http://kotbegemot.livejournal.com/533814.html

for sdi, even exornata and metalloid, similar to interrogationis, are commonplace.
Curly!
))

for sdi, even exornata and metalloid, similar to interrogationis, are commonplace.
Curly!
))

No, interrogationis his och even pleased
And I already have exornata from three points, including from the windowsill in Zhukovsky, and sdi - from its three regular points...

for sdi, even exornata and metalloid, similar to interrogationis, are commonplace.
Curly!
))

Seryoga zazhralis completely. All questions on the phone are answered by one thing: "Throw it away, it's g...o" But at the same time he constantly asks to catch him a series of something rare, and certainly with females and so that everything is zero...

To what T. kotbegemot recently pointed out for the Serebryanoprudsky district, I will add according to my data for July 1-4, 2010: from thick-headed tessellum (common), from satyrs russiae (rare), from pigeons idas (few), minimus (also) and argiades (common). By the way, the swallowtail is common (there is also a luxury one), carniolica is locally numerous, and in meleager females only steeveni (no typical ones were found), the alcon occasionally comes across a decent one (the main mass, of course, is tails). Maybe something else interesting will pop up on the analysis of the material. I'll post some photos later.

for sdi, even exornata and metalloid, similar to interrogationis, are commonplace.
Curly!
))

Pasha, but exornata has really become banal, it comes across everywhere and in a decent amount. Interrogationis-pleased, only the second in Neftyanik.
By the way, the timing of the summer is a complete mess. Still fly linden hawkmoth, and quite fresh (and the first appeared on May 15), and already went katokaly.

This post was edited on sdi-05.07.2010 07: 39