All Insecta.pro Comments

Community and Forum → All comments feed
All the latest comments on topics, photos and species on the site in reverse chronological order.
Show: All comments in a row. All comments, except for the technical ones.

Pages: 1 ...406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414... 625

04.09.2014 17:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29689

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

04.09.2014 17:23, Vladlep: comment on

Уважаемые коллеги!Готовится к изданию «Биографо-библиографический справочник лепидоптерологов России», в котором будут содержатся сведения о нескольких тысячах лепидоптерологов, работавших в Российской ...

04.09.2014 17:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #30808

Pardon me, I meant Pandemis.

04.09.2014 17:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #31051

Archips sp.

04.09.2014 17:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #31069

Tentatively identified due to no underside.

04.09.2014 16:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #32483

Corrected data. Not identified → Boloria selene / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

04.09.2014 15:41, todd.ugine: comment on

Hello, My name is Todd Ugine, I'm an entomologist at Cornell University in the USA and am trying to collect all of the North American species in the ladybird genus Coccinella. One species in particular, Coccinella fulgida, is very difficult for me to find, although I have learned that it also occurs in Siberia. I would like to use any specimens collected for molecular biology work, so it ...

04.09.2014 15:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #14223

I've got two species at the moment one of which http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/32829 (supposedly oculea male) will be examined. Only mine are from Vladimir region, doesn't matter anyway.

04.09.2014 12:33, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #33041

Corrected data. Not identified → Nomophila noctuella / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

04.09.2014 10:02, tiger33: comment on

Раз пошла такая пьянка, продолжаем. Не мебель правда, а орнамент и ювелирка.Надо уже название темы редактировать).Сообщение было отредактировано tiger33 - 04.09.2014 10:07

04.09.2014 7:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Amphipoea oculea

The top photo should be removed: it is certainly not it. Already suffered in uncertain .....

04.09.2014 1:39, Peter Khramov: comment on Caligo memnon

Dim, about subspecies still relevant?

03.09.2014 22:03, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #31625

Similarly to another pic of the species.

03.09.2014 22:03, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #31624

Corrected data. Not identified → Mathania agasicles / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

03.09.2014 17:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33034

Young larva. Here's another alike: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/15515

03.09.2014 15:11, Ksedorium: comment on

Обратил внимание на существенную разницу в расцветке рабочих особей Formica sanguinea в двух разных популяциях. В одной из них рабочие были ярко-красного цвета, голова и грудь полностью красные; во второй лоб, затылок, а ...

03.09.2014 12:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33031

Now it's +13 degrees Celcius outside and some still fly around :)

03.09.2014 12:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3287

Corrected data.

03.09.2014 12:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3286

Corrected data.

03.09.2014 12:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3285

Corrected data.

02.09.2014 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33020

Just can be wrongly moved... I changed :)

02.09.2014 20:19, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #33028

Corrected data. Not identified → Coenonympha pamphilus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.09.2014 19:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21279

Here also I think A. oculea. First to compare its shape, colour and spot pattern to mine: one species as I see. Completely agree with that prof Irina referred to in the very beginning :)

02.09.2014 18:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33027

Corrected data. Vladimir Bryukhov → Alexandr Zhakov.

02.09.2014 18:46, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #15901

:)))

02.09.2014 18:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33025

This one could be Amphipoea lucens, 50/50 probability. Sure just my humble opinion :)

02.09.2014 18:35, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #33024

Corrected data. Not identified → Xestia baja / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.09.2014 18:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33016

Species level. Pay attention to the shape of its hindwings (oculea has much more "round"), also that one is itself more round :) And its "eye" spot........ As for this one, no sense to examine genitalia as it's female. Tomorrow if the weather's good I'll have a night out there to collect some more "oculea" (supposedly) :)

02.09.2014 17:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #15903

Hope this is the last step...

02.09.2014 16:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33014

Alexandr, second time uploaded those next to each other. Still hope to get to know their habitus :) They do differ...