All Insecta.pro Comments

Community and Forum → All comments feed
All the latest comments on topics, photos and species on the site in reverse chronological order.
Show: All comments in a row. All comments, except for the technical ones.

Pages: 1 ...586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594... 627

14.01.2011 16:30, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4094

Cool photo even though not ideal from a technical point of view.

14.01.2011 16:21, Peter Khramov: comment on The extra photos

Yes, it will be gradually introduced new capabilities for editing users / authors. The same addition of new genera and species - is a step towards this. If you have any specific ideas, which still is not enough - let's discuss, and I'm on the results of the discussion will be implemented. With regard to the structure of the forum - pay attention that you can not view all the comments, but only ...

14.01.2011 15:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3139

Mine from personal account page are also identified all.

14.01.2011 15:43, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3000

Moved to "uncertain".

14.01.2011 15:38, Peter Khramov: comment on Argynnis aglaja

Glitch fixed.

14.01.2011 15:32, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3577

Photo moved.

14.01.2011 15:32, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3578

New species added, photo moved.

14.01.2011 13:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3327

Female now.

14.01.2011 12:56, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3115

Moved to M. berania.

14.01.2011 9:04, Evgeny Glebov: comment on photo #4020

Photos #4017-4020 are of the same butterfly shot from different angles.

14.01.2011 9:03, Evgeny Glebov: comment on photo #4018

Photos #4017-4020 are of the same butterfly shot from different angles.

14.01.2011 5:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #3330

This species is identified correctly.

14.01.2011 5:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #3328

This species is identified correctly.

14.01.2011 4:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #3524

This species is identified correctly.

14.01.2011 4:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #3589

This species is identified correctly.

14.01.2011 4:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #3588

Cyrestis thyodamas formosana, Fruhstorfer.

14.01.2011 4:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #3579

Parantica aglea phormion, Fruhstorfer, 1910.

14.01.2011 4:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #3663

This species is identified correctly.

14.01.2011 4:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #3848

Assimilis subspecies (Linnaeus, 1758).

14.01.2011 4:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #3847

Assimilis subspecies (Linnaeus, 1758) .

14.01.2011 4:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #3846

If it's South China (Yunnan, apparently), so must be Sasakia charonda yunnanensis Fruhstorfer.

13.01.2011 21:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #3934

This species is identified correctly.

13.01.2011 12:18, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3279

Moved.

13.01.2011 10:16, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #2995

In my photos this one is also named as pylaon! I've just fouled up while uploading :)

13.01.2011 1:48, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2091

Meh, species name updated.

13.01.2011 1:42, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2714

Comment goes to the species description page.

13.01.2011 1:40, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3540

Moved to Phyllophila obliterata.

13.01.2011 1:40, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3546

Photo goes to Eucarta virgo.

13.01.2011 1:38, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3344

Uncertain too.

13.01.2011 1:37, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3343

Ok then, nemorella, uncertain though.

13.01.2011 1:37, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2966

Goes to Pronophila unifasciata...

13.01.2011 1:34, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3435

Shot moved.

13.01.2011 1:30, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2965

Photo moved to the new species created.

13.01.2011 1:23, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3969

Comment moved to the species description page, http://lepidoptera.pro/species/notodonta-ziczac/.

13.01.2011 1:21, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3962

Goes to A. rumicis, "uncertain".

13.01.2011 1:20, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4032

Goes to Triodia sylvina.

13.01.2011 1:19, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4026

Moved.

13.01.2011 1:15, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #3387

Identifying tends to go very forward. Actually, it's too late for this species, though maybe that's the reason of its worn-out appearance. Anyway, no other suggestions on the mind.

13.01.2011 1:13, Peter Khramov: comment on Agriopis aurantiaria

Note moved to the photo http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/3678/

13.01.2011 1:05, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3542

See, this image is a very popular one...

13.01.2011 1:00, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4158

Ok then, moved.

13.01.2011 0:59, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2151

As far as I can remember, Igor usually shoots somewhere nearby Novorossiysk. Goes to M. cinxia.

13.01.2011 0:57, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3672

Thanks, moved.

13.01.2011 0:50, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2923

Species added, photo moved.

13.01.2011 0:39, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3800

Goes from "undetermined" to "uncertain".

13.01.2011 0:38, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3839

Still left in "uncertain".

13.01.2011 0:37, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3841

Moved.

13.01.2011 0:31, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3407

Ok then, moved to A. adippe.

13.01.2011 0:15, Peter Khramov: comment on Spam

The filter is, simply need to update it regularly for new templates. If it were not, the spam would valilsya mountain ... With regards to the authors - as anti-spam method, of course, is good, but should be able to nezaregannye threads and comments, and news (but not foty and types). Therefore, while it is not necessary to separate.In general, I will do what is possible under the present ...