Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469... 627

17.02.2014 19:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27642

Well, where shall I go from here :) It's just nerves play tricks on all recently dissolved concoctions (and not only from her). Very poor become: old probably ... :( After the site is already almost five years and I already can not live without it :)

17.02.2014 18:25, Sergei Kotov: comment on photo #9728

In this photo agree with Alexander, I looked closely (and in comparison with the above features) photo, and yes, it still Plusia festucae.

17.02.2014 17:59, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27663

Corrected data. Not identified → Actebia praecurrens / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.02.2014 13:41, Svetlana Shchavelina: comment on photo #13318

As for the pictures ... I understand that in this case they are first placed on the service side to save photos (eg www.photobucket.com) or any other resource, and then the address of this photo is filled by pressing the "picture from another site" . From my personal experience.As moderator of a very large resource with experience of 8 years and the owner of its own website, which is already 5 ...

17.02.2014 4:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27639

Corrected data. Not identified → Arctornis alba / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

17.02.2014 1:01, Jean-Paul Herzet: comment on Catocala mariana

endemic Spain

17.02.2014 0:58, Jean-Paul Herzet: comment on photo #27659

This species is identified correctly.

16.02.2014 23:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #23800

Corrected data. Bastilla fulvotaenia → Dysgonia fulvotaenia.

16.02.2014 21:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27133

By JW I give in and apologize that butted, but it reminds me more aceris (if intermedia its subspecies) or auricoma: both if you believe the notorious Sinev should be there.

16.02.2014 19:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27641

Hint: same Acronicta sp.

16.02.2014 19:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27646

Corrected data. Not identified → Heliothis maritima / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.02.2014 10:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27645

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

16.02.2014 9:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #20711

Grounds: 1) http://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/140-Euthalia/Euthalia-aconthea 2) http://michibikuhikari.blogspot.ru/2012/09/doubutsu-no-kuni.html (scroll down).

16.02.2014 6:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27599

What for? Although I contact him today. You can in fact write the label if the data is there for it (as done in this butterfly).

16.02.2014 1:12, Peter Khramov: comment on Epinotodonta leucodera

Yes, apparently, in the blue typo, and it all went ... fix.

16.02.2014 1:07, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #27007

Concerning the wills of comments in the system area.

16.02.2014 0:54, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #27621

One of the champions: -)

16.02.2014 0:54, Peter Khramov: comment on Gortyna fortis

Ok, corrected. ZY Double dog to work and of comments on the pages of the same types of use, if there is a need:Gortyna fortis.

15.02.2014 23:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #23738

Corrected data. Not identified / Male → Dysphania transducta / Confidently identified / Imago / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 23:18, Igor Ivannikov: comment on photo #27631

Well, Vasily, I uchtu your comments, and take away the question marks. Thank you for your view definition.

15.02.2014 23:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25306

Corrected data. Not identified → Tagiades japetus / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 22:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25310

Corrected data. Not identified → Appias libythea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 22:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25309

Corrected data. Not identified → Appias libythea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 22:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27189

Corrected data. Not identified → Appias lyncida / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 22:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27191

Corrected data. Not identified → Appias libythea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 22:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27190

Corrected data. Not identified → Appias nero / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 22:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27579

Corrected data. Not identified → Geometra glaucaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.02.2014 21:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27632

It was in the admin as the infinitive, and in the name of the species were a few question marks, so get an author photo. That same situation if the author boot neoprene. kind of rearrange daw "just-inaccurate".

15.02.2014 21:46, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #11250

Yes, that means that a good number 1039, it made a mistake in 1049, here in 1139 again made a mistake :)

15.02.2014 15:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11668

Corrected data. Not identified → Alpenus investigatorum / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 15:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11667

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Alpenus investigatorum / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 15:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27239

Corrected data. Not identified → Nyctemera tripunctaria / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 15:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27238

Corrected data. Not identified → Nyctemera tripunctaria / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 13:17, guest: AlisaInAsia: comment on Question about caterpillars

I live in Asia. Although I do not see the need to study what is nearby. It is interesting to study what is interesting, not what is at hand.

15.02.2014 11:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #24209

Corrected data. Antheraea jana → Antheraea platessa.

15.02.2014 10:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #14608

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

15.02.2014 5:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26977

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Lymantria lunata / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 4:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27571

Corrected data. Not identified → Ptilodon capucina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.02.2014 19:44, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13551

Corrected data. Anacampsis blattariella / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov → Not identified.

14.02.2014 19:44, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13553

Corrected data. Coleophora deauratella / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov → Not identified.

14.02.2014 19:43, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9906

Corrected data. Pandesma robusta / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov → Not identified.

14.02.2014 19:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27583

Corrected data. Not identified → Culpinia diffusa / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.02.2014 19:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26812

Yes, it's from someone volnyanok. And even of the tribe Orgyiini the goose is likely. Sorry, then pass ....

14.02.2014 19:14, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #14086

Corrected data. Anacampsis blattariella / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov → Not identified.

14.02.2014 18:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Plagerepne torquata

Alexander, indeed: how is it determined? It is interesting to swear :)

14.02.2014 18:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27598

Well, I'm about the same :)

14.02.2014 17:31, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27594

Vasily I try not to define Saturn is worse than a bunch of pictures :) hawk moths, and do not always correspond. Thanks for the answer, I just want to embed the view from the source on what it determines that, there were no misunderstandings.

14.02.2014 17:17, Hierophis: comment on Let's save the site "Beetles and coleopterologists"

Wild Yuri, I will certainly write something very inconvenient again right now.. but I've spent some time reading some of the articles on the website of this American society.. including how they understand entomology and what their society does. You know, they really do science there! Look, it's written here in the booklethttp://entsoc.org/discover-entomologyIt says that entomology is the science ...