Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592... 626

16.01.2011 15:08, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #1757

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:08, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #3122

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:08, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #4103

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:07, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #4104

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:05, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #4013

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:04, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #1969

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:01, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #3485

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:00, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #1904

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:00, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #1905

This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 14:35, Peter Khramov: comment on Schrankia balneorum

Ok, corrected.

16.01.2011 14:34, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3586

Alexandr, thanks for identifying. Photo moved.

16.01.2011 14:32, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3590

Continue talking of subspecies: now one can get subspecies info only at species description pages, reading descriptions or comments (as Dmitry and Alexandr have been adding such comments). But one can't tell looking at the image if there is any subspecies info or not (if subspecies was specified at all). I think, that now there is no need in individual subspecies pages. Nevertheless, we should ...

16.01.2011 14:25, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3525

Last Dmitry Podjogin comment moved to the species description page.

16.01.2011 14:24, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3307

Caucasus removed.

16.01.2011 14:22, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2831

Updated.

16.01.2011 14:22, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2832

Ok then, thanks, updated.

16.01.2011 14:21, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2852

Dmitry, this is the same: maybe I have a photo with its underside, but of another butterfly. Will specify later.

16.01.2011 14:14, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3751

Moved to M. dryas.

16.01.2011 14:12, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4079

Moved.

16.01.2011 13:19, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Polyommatus damone

P. damone tanais (Dantchenko et Lukhtanov, 1993), the authors of the subspecies are listed is not true, right (Dantchenko et Pljushtch, 1993). And in light of recent data, for the Crimea described subspecies of P. damone rljushtchi (Lukhtanov et Budashkin, 1993);

15.01.2011 5:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on Graphium sarpedon

Subspecies teredon - Sri Lanka sarpedon - India Burma Thailand, Malaysia, Hainan Is, Sumatra, Borneo, The Philippines, Java and Bali semifasciatus - SE and West China connectens - Taiwan nipponum - Japan rufofervidum - Nias Is phyris - Mentawei Is rufocellularis - Bawean adonarensis - Sumbawa, Adonara, Flores jugens - Sumba timorensis - Timor, ...

14.01.2011 20:00, Dmitry Vlasov: comment on Semijulistus callosus. Distribution

Гораздо реже у нас встречается другой вид этого рода - Anthocomus equestris. Ловил всего дважды, и оба раза на лету в городе Ярославле.Этот вид - весенний, встречается обычно в мае и тоже в помещениях или в транспорте (на окнах). Я ...

14.01.2011 17:37, Peter Khramov: comment on Amendments relating to information about authors

The gallery Fixed an issue where not all authors are displayed in the photo list. On each page of the poster images are now shown the most popular of his photographs.

14.01.2011 16:45, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3140

Subspecies had been already removed. Signed "male".

14.01.2011 16:30, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4094

Cool photo even though not ideal from a technical point of view.

14.01.2011 16:21, Peter Khramov: comment on The extra photos

Yes, it will be gradually introduced new capabilities for editing users / authors. The same addition of new genera and species - is a step towards this. If you have any specific ideas, which still is not enough - let's discuss, and I'm on the results of the discussion will be implemented. With regard to the structure of the forum - pay attention that you can not view all the comments, but only ...