Identification of Hymenoptera (wasps, bees, ants)

It looks like it's them. Antennatus larvae feed on cicadas. It is not surprising that I have not seen this species further north in Ukraine.

The mountain cicada is found north to the Leningrad region.

?? Western Caucasus
1



2 what kind of genus, megahila, or something else?

1. Sapyga sp., M. B. S. clavicornis (I guessed from the photos, so I don't claim).

2. The genus Osmia, but the species can not be determined.

Moscow region, Voynovo-gora 13.07.2020

I feel sorry for Osku

And how dynamic and magnificent it is in nature, although it seems to be an "ordinary" lacerticide..

I feel sorry for Osku

And how dynamic and magnificent it is in nature, although it seems to be an "ordinary" lacerticide..

Batozonellus lacerticida?

Well yeah Interestingly, I specially reviewed all the local finds of lacerticides, so in 2008 here in the lacerticides with a light hand recorded cryptocheilus, and also here there is a dried fruit, but clearly Lophopompilus samariensis from near Poltava

Batozonellus lacerticida?

The correct name is Parabatozonus lacerticida (Pallas, 1771) (=Batozonellus lacerticida) [Pompilidae]

Under Tsar Pea was
https://www.gbif.org/ru/species/4505625

I open Panov's link and read:

Still, it is worth admitting that they changed it again
In 2017, everything was still normal
http://www.catalogueoflife.org/annual-chec...lus+lacerticida

In 2018, it is already again native-poskonnoe
http://www.catalogueoflife.org/annual-chec...lus+lacerticida

Would sting four lacerticides twice a day of these money changers

Under Tsar Pea was
https://www.gbif.org/ru/species/4505625

There is such a parsley with a generic affiliation:

First, in Road Wasps of the Russian Far East (2014), Loktionov and Lelyov synonymized Batozonellus to Parabatozonus.

But then, after studying the type of Batozonellus, we came to the conclusion that this is a good genus, but lacerticida still belongs to Parabatozonus. This is already in "An annotated catalog of the spider wasps (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) of Russia" (Zootaxa 4280).

Still, it is worth admitting that they changed it again
In 2017, everything was still normal

Pan stores links for several years, and puts them out as arguments without first checking them? What if a porn site suddenly appeared there now?

There is such a parsley with a generic affiliation:
First, in Road Wasps of the Russian Far East (2014), Loktionov and Lelyov synonymized Batozonellus to Parabatozonus.

Obvious letter-eating, especially since the main meaning of this information from this catalog is still unclear, yes, it says that this name (Parabatozonus) is mentioned earlier than Batozonellus ( for one year, by the way), but they never revealed why it is mentioned there in that article, and the article of 1936 (Japanese, by the way) is not available on the Internet.
In general, instead of consistently studying the ecology, biology, and development of lacerticide larvae (yes, I didn't find anything but fragmentary information on it), or at least molecular studies were conducted, they just took and renamed the genus for formal reasons )))
I looked now specially at home in the Soviet book of 1980 issue, there is this lacerticide, called Batozonellus lacerticida

And, well, if it is written in the Soviet book of the shaggy year, then this is an unshakable truth forever and ever
But what about the Ukrainian spirit of struggle against the heavy Soviet legacy? Doesn't he tell you to rename everything connected with the "filthy scoop" in one way or another?

The message was edited INO-20.07.2020 23: 04

Moscow region, Voynovo-gora 20.07.2020

Moscow region, Voynovo-gora 20.07.2020

Most likely Chrysis equestris Dahlbom, 1845

An interesting hymenopteran. What could it be?
Ocd. Krasnoyarsk, forest-steppe. 30.06.20.
Span of kr. - 20 mm

Scolia quadripunctata.

Note to Pan Hierophis: I can't guarantee the validity of the name at the moment, I haven't checked it.

Scolia quadripunctata.

Note to Pan Hierophis: I can't guarantee the validity of the name at the moment, I haven't checked it.

According to the Russian census catalog, it is a junior synonym of Scolia sexmaculata-and if it is, then it is a new species for the Krasnoyarsk Territory.

In general, if an insect is on a pin, then it is possible to determine by the determinant))
But if only a humane approach, only a photo hunt, then yes,
but even in such cases I try, and by the way, this ace - like in terms of habit - cryptoheilus, size approx.25mm, but.. that's where the determinant for the key "the body is completely black" led me )))

In general, scolia
six-point(by the way, the name is still buggy, four-point (Scolia quadripunctata) - it was much better, where does it have 6 points?? And this, as far as I remember, is again the work of imperial taxonomists, and again a formal reason )
one of the most northern scolias, this season it is especially often posted from Belarus, and in Belarus there is also a site about os, and there is also this scolia, and so I went there to read about it, everything is very well written, and photos are cool, but damn!!
Why on the uppercase page! photo of hirta's scolium
https://vespa-g2n.jimdofree.com/scolioidea/...quadripunctata/

And hirta's description clearly includes a male galyubula
And on the request
of Cryptocheilus
egregius in the first link gives it is not clear who!
http://alsphotopage.com/image/show/id/7863
The world lies in LG

by the way, the name is still buggy, four-point (Scolia quadripunctata) - it was much better, where does it have 6 points?? And this, as far as I remember, is again the work of imperial taxonomists, and again a formal reason

Apparently, it was the "imperial taxonomists" who forced O. F. Muller in 1766 to describe this species (from a specimen with six spots) earlier than Fabricius did in 1775 (from a specimen with four spots). At least you'd be ashamed to show off what's in your head instead of your brain. If you seriously think that your opinion is as powerful as the work of people who spend their entire lives working on taxonomy, then this is already a symptom.

The post was edited by Carcharot - 25.07.2020 00: 02

Obvious letter-eating, especially since the main meaning of this information from this catalog is still unclear, yes, it says that this name (Parabatozonus) is mentioned earlier than Batozonellus ( for one year, by the way), but they never revealed why it is mentioned there in that article, and the article of 1936 (Japanese, by the way) is not available on the Internet.
In general, instead of consistently studying the ecology, biology, and development of lacerticide larvae (yes, I didn't find anything but fragmentary information on it), or at least molecular studies were conducted, they just took and renamed the genus for formal reasons )))
I looked now specially at home in the Soviet book of 1980 issue, there is this lacerticide, called Batozonellus lacerticida

Following this logic, we need to go further and call it Sphex lacerticida, as Pallas originally called it. And also to go teach how to work, all specialists of all sciences, because Herofis knows better than some people with degrees, what is required of them.

And hirta's description clearly includes a male galyubula
And on the request
of Cryptocheilus
egregius in the first link gives it is not clear who!
http://alsphotopage.com/image/show/id/7863
The world lies in LG

That's right, here it is "free science" as it is, without any "empires" and "literalism".

For some time now, I had fancied I could barely hear a strange chirping sound from the material cabinet. I took out the boxes and examined their interior, but found nothing. The chirping was repeated periodically. A couple of days ago, I decided that I needed to deal with it decisively. I took out all the boxes and examined them from all sides. On the back wall of one of the boxes, the last in the top row, and standing with a gap to the side wall of the shelf (about 1.5 cm), I found nests of some wasp. A total of 16 clay "jugs", including 1 fresh (wet) unfinished, 1 started, but abandoned, 1 not sealed empty and the rest sealed, with clay lids. I opened one jug, and there were some small spiders in it, 16 in number, paralyzed, but apparently still alive ( or canned food?). I believe that the nest belongs to Sceliphron sp. I didn't see the wasp itself - it probably flew away. Can you tell me what kind of view it might be (Vidnoye, near Moscow, 8th floor of an apartment building)? I've never encountered them before, but they don't seem to be very common. I enclose the photo.

For some time now, I had fancied I could barely hear a strange chirping sound from the material cabinet. I took out the boxes and examined their interior, but found nothing. The chirping was repeated periodically. A couple of days ago, I decided that I needed to deal with it decisively. I took out all the boxes and examined them from all sides. On the back wall of one of the boxes, the last in the top row, and standing with a gap to the side wall of the shelf (about 1.5 cm), I found nests of some wasp. A total of 16 clay "jugs", including 1 fresh (wet) unfinished, 1 started, but abandoned, 1 not sealed empty and the rest sealed, with clay lids. I opened one jug, and there were some small spiders in it, 16 in number, paralyzed, but apparently still alive ( or canned food?). I believe that the nest belongs to Sceliphron sp. I didn't see the wasp itself - it probably flew away. Can you tell me what kind of view it might be (Vidnoye, near Moscow, 8th floor of an apartment building)? I've never encountered them before, but they don't seem to be very common. I enclose the photo.

So you wouldn't break them, but wait for the wasps to come out.
Most likely, some kind of invasive species-curvatum or deforme.

The post was edited by kotbegemot - 07/28/2020 18: 20

Who knows who Mueller got his hands on, maybe it was a colpa.. six-point map

And the day before yesterday I finally saw kolpa Kluge

And soon there will be photos that are publicly available, in live form, and on a publicly accessible international resource, where, among other things, it is possible to revise definitions, and a specialist can always correct incorrect data.
This is "free science" - when animals are photographed in nature, and are available for everyone to view and use, and do not lie in the form of dried fruits in secure institutions
Another thing is that some experts are clearly biased and do not specifically define the operating system there, and this is generally very bad from an ethical point of view, for this you need to deprive the salary



This post was edited by Hierophis - 07/28/2020 19: 45

So you wouldn't break them, but wait for the wasps to come out.
Most likely, some kind of invasive species-curvatum or deforme.

So I only opened one, and there are many more. Without it, I wouldn't have been able to determine the exact gender. I take it you can't tell anything from the sculpture of the nests or the composition of the victims?"

So I only opened one, and there are many more. Without it, I wouldn't have been able to determine the exact gender. I take it you can't tell anything from the sculpture of the nests or the composition of the victims?"

Such cells, it seems, only have Sceliphron from ours. Wait for the wasps to come! =)
They don't seem to have been specified for the MO yet-except for the native destillatorium, which goes north to the Oka River. But his cells are soldered together.

So just the appearance of these cells is quite enough to determine the genus, so it was possible not to open such nests in us in such places only kurvatum builds, but deformes in our area have not yet been found, I will not say anything about it.

The message was edited INO-28.07.2020 20: 20

Who knows who Mueller got his hands on, maybe it was a colpa.. six-point map

And soon there will be photos, publicly available, in live form, and on a publicly accessible international resource,

Live photos? Do wasps fly out of them and sting?



A-a-a-a-a-a! Eumenes:

However, I am very surprised that Pan doesn't know this oska by sight, because this is almost the same as not knowing Vanessa io.

The message was edited INO-28.07.2020 20: 46

And fly out, and sting

Pictures:

P1820306.jpg — (284.45к)

About "eumenes" - a worthy reaction for a representative of the scientific community of the RFII, which shows the essence well, the same is true in the case of Wikipedia - instead of correcting it, they make fun of it, despite the fact that they climb Wikipedia 20 times a day And make fun of themselves Because this is their Rus. the language segment in which they are the hosts, in English and Ukrainian everything is fine
And I still don't know about this mask, you never know how many of them there are, but, however, the situation here is similar to the one described above

However, I am very surprised that Pan doesn't know this oska by sight, because this is almost the same as not knowing Vanessa io.

And, by the way, what is this wasp?