Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

For me, it's Pyrrhalta viburni (Paykull, 1799)

Maybe I was wrong. We usually have plenty of willow boogers at this time of year.

Maybe I was wrong. We usually have plenty of willow boogers at this time of year.

Here at this link - the 4th photo.
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http:/...snum=4&ct=image

Here at this link - the 4th photo.
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http:/...snum=4&ct=image

Yes, it looks like you're right. Do not execute strictly!

What's that bug?"
Taken in: Moscow region, Ramenskiy district, neighborhood of the village. Khripan, June.

Pictures:

7_DSC04047.jpg — (191.49к)

Omophlus lepturoides

Tapinotus sellatus, supported by

Then gumenuk:
Now it's Tapeinotus sort of.
Larinus - more like turbinatus, but not exactly sturnus. From above would be.
Otiorhinx-like ligustici.

I don't like the color of the nutcracker for pectinicornis. Pectinicornis is green rather than bronze.

Then NakaRB:
kozyavochek would also be on top...

I don't like the color of the nutcracker for pectinicornis. Pectinicornis is green rather than bronze.


[/quote]
It also happens to be bronze (varies). It's a common occurrence in the Moscow region: http://macroid.ru/showphoto.php/photo/422

This post was edited by vasiliy-feoktistov - 27.09.2009 21: 33

Crimea, Simferopol, 1-20. VI. 2009
7 mm
Who is it?

Pictures:

Krym._7mm.jpg — (67.68к)

Hurray! So it's too early for me to be colorblind!  

...The fact is that I have a cold so I want to write off everything on the disease - it's all her fault! with the temperature of lutshe do not look at the beetles))) fuh hope justified

Help determine the genus of these weevils.
Taken in: Moscow region, Ramenskiy district, neighborhood of the village. Khripan, June

1 larinus turbinatus 100%, I'm doing larinuses right now(this type has already spread out from 15 pieces)

Help determine the genus of these weevils.
Taken in: Moscow region, Ramenskiy district, neighborhood of the village. Khripan, June

the first photo shows a "married couple" - Larinus sturnus.

Then gumenuk:
Larinus - more like turbinatus, but not exactly sturnus. From above would be

In deep pardon! I made an unforgivable mistake in my comments: I was thinking about L. turbinatus, but for some reason it was written sturnus ... Of course, it is Larinus turbinatus (Gyllenhal, 1836), and it is the only one in the Marine World with a perfectly straight head tube.

Crimea, Simferopol, 1-20. VI. 2009
7 mm
Who is it?

Whether Leiopus nebulosus, or L. femoratus

Crimea, Simferopol, 1-20. VI. 2009
7 mm
Who is it?

Leiopus punctulatus

Either Leiopus nebulosus or L. femoratus

Leiopus or what punctulatus

There are already three options... It's good that at least in Leiopus(e) they agreed...

There are already three options... It's good that at least in Leiopus(e) they agreed...

One option, though-femoratus

One option, though, is femoratus

Please explain, so that you will know for the future, what led to the unambiguous conclusion...

isn't Leiopus linnei shabby?

This post was edited by Alexey Sazhnev - 27.09.2009 23: 02

isn't Leiopus linnei shabby?

Vo, another option!

linnei

For me, it's Pyrrhalta viburni (Paykull, 1799)

But for me, it's still not viburni, but some kind of Galerucella.
I looked at all my viburni, others they are a little.

But for me, it's still not viburni, but some kind of Galerucella.
I looked at all my viburni, they are a little different.

What's wrong with viburni? If you focus on the habit, then with such a characteristic large head, we don't have any more boogers, like: wide (almost with a pronotum), the cheeks are again long and visible...

This post was edited by Dmitrich - 27.09.2009 23: 26

What's wrong with viburni? If you focus on the habit, then with such a characteristic large head, we don't have any more boogers, like: wide (almost with a pronotum), the cheeks are again long and visible...

The color is not her IMHO ... And in general the habitus is slightly different
http://www.fkohl.de/tree/photo/de/Pyrrhalt...08.06-41066/-/-

This post was edited by Fornax13-28.09.2009 00: 05

The color is not her IMHO ... And in general the habitus is slightly different
http://www.fkohl.de/tree/photo/de/Pyrrhalt...08.06-41066/-/-

I agree, the coloring is different. Indeed, it would be nice to look at the photo from above, if any, and also find out what the couple was sitting on...

Why Leiopus? And not Oplosia cinerea (Mulsant, 1839), for example?
http://www.cerambyx.uochb.cz/oplosia.jpg

This post was edited by Mantispid - 28.09.2009 05: 23

Please explain, so that you will know in the future what led to an unambiguous conclusion...

Resulted in the following:
1. L. punctulatus has rather clear white or whitish narrow rings on the segments of the antennae (nebulosus/femoratus does not have them, the antennae are red-brown with black tips).
2. In L. nebulosus, the pronotum is noticeably more transverse than in the photographed specimen, with clearly uneven dotted lines along the middle of the disc (here it seems to be thick and uniform).
3. In L. nebulosus, the light band in the middle is clearly more contrasting in comparison with the dark one located behind it, whereas here it is the opposite.
4. L. femoratus is characteristic of the Crimea.
Well, my own copies of these three types, which I previously looked at

Why Leiopus? And not Oplosia cinerea (Mulsant, 1839), for example?
http://www.cerambyx.uochb.cz/oplosia.jpg

Then open the image using your link and put both photos side by side. Compare the proportions of the elytra first. Well, for the defined instance. the size specified is 7 mm

linnei

Take a look at this http://macroid.ru/showphoto.php?photo=6720

For Leiopus femoratus, there are also quite characteristic dark spots near the scutellum and on the sides of the elytra in their first third. Evgeny Vladimirovich is right - this is Leiopus femoratus Fairmaire, 1859, on Leiopus linnei the given specimen. it really does not pull, and the presence of Leiopus nebulosus in the Crimea is now questionable.

Then rpanin, photos of Leiopus can be viewed here http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=236899, there is also an article on linnei .But in my opinion, the situation with the Crimean beetles is strange, I have 2 specimens from the Crimea, they are strange, small, not chunky, but oval, in terms of habit, they are generally closer to caucasicus than to nebulosus or linnei .So, you can decide for yourself or unsubscribe from KDG. He will definitely help you deal with this, if he is not too lazy.

Honestly, I have no idea what femoratus SHOULD look like.. Judging by the photos of ssacad, it doesn't look like femoratus at all..
Although I found the following signs based on the photos I viewed, if any:
black rings on the whiskers of Linnaeus occupy the floor of the segment, in femoratus the base is in favor of
femoratus the pronotum is on the side of Linnaeus with a strong curved thorn, in femoratus with a small weak thorn - not visible in the photo, but it seems like feormatus.

waiting for the final conclusion of the pros ))

KDG to the studio!

The color is not her IMHO ... And in general the habitus is slightly different
http://www.fkohl.de/tree/photo/de/Pyrrhalt...08.06-41066/-/-

Yeah. For example, all my viburni on the covers have a place for ribs. And in all the photos on the links, these ribs are also there. And the head, well, the head. I was not too lazy and looked at my galerucells. In profile, the head is exactly the same as in the above photo.

Yeah. For example, all my viburni on the covers have a place for ribs. And in all the photos on the links, these ribs are also there. And the head, well, the head. I was not too lazy and looked at my galerucells. In profile, the head is exactly the same as in the above photo.

I agree, it's convincing. Only the "cheeks" still confuse me - in the picture they look quite long... A lot could explain the plant on which the beetles were removed.

Here's a little bit of karabid. Maybe something can be determined...

1. Pterostichus (Lenapterus) sp.
Some north… Unfortunately, there is no information about the location. The label shows only the time and name of the collector (A. Tsybulsky, 04.07.1988). But in the same collections there is a well-defined Diacheila polita Faldermann, 1835.
Length 13 mm

2. Pterostichus ? (Lenapterus) sp.
Same fees
Length 12 mm

3. Same fees.
Length 7 mm

4. Tajikistan, Maidan Gorge, h=2000 m. 13.07.1998
Length 11 mm

5. Turkmenistan, Aushlu gorge, 11.04.1977
Length 5 mm

6. Very similar to Cymindis (s. str.) lineata Quens., 1806.
Azerbaijan, Gobustan, 16.05.2000.
Length 13 mm

7. N. India, Himachal Pradesh, Solan, Sallagat, h=1000 m. 24.05.2008.
Length 15 mm

8. Brachinus sp. Uzbekistan, Nuratau, Anum, h=1800 m. 06.1996.
Length 9 mm

This post was edited by Buzman - 09/28/2009 12:36 pm

Pictures:

01.jpg — (71.74 k)


02.jpg — (76.06к)


03.jpg — (81.8к)


04.jpg — (83.18к)


05.jpg — (69.94 k)


06.jpg — (100.95 k)


07.jpg — (95.42к)


08.jpg — (83.53к)

I agree, it's convincing. Only the "cheeks" still confuse me - in the picture they look quite long... A lot could explain the plant on which the beetles were removed.

Yes, that would be nice. I treat leaf beetles with great sympathy and almost all leaf beetles from the collection have plants on which they are collected. Even the willows before the species learned to identify. Those. those who photograph leaf eaters would pay attention to the plants on which they feed.

What kind of bug?
Taken: Moscow region, Ramenskiy district, June, flew to the light of the lamp

Pictures:

9_DSC01328.jpg — (245.39к)

Prionychus ater (Fabricius, 1775)

Does it look like it's some kind of goldilocks?
Taken: Black Sea coast, surroundings of Abrau Durso, June, on a rose hip, approximately 6 mm.

This post was edited by gumenuk - 28.09.2009 14: 21

Pictures:

10_DSC03900.jpg — (194.85к)

exactly Anthaxia but the view is not say