E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Community and Forum → Insects identification → Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Pages: 1 ...202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210... 854

30.09.2009 7:29, evk

Then Ellescus scanicus (Paykull, 1792)
http://claude.schott.free.fr/Curculioninae...ioninae-PL4.jpg

Well, I'm not smile.gifconfused by the picture light seam, for scanicus is not suitable. My copies are dark everywhere. I would like to see the head tube. then you can talk. And here you will not understand.

30.09.2009 7:34, evk

I looked again. I agree that rather scanicus. The head tube at the base is clearly "broken", and in carpini with a smooth bend.

30.09.2009 7:39, gumenuk

Help me identify a narrow wing (shot in May) and a leaf beetle (shot in July on asparagus) - MO. Ramenskiy district

Pictures:
picture: 25_____DSC03292.jpg
25_____DSC03292.jpg — (179.72к)

picture: 26______DSC00254.jpg
26______DSC00254.jpg — (158.95к)

30.09.2009 7:55, evk

Help me identify a narrow wing (shot in May) and a leaf beetle (shot in July on asparagus) - MO. Ramenskiy district

Leaf beetle Phyllobrotica quadrimaculata L. On asparagus by accident.
Likes: 1

30.09.2009 10:18, vasiliy-feoktistov

Help me identify a narrow wing (shot in May) and a leaf beetle (shot in July on asparagus) - MO. Ramenskiy district

Narrow wing: Male Oedemera virescens Linnaeus, 1767? (not sure)
Likes: 1

30.09.2009 11:46, Buzman

To Rpanin: Maybe this photo is a little better, but I'm not sure. I can't get a better picture...

Pictures:
picture: 1.jpg
1.jpg — (91.83 k)

picture: 2.jpg
2.jpg — (68.77 k)

30.09.2009 11:49, Buzman

Another Nebria.
Azerbaijan, Hyrkan forest, 16-18. 05. 2000
Length 12 mm
With the quality of the photo again just a problem, but it doesn't get any better...

This post was edited by Buzman - 30.09.2009 11: 50

Pictures:
picture: nebria_sp.jpg
nebria_sp.jpg — (102.84к)

30.09.2009 12:02, Buzman

To evk: once again to Brachinus'u
Uzbekistan, Nuratau, Anum, h=1800 m. 06.1996.
Length 9 mm

This post was edited by Buzman - 30.09.2009 12: 04

Pictures:
picture: b_1.jpg
b_1.jpg — (125.9 k)

picture: b_2.jpg
b_2.jpg — (86.96к)

picture: b_3.jpg
b_3.jpg — (57.02к)

30.09.2009 12:43, rpanin

To Rpanin: Maybe this photo is a little better, but I'm not sure. I can't get a better picture...

Taki transsylvanica.
But you have a mistake with the height and size.Nebria transsylvanica is never this big and at this height!
Likes: 1

30.09.2009 13:51, Buzman

Thank you very much to evk and you! Well, with the height apparently really messed up in the label. Well, with the dimensions, everything seems to be correct... Well, maybe I threw an extra millimeter by accident, but no more!... smile.gif shuffle.gif
But, by the way, under your photo Transylvania on http://www.carabidae.ru/Carabidae/transsyl...rmar_1824s.html there is a mark of 2000 m... But maybe I misunderstood, and you meant that for them the height should be above 1200 m and not below 600...

This post was edited by Buzman - 30.09.2009 14: 11

30.09.2009 14:48, rpanin

Thank you very much to evk and you! Well, with the height apparently really messed up in the label. Well, with the dimensions, everything seems to be correct... Well, maybe I threw an extra millimeter by accident, but no more!... smile.gif  shuffle.gif 
But, by the way, under your photo Transylvania on http://www.carabidae.ru/Carabidae/transsyl...rmar_1824s.html there is a mark of 2000 m... But maybe I misunderstood, and you meant that for them the height should be above 1200 m and not below 600...

At least above 1400-1500 m.
I personally did not meet it below 1550m.
Likes: 1

30.09.2009 16:27, vasiliy-feoktistov

Please help me identify the Moscow region nutcrackers Ampedus sp.

This post was edited by vasiliy-feoktistov - 30.09.2009 17: 43

30.09.2009 16:48, Sungaya

Once I laid out this beetle and it was identified as Hydrophilus piceus

I would like to clarify, is this really a Hydrophilus aterrimus or can it be a Hydrophilus aterrimus?
M. O., Sergiev Posad district, Zolototilovo village, August 18, 2007, was born.

Pictures:
picture: piceus01a.jpg
piceus01a.jpg — (41.46к)

picture: piceus01c.jpg
piceus01c.jpg — (48.66к)

30.09.2009 17:00, vasiliy-feoktistov

Too similar to Hydrophilus aterrimus Eschscholtz, 1822 (but not exactly).
Likes: 1

30.09.2009 17:03, Алексей Сажнев

I think Hydrophilus aterrimus is-because the keel on the abdomen does not seem to be visible, and for the piceus MO too northern region, it is more along the forest-steppe and steppe
Likes: 1

30.09.2009 17:07, Victor Titov

Once I laid out this beetle and it was identified as Hydrophilus piceus

I would like to clarify, is this really a Hydrophilus aterrimus or can it be a Hydrophilus aterrimus?
M. O., Sergiev Posad district, Zolototilovo village, August 18, 2007, was born.

Of course, Hydrophilus aterrimus yes.gif
Likes: 1

30.09.2009 17:29, evk

Another Nebria.
Azerbaijan, Hyrkan forest, 16-18. 05. 2000
Length 12 mm
With the quality of the photo again just a problem, but it doesn't get any better...

I have two options for this animal.
The first and main one is N. (Alpaeus) faldermanni Men. It is widespread in Talysh. I have an ex. from the heights of 1600-1800 m. My dimensions are 10-11 mm.
The second option is N. (A.) motschulskyi Chaud. Collecting from heights of more than 3000 m (Babatag, east of the Karachay river). Size 12-14 mm.
I can't tell the difference between these two options from the photo. Try it now for yourself.
On Brachinus later posooobrazhayu, if other willing is not found earlier.
With photo quality: think about the lighting (reflectors, diffusers, etc.) If, of course, a simple soap dish will not help much, and if something is more serious, then you can make candy by shooting collectible copies.
Likes: 1

30.09.2009 17:40, evk

At least above 1400-1500 m.
I personally did not meet it below 1550m.

By the way. In the mountains, I have never found low-mountain views in the subalpine and Alpine regions, but on the contrary-repeatedly. Especially for nebryas, which are successfully carried away by water during heavy rains much lower than the habitat zone. Since we have only one specimen, it can be accidental. As I understand it, there is no information that they were collected en masse at this height. So there are options smile.gif

30.09.2009 17:55, Fornax13

The scorer can't be Brachinus klapperichi?
Likes: 1

30.09.2009 18:09, Sungaya

little beetle
MO, Mytishchi, May 12

Pictures:
picture: IMG_2770.jpg
IMG_2770.jpg — (51.53к)

30.09.2009 18:16, vasiliy-feoktistov

Lilioceris merdigera Linnaeus, 1758. On the lily of the valley?
Likes: 1

30.09.2009 18:17, scarit

Lilioceris merdigera L.
Likes: 1

30.09.2009 18:19, rpanin

By the way. In the mountains, I have never found low-mountain views in the subalpine and Alpine regions, but on the contrary-repeatedly. Especially for nebryas, which are successfully carried away by water during heavy rains much lower than the habitat zone. Since we have only one specimen, it can be accidental. As I understand it, there is no information that they were collected en masse at this height. So there are options smile.gif

With other Alpine nebryas, yes, there may be options ,but not with Nebria transsylvanica. This species is not tied to water in any way. It lives in Alpine meadows.
Although there are always exceptions to the rule. smile.gif

This post was edited by rpanin - 30.09.2009 18: 20
Likes: 1

30.09.2009 20:25, evk

The scorer can't be Brachinus klapperichi?

Very likely, but there's more to it than that. I want to look at the collection normally, but now I can't. Maybe I'll get there tomorrow!
Likes: 2

30.09.2009 21:16, NakaRB

Photo 12 reminds me of the Phratora leaf beetle. True, Phratora has distinct dot rows on the elytra, but the photo is not very clear....
I wonder what size this leaf beetle was ?

I didn't notice any dotted rows, and the elytra is uniformly dotted with small dots. The size of the animal is about 4 mm, maybe less...

30.09.2009 21:28, Fornax13

Please help me identify the Moscow region nutcrackers Ampedus sp.

Yes, there are problems with these ampeduses, even if the beetle is available... And only from the photo... rolleyes.gif
Likes: 1

30.09.2009 21:37, vasiliy-feoktistov

Yes, there are problems with these ampeduses, even if the beetle is available... And only from the photo... rolleyes.gif

I'll take a better picture of them tomorrow.

30.09.2009 21:59, Fornax13

They need to look at the details of the sculpture of different sections of the PRSP. (dotted lines, etc.), its pubescence, sawyers in detail. IMHO, it's easier to look at a beetle than to take a good photo of such signs wall.gif
As options:
1-type A. sanguineus
2-A. ???pomorum
Likes: 1

30.09.2009 22:04, vasiliy-feoktistov

They need to look at the details of the sculpture of different sections of the PRSP. (dotted lines, etc.), its pubescence, sawyers in detail. IMHO, it's easier to look at a beetle than to take a good photo of such signs wall.gif
As options:
1-type A. sanguineus
2-A. ??? pomorum

#1 It is more likely that even the size of A. sanguineus is (dl. 16mm), #2 will have to be determined. Thank you.

30.09.2009 22:14, NakaRB

Batch # 3
All but 22-24, 30, taken in the vicinity of Krasnoarmeysk, Moscow region.

21. 17.05.2009
user posted image

22. neighborhood of d. Semkino, Moscow region, 30.05.2009
user posted image

23. neighborhood of d. Semkino, Moscow region, 30.05.2009
user posted image

24. neighborhood of d. Semkino, Moscow region, 30.05.2009
on aspen
user posted image

25. 31.05.2009
user posted image

26. 31.05.2009
on the nettle
user posted image

27. 06.06.2009
user posted image

28. 06.06.2009
user posted image

29. 06.06.2009
user posted image

30. Moscow, Bitsevsky Forest Park, 07.06.2009
user posted image

30.09.2009 22:22, Fornax13

21-Polydrusus undatus
22-Cassida rubiginosa
23 - Prosternon tessellatum
24 - and this, in my opinion, is a real Phrathora
25-Poecilus sp. I don't see
26-Phyllobius pomaceus, semi-female
27-Nedyus quadrimaculatus

This post was edited by Fornax13-30.09.2009 22: 23
Likes: 1

30.09.2009 22:30, Evgenich

30-Possibly - Donacia vulgaris
Likes: 1

01.10.2009 6:48, evk

29-Pts. it looks like Athous haemorrhoidalis (Fabricius, 1801).
Likes: 1

01.10.2009 8:34, evk

To evk: once again to Brachinus'u
Uzbekistan, Nuratau, Anum, h=1800 m. 06.1996.
Length 9 mm

I looked at the possible options, but there are no options. As far as I understand from the photo, the color of the elytra is clearly brownish, less metallic than in most of our common species. Therefore, and for the rest of Fornax13 absolutely correctly assumed-Brachinus (Brachynidius) klapperichi Jedl.
The only thing that is confusing in the photo is the very prominent ribs of the elytra. For all my copies. they are more smoothed out. Although this may be the result of side lighting when shooting.
Likes: 1

01.10.2009 11:23, алекс 2611

 
24 - and this, in my opinion, is the real Phrathora


Well, yes, she's...
I generally admire the ability to identify by photo. For me, even the views that you can't confuse with a drunk in nature or on a pin are always problematic from photos. And some simply distinguish on the fly. I respect you.
Likes: 1

01.10.2009 11:23, Victor Titov

Batch # 3
All but 22-24, 30, taken in the vicinity of Krasnoarmeysk, Moscow region.

25 (31.05.2009) - Poecilus versicolor (Sturm, 1824) .28
(06.06.2009) - probably Athous niger (Linnaeus, 1758).
Likes: 1

01.10.2009 11:26, алекс 2611

Batch # 3
All but 22-24, 30, taken in the vicinity of Krasnoarmeysk, Moscow region.

28. 06.06.2009
user posted image




Isn't Ectinus aterrimus the case?
Likes: 1

01.10.2009 11:28, evk

25 (31.05.2009) - Poecilus versicolor (Sturm, 1824).

Well, cool! And how did you exclude P. cupreus from this photo wink.gif
Likes: 1

01.10.2009 11:37, Mantispid

Versicolor also has redheads
Likes: 1

01.10.2009 11:40, Алексей Сажнев

why isn't there a bug?

Pages: 1 ...202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210... 854

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.