E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Community and Forum → Insects identification → Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Pages: 1 ...77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85... 854

11.05.2008 20:13, Nozer

Stavropolec, bronze in the photo 67, Epicometis hirta.
Likes: 1

11.05.2008 20:30, Fornax13

That's 46 and 60 and confused smile.gif60-I don't know. 61-m. b. Protaetia (Netocia) ungarica?
62-63-Cetonia aurata, 64-I can't make out-m. b. Protaetia (Liocola) marmorata, but it's rather small. 65-probably ungarica. 66 - most likely Oxythyrea funesta, 67-Tropinota (Epicometis) hirta.
If you lied about something , please correct it.

This post was edited by Fornax13-05/11/2008 20: 58
Likes: 1

11.05.2008 22:38, Bad Den

It feels like 60 and 46 are from the tropics...

11.05.2008 22:39, Nimrod

Hello, gentlemen!
I remember everything, Mr. Necrocephalus don't worry. I don't write it yet, because I doubt it.

How did your Aphodius, Mr. Bad Den, manage to be identified?

Mr. Fornax13.
It looks like you have a female (second picture). Their sexes are different, including the width of the pronotum. In addition, it can also be circumcinctus, but for this you need to know the date, since one is spring-summer, and the second is autumn species.

Mr. Stavropolec
Likes: 4

11.05.2008 22:55, Fornax13

 
Mr. Fornax13.
It looks like you have a female (second picture). Their sexes are different, including the width of the pronotum. In addition, it can also be circumcinctus, but for this you need to know the date, since one is spring-summer, and the second is autumn species.

This is the month of October, so I originally recorded them in A. caspius. A. circumcinctus was also there, but in the spring, and they are without bumps on the frontal suture.

11.05.2008 23:06, Bad Den



How did your Aphodius, Mr. Bad Den, manage to be identified?


I haven't started working on it yet, but tomorrow I'll still install it and run it through the tables.

12.05.2008 0:01, Fornax13

I understand that intrusiveness should not be welcome, but maybe the specialists will once again look at my click on this link (post from 27.01.2008) and express their opinion? Very interesting indeed... http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=133597&st=2250

From Agrypninae after all? Probably Lanelater judaicus (Reiche & Saulcy, 1856).
Likes: 1

12.05.2008 0:22, Stavropolec

Thank you all very much! beer.gif
For controversial types, I'll try to make a better photo and post it later...
Well, what about the sawyers, can you do something?? smile.gif

12.05.2008 8:20, Mylabris

To Transilvania:
1. Prosodes sp, Samets.
3. Malachius aeneus
Likes: 1

12.05.2008 8:59, Victor Titov

From Agrypninae after all? Probably Lanelater judaicus (Reiche & Saulcy, 1856).

Thanks! I'm pretty sure it's from Agrypninae. But I do not know this type frown.gif. Can you tell me what qualifier you used to use?

12.05.2008 14:58, Buzman

To Stavropolec:
8 - Monochamus urusovi Fisch.
Likes: 1

12.05.2008 15:49, Buzman

To Stavropolec:
2, 3 - Morimus sp.
Likes: 1

12.05.2008 15:59, Buzman

To Stavropolec:
1 - Strangalia attenuata (L.)
6 - Rutpela maculata (Poda)

This post was edited by Buzman - 12.05.2008 16: 28
Likes: 1

12.05.2008 16:04, Fornax13

Thanks! I'm pretty sure it's from Agrypninae. But I do not know this type frown.gif. Can you tell me what qualifier you used to use?

On elateridae.com list of Turkish nutcrackers posted-by exclusion method smile.gif
Likes: 1

12.05.2008 16:05, bials

Help us identify clickers before the view. Taken in Moscow.
1.image: _______. jpg
2.picture: _______2_3.jpg

12.05.2008 17:02, Fornax13

1-Athous of some sort.
2 - what size is the second one?

12.05.2008 17:20, omar

Fornax13 You correctly identified your perverse cryptophagid, I forgot to unsubscribe you completely, but it seems that this original genus is now allocated to some new family.
Likes: 1

12.05.2008 17:27, Fornax13

How? Again? :-)) It seems to have been described as a separate family.
Can you tell me if it was an animal from Terr? Russia or not?
In the same place, I also collected Pselaphus kubischteki described from the same places (thanks again to S. A. Kurbatov for the definition). Here it was definitely not (somehow I'll post a photo-a funny animal).

This post was edited by Fornax13-12.05.2008 18: 00

12.05.2008 18:25, RippeR

64-like fieberi
Likes: 1

12.05.2008 23:15, Белый_Сокол

Ottakih found in the forest of the Kharkiv region...I wonder what kind of beast?
user posted image

12.05.2008 23:30, Bad Den


How did your Aphodius, Mr. Bad Den, manage to be identified?


I study the situation.
According to the "green", I got A. (Agolinus) piceus with reservations.
According to the definition of DV-it also seems to be him (in the subgenus Agrilinus). But the spread....
This is the " blunted (curved) lower apical spur on the middle tibia?"
user posted image

This post was edited by Bad Den-08.04.2018 20: 52

13.05.2008 0:32, Fornax13

What about distribution? It seems even from us piceus was, although very rarely. Doesn't Phaeaphodius go away?

13.05.2008 0:43, Bad Den

What about distribution? It seems even from us piceus was, although very rarely. Doesn't Phaeaphodius go away?

In the" green " again - tundra, taiga, Estonia, the Carpathians. Maybe you shouldn't pay much attention to it.
And in Phaeaphodius, it does not go away, since the bristles on the tops of the legs are about the same length, thick (there are some that are longer than the others (but just as thick), about 2 times, but still, it seems to me, this is not the case - I was guided by A. prodromus, which has long and short alternating).

13.05.2008 0:49, Nimrod

Likes: 3

13.05.2008 0:59, Bad Den

Unbelievable.
Agrilinus? At first, I thought so, but if the posterior corners of the pronotum are characteristically truncated, then I think it makes sense to check the theses of Aphodius (s. str)or Phaeaphodius, as already noted by Mr. Fornax13. Indeed, the nature of the structure of the platypus indicates its undoubted, if not belonging, then certainly its proximity to Agrilinus, but the bevel of the rear corners ...
You see, I told you that all sorts of burrows, sediments and pieces of dead biomass on the banks of reservoirs are great places to catch very, very interesting species!
Maybe. Although this "curvature" is very often weakly expressed (except for some characteristic species), and therefore I came to the conclusion that this characteristic can be applied to controversial species as a secondary feature.

With Phaeaphodius, everything would be fine, but the bristles on the back legs do not allow me to go down this path with confidence.
By the way, is it a male or a female? I tried to get my genitals out today, but there's nothing like them...

13.05.2008 1:11, Fornax13

Indeed, the nature of the structure of the platypus indicates its undoubted, if not belonging, then certainly its proximity to Agrilinus, but the bevel of the rear corners....

I looked at my Phaeaphodius now - rectus has a similar platypus - also 3 bumps and a curved keel in front of it. And the spur, in principle, is not much different. Tomorrow (i.e. today already) I will try to make a photo based on my own - maybe they will help in some way.

13.05.2008 1:22, Fornax13

In general, Phaeaphodius, as I understand it, is also a very small group... For example, from one point on the Street.obl. it seems like 2 species live in the same biotope, and it is near-water (in saline reservoirs - novikovi and costalis) - somehow this is not very correct... + I also have something generally obscene in my collections from the same place, but in general, in the golnaya steppe, it got out of a crack in the soil - I have no idea what it can be...

13.05.2008 7:29, bials

Please tell me what the bug is. (Moscow, approximately 2-4 mm)
picture: ____4.jpg

13.05.2008 8:38, Bad Den

Please tell me what the bug is. (Moscow, approximately 2-4 mm)

Bromius (Eumolpus) obscurus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Chrysomelidae: Eumolpinae)
Likes: 1

13.05.2008 15:41, Mylabris

to White Falcon: Abscess Beetle Meloe cicatricosus Leach.
Likes: 2

13.05.2008 18:16, NicoSander

Please help me identify the hornbill (cranked mustache) mol.gif I am a complete zero in beetles teapot.gif, but this one for some reason interested cool.gifCaught in the Vologda region. Kaduysky district Andogsky Villages on the bank of the Andogi river 10.05.2008

Pictures:
picture: DSC07078.jpg
DSC07078.jpg — (73.53к)

13.05.2008 18:50, Fornax13

Please help me identify the hornbill (cranked mustache) mol.gif I am a complete zero in beetles teapot.gif, but this one for some reason interested cool.gifCaught in the Vologda region. Kaduysky district Andogsky Villages on the bank of the Andogi river 10.05.2008

Female Platycerus, like caraboides.

13.05.2008 23:26, RippeR

think caprea, caraboides like a more western view smile.gif

14.05.2008 0:01, Fornax13

Maybe caprea, but about the "more western" I doubt very much-in the St. region.caraboides is common everywhere, and caprea is still only from the extreme NW of the region.

14.05.2008 0:14, Fornax13

Regarding Phaeaphodius-
A. (Ph.) rectus Motsch. ab. biformis Rtt.:
1-himself smile.gif
2-head,
3-w. angles of the lower leg
4-top of the lower leg
5-top of the lower leg

6 - A. (Ph.) rectus Motsch. f. typ.

7-A. (Ph.) ?novikovi Kabakov-head, prsp.
8-z. angles of prsp.

I apologize for the quality of the photo, I hope it will be possible to make it out.

This post was edited by Fornax13-14.05.2008 00: 19

Pictures:
picture: P5130047.JPG
P5130047.JPG — (95.93к)

picture: P5130050.JPG
P5130050.JPG — (123.66к)

picture: P5130048.JPG
P5130048.JPG — (71.88к)

picture: P5130047.JPG
P5130047.JPG — (133.68к)

picture: P5130049.JPG
P5130049.JPG — (62.51к)

picture: P5130048.JPG
P5130048.JPG — (135.98к)

picture: P5130054.JPG
P5130054.JPG — (106.68к)

picture: P5130055.JPG
P5130055.JPG — (96.92к)

Likes: 1

14.05.2008 8:41, Dmitry Vlasov

2NicoSander Your female antler Platycerus caprea. P. caraboides is more southern. It is localized in the Yaroslavl region, occurs in the southern half, and is rare.

15.05.2008 14:06, Nimrod

Hello, gentlemen.
Mr. Fornax13. Mr. Bad Den's Aphodius is certainly not Phaeaphodius, but something else.

Mr. NicoSander & all. It is impossible to determine exactly from such images, especially if we are talking about problematic views. Moreover, it is a female.
Here are some links. It is quite possible that the information will be useful for the future.
E_Redis
F.Iberica
Platycerus
Likes: 3

15.05.2008 15:20, Kemist

Gentlemen, please help me identify the bug! There are photos of larvae.

File/s:



download file beatle_1.bmp

size: 177.08 k
number of downloads: 514









download file Beatle_2.bmp

size: 548.89 k
number of downloads: 351









download file larva_1.bmp

size: 546.39 k
number of downloads: 412









download file larva_2.bmp

size: 573.43 k
number of downloads: 342






15.05.2008 15:44, Dmitry Vlasov

no options - chernotelka!!!
If size= 1.5 cm, then Tenebrio sp. (T. molitor?)
If-0.5-Tribolium sp.

15.05.2008 16:41, Fornax13

2NicoSander Your female antler Platycerus caprea. P. caraboides is more southern. It is localized in the Yaroslavl region, occurs in the southern half, and is rare.

Both types are indicated for the Vologda Oblast (http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/scarvlgd.htm) - so it's still hard to say.

Pages: 1 ...77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85... 854

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.