Identification of Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths)

Help with the definition.Orenburg city on light,29.08.2016 span 18 mm.

Same as above. There is only one such view.

or maybe a subspecies of ssp. centralisata?

Help me determine

Ukraine, Rivne region, May 21.
Melitaea britomartis ?

Ukraine, Rivne region, May 21.
Melitaea britomartis ?

Most likely yes, if you can judge from the picture, but maybe athalia is like that. These two species are best distinguished by their genitals.

and what criteria were used to filter out aurelia?

In my opinion, she, the female, is only more correct than quadrifaSIAata, according to the original description

You can also add it there, but it is still visually easier to recognize, at least I was not mistaken, I rechecked it with cooking. The general background is lighter, the arc spots between the lines at the bottom of the wings are beige, on the expanded space of the hind wing at the edge, there is no white field at the bottom around the anal angle, and the fringe and border holes between the lines of the pattern are light. Also, it doesn't always work, there are only dark individuals.

This is divination. Obviously, to determine for sure - only cook.

Thanks !!! And if the larvae? M. athalia yet ?

Please tell me about butterflies, probably Arctiidae. Penza region, July.

1.2.3

. Is it Amata nigricornis or Syntomis phegea?

Please tell me about butterflies, probably Arctiidae. Penza region, July.

1. Leafhopper Aphelia sp., probably paleana (Hubner, 1793), something I can't figure out with leafhoppers.

  

2. Eilema complana (Linnaeus, 1758)

Hello. Please help me identify the hawk moth.

Please help me with the definition. Sakhalin.

Please help me with the definition. Sakhalin.

I haven't even reached families yet. Colombia

Frankly, I don't even know if all of them belong to the genus Apamea (Ochsenheimer, 1816). I assume there are two on the left-Apamea scolopacina (Esper, 1788)? Bottom right-Apamea hampsoni Sugi, 1963? And not at all sure about the remaining one-Apamea commixta (Butler, 1881)?

[attachmentid()=296094]

1. Helotropha leucostigma.
2. Similar to Mesapamea secalis, but it does not reach Sakhalin.
3, 4. It is similar to Conistra vaccinii, but it is not blue in Sakhalin, which I do not agree with.
5. Cerastis leucographa.
In the second picture, of course, Ipimorpha retusa.

Below is a dipper, probably of the genus Chlorhoda.

Thank you for your valuable information. Don't you have a picture of page 41 of Seitz? It seems that my client is also there, but I only found a bad resolution, I can't make out the inscriptions

  
Conistra filipjevi Kononenko, 1978, I haven't seen it, I don't know

It seems similar, at Seitz in general it is very similar, types approximately. We will assume that it is, although described from Argentina and this is Colombia