E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Identification of Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths)

Community and ForumInsects identificationIdentification of Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths)

Pages: 1 ...886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894... 986

17.12.2018 13:03, Ольга Титова

Trying.
O. captiosanus?
Gypsonoma attrita Falkovitsh, 1965? 27.07.2018, Sakhalin. The area is not small, but I can't find a picture.

Pictures:
picture: DSC_0688____.jpg
DSC_0688____.jpg — (207.16к)

picture: DSC_0689____.jpg
DSC_0689____.jpg — (206.44к)

17.12.2018 14:16, Sergeyy

Help me determine it. You are welcome.
Belarus. Minsk region 02. 07. 2018

Pictures:
picture: IMG_0190.JPG
IMG_0190.JPG — (187.27к)

17.12.2018 16:38, Раду Кибзий

Good evening! Please tell me, is this Amata phegea? Chisinau neighborhood, June 23 and 24, 2017. Thank you in advance!

Pictures:
picture: P1400827_0.__1024_.jpg
P1400827_0.__1024_.jpg — (372.76к)

picture: P1400840_0.__1024_.jpg
P1400840_0.__1024_.jpg — (409.59к)

17.12.2018 19:19, dim-va

yes, this is fegey
Likes: 1

17.12.2018 20:22, Kharkovbut

Help me determine it. You are welcome.
Belarus. Minsk region 02. 07. 2018
Thymelicus lineola, male
Likes: 1

17.12.2018 21:26, WesternDragon

What answer do you want? You were answered once. You doubt, you will be answered again, you will doubt again. Vlad can't make a mistake in such a group. You were given the correct answer.

I just wanted a second confirmation and that was it. I doubted it, because L. monacha has a gray shape, and there are a lot of pines around. Now all doubts have disappeared. Thank you all!

17.12.2018 21:38, Sergey Rybalkin

Please help me with the cucumbers.

Pictures:
picture: DSC08098.JPG
DSC08098.JPG — (292.24к)

picture: DSC08097.JPG
DSC08097.JPG — (360.48к)

17.12.2018 22:08, MIV

I can't figure out: Xestia ditrapezium or X. triangulum? Help who can, please.
Krasnoyarsk region. All arrived at the light in late June or early July.

1.
picture: IMG_8607.jpg

2.
picture: IMG_8655.jpg

3.
picture: IMG_8657.jpg

17.12.2018 22:18, MIV

Please help me with the cucumbers.


From Gelendzhik - C. absinthii
Astrakhan, in my opinion - C. umbratica. We'll wait to see what the specialists have to say.

This post was edited by MIV-12/17/2018 22: 21

18.12.2018 12:02, Alexandr Zhakov

Please help me with the cucumbers.

Kukuli can't be identified from such photos. smile.gif , and make timid assumptions smile.gif
Where there are three from Akhtubinsk, if there were normal photos and the size is also indicated, then it would be possible to determine, and so a timid assumption that this is all Cucullia dracunculi
Likes: 1

18.12.2018 15:55, vidjl

Please help me with the cucumbers.

I agree with Alexander, the first three are Cucullia dracunculi
the last Cucullia xeranthemi
Likes: 2

18.12.2018 16:07, vidjl

I can't figure out: Xestia ditrapezium or X. triangulum? Help who can, please.
Krasnoyarsk region. All arrived at the light in late June or early July.

It seems to be 1 and 3 Xestia ditrapezium, 2-X. triangulum
Likes: 1

18.12.2018 16:54, maik

Tell me this Mompha (Mompha) ochraceella (Curtis, 1839)? Ocd. Stavropol 05-07. 2018
L-15 mm
picture: 15_Mompha__Mompha__ochraceella__Curtis__1839_.JPG
picture: 80.JPG

18.12.2018 17:13, vidjl

Trying.
O. captiosanus?
Gypsonoma attrita Falkovitsh, 1965? 27.07.2018, Sakhalin. The area is not small, but I can't find a picture.

The upper one is yes, I found the lower one in a black-and-white book, it also seems to be there, there are really no images and photos yet.
Likes: 1

18.12.2018 17:38, Alexandr Zhakov

I can't figure out: Xestia ditrapezium or X. triangulum? Help who can, please.
Krasnoyarsk region. All arrived at the light in late June or early July.
1.
2.
3.

1 и 2 Xestia triangulum
3 - Xestia ditrapezium
Likes: 1

18.12.2018 18:33, MIV

1 and 2 Xestia triangulum
3-Xestia ditrapezium


I still don't fully understand how they differ wall.gif. In X. triangulum, it seems, the Back. kr. are completely darkened, and the Front. kr. is lighter.
Sorry to intrude. Have you identified these correctly?
(I don't have any skills in preparing genitals)

1. Xestia ditrapezium
картинка: Xestia_ditrapezium___Denis_et_Schiffermuller___1775_______.____.____._______________._________________._24.06.15._leg.__.______.jpg

2. Xestia ditrapezium
картинка: Xestia_ditrapezium___Denis___Schiffermuller___1775_______.____.____._______________________._5.07.15._leg.__.______.jpg

3. Xestia triangulum
картинка: Xestia_triangulum__Hufnagel__1766__________________________________________._22.07.15._leg.__.______.jpg

This post was edited by MIV-18.12.2018 18: 35

18.12.2018 19:42, D.Alex

Please help me with the definition. Butterflies from exhibitions..The original habitat is unknown..

1) P. memnon ssp Lowii (formerly called P. lowii ) Philippines
2) P. polytes from the Philippines male!!! they don't have tails there, unlike Ty .Vietnam, female with completely different white spots on the hind wings
3) H. bolina
4) Doleschallia bisaltide
Polytes with memnon, perhaps the most common sailboats in Juvasia, they can only compete with Demoleus, which was caught even in the Dominican Republic.
The last two species-bolina and bisaltide-are very common in South Asia, I caught them in Tae, Vietnam, and Bali.
In Phuket, bolin is bred in the butterfly garden.
Likes: 2

19.12.2018 0:41, cleobis@mail.ru cleobis@mail.ru

1) P. memnon ssp Lowii (formerly called P. lowii ) Philippines
2) P. polytes from the Philippines male!!! they don't have tails there, unlike Ty .Vietnam, female with completely different white spots on the hind wings
3) H. bolina
4) Doleschallia bisaltide
Polytes with memnon, perhaps the most common sailboats in Juvasia, they can only compete with Demoleus, which was caught even in the Dominican Republic.
The last two species-bolina and bisaltide-are very common in South Asia, I caught them in Tae, Vietnam, and Bali.
In Phuket, bolin is bred in the butterfly garden.

I totally agree with Papilio memnon s. sp. lowii !

Pictures:
picture: Papilio_polytes.jpg
Papilio_polytes.jpg — (39.15к)

Likes: 1

19.12.2018 6:46, D.Alex

I totally agree with Papilio memnon s. sp. lowii !

My polites.
In female polites, even a small tail and red holes are clearly expressed. I believe it's a male

Pictures:
picture: PC190002.JPG
PC190002.JPG — (291.42к)

19.12.2018 10:02, Alexandr Zhakov

I still don't fully understand how they differ wall.gif. In X. triangulum, it seems, the Back. kr. are completely darkened, and the Front. kr. is lighter.
Sorry to intrude. Have you identified these correctly?
(I don't know how to prepare genitals)
1. Xestia ditrapezium
2. Xestia ditrapezium
3. Xestia triangulum

That's right, look at the width of the upper wings, the triangulum is wider.
There are also different scales on top of the chest. Well, the fresh ones have different colors.
Likes: 1

19.12.2018 15:09, Раду Кибзий

Hello! Please tell me, is this Vanessa cardui? Chisinau neighborhood, July 2, 2017. Thank you in advance!

Pictures:
picture: P1400853_1.__1024_.jpg
P1400853_1.__1024_.jpg — (375.82к)

picture: P1400852_1.__1024_.jpg
P1400852_1.__1024_.jpg — (471.28к)

19.12.2018 15:26, vidjl

Hello! Please tell me, is this Vanessa cardui? Chisinau neighborhood, July 2, 2017. Thank you in advance!

Polygonia c-album
Likes: 1

20.12.2018 11:22, Ольга Титова

Good evening!
I identified the lower leaflet. On the other hand, big doubts: is this a variation or a different kind? Sakhalin, fishing dates are close-the end of July.

Pictures:
picture: DSC_0692.JPG
DSC_0692.JPG — (220.36к)

20.12.2018 14:28, cleobis@mail.ru cleobis@mail.ru

My polites.
In female polites, even a small tail and red holes are clearly expressed. I believe it's a male
Dear friendsAlex (and NicoSander)! You have touched upon the variability and mimicry of the P. polytes group, to which several works are devoted.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2417203?seq=1#...an_tab_contents
http://biodiversitylab.org/papilio-polytes
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Mimetic..._fig2_277589797
At the esteemed D.Alex a good selection of P. polytes, but exactly the one that NicoSander posted is not there. I do not insist 100% that this is a female Papilio polytes alphenor fem. f. cyrus, but with a high degree of probability-this is it.
The esteemed NicoSander will have to look at her (his) belly or send her to a place where they can do it. Once again I send the posm. work http://biodiversitylab.org/papilio-polytes "RESEARCH: MOLECULAR GENETICS OF MIMICRY IN THE PAPILIO POLYTES BUTTERFLY" 2017 г.
As I already wrote, NicoSander was lucky with the posted copies.

Pictures:
picture: PapilioPolytesMimeticPolymorphism.jpg
PapilioPolytesMimeticPolymorphism.jpg — (91.28к)

Likes: 1

21.12.2018 21:05, Alexander Zarodov

Can you help me with a metal cup? MO, June.
A. pulchrina, A. jota?

picture: sovka14608x.jpg

22.12.2018 5:44, maik

These did not find all the ROC Stavropol on light 05-07. 2018
1. L - 17 mm
picture: 91.JPG
2. L-16mm
picture: 85_phalonidia_sp.JPG
3. L - 15mm
picture: 61.JPG
4. L - 16mm
picture: 90.JPG

22.12.2018 10:52, Alexandr Zhakov

These did not find all the ROC Stavropol on light 05-07. 2018
1. L - 17mm
2. L-16mm
3. L - 15mm
4. L - 16mm

1. Luquetia lobella
2. Phtheochroa cf. pulvillana
3. I don't know this one, I don't even understand the family.
4. Aethes cf. williana
Likes: 2

22.12.2018 15:42, vidjl

Can you help me with a metal cup? MO, June.
A. pulchrina, A. jota?

More like Autographa pulchrina than A. jota. Forewings with a violet-brown tint ( olive-green in jota) and more mottled than in jota, the reniform spot is less blurred, the edges are more contrasting and the tooth of the outer transverse line protrudes into the middle of the field weaker (shorter) than in jota. There is also Autographa buraetica, which is not found in your region, and this one can also be difficult to distinguish from both of the above.

This post was edited by vidjl - 22.12.2018 16: 05
Likes: 1

22.12.2018 20:49, vidjl

Good evening!
I identified the lower leaflet. On the other hand, big doubts: is this a variation or a different kind? Sakhalin, fishing dates are close-the end of July.


The lower one yes, the upper one is more complicated, a little similar to Epinotia trigonella, you also have it, but I'm not sure if it's a variation, most likely something else.
Likes: 1

22.12.2018 21:05, Сергей-Д

These did not find all the ROC Stavropol on light 05-07. 2018

 
3.I don't know this one, I don't even understand the family.

There is an assumption that this is Denisia sp.
Likes: 1

23.12.2018 12:19, ярослав

Is it Lasiommata maera (Linnaeus, 1758)? Moscow region, 20.06.1987, on a meadow in a birch grove.

Pictures:
picture: SDC16319.jpg
SDC16319.jpg — (295.39к)

picture: SDC16320.jpg
SDC16320.jpg — (301.31к)

23.12.2018 12:25, ярослав

Is it Lasiommata petrovitana (Fabricius, 1787)? Orenburg region, 13.06, 1998, in a mixed forest on a clearing.

Pictures:
picture: SDC16321.jpg
SDC16321.jpg — (285.17к)

picture: SDC16322.jpg
SDC16322.jpg — (309.05к)

23.12.2018 12:29, ярослав

And this one?Orenburg region, on a rocky mountainside, 11.06.2016

Pictures:
picture: SDC16317.jpg
SDC16317.jpg — (289.59к)

picture: SDC16318.jpg
SDC16318.jpg — (298.39к)

23.12.2018 14:12, гук

And this one?Orenburg region, on a rocky mountainside, 11.06.2016

All three of them - http://babochki-kavkaza.ru/index.php/satyr...mata-maera.html
Likes: 1

23.12.2018 15:38, Andrey Ponomarev

Hoplodrina blanda?
All M. O., Topoliny
1 31.07.2015
picture: Hoplodrina_blanda.jpg
2 1.07.2013
picture: Hoplodrina_blanda4.jpg
3 28.07.2018
picture: IMG_3015.jpg

23.12.2018 16:28, vidjl

Hoplodrina blanda?
All M. O., Poplar
1 31.07.2015
2 1.07.2013
3 28.07.2018

All three blanda.
Likes: 1

23.12.2018 17:40, svm2

All three are blanda.

Here sometimes with non-spread copies. in the hands of these do not immediately understand, so I have a slightly different opinion, maybe I'm wrong,
1-no questions
2-most likely, but for 100% spread
3 - most likely octogenaria, to remove the question spread

This post was edited by svm2 - 23.12.2018 17: 40
Likes: 1

23.12.2018 17:42, Ilia Ustiantcev

Here sometimes with non-spread copies. in the hands of these do not immediately understand, so I have a slightly different opinion, maybe I'm wrong,
1-no questions
2-most likely, but for 100% spread
3 - most likely octogenaria, to remove the question spread


What is the defining feature for distinguishing blanda from ambigua?
By the way, I agree with the third one.

23.12.2018 18:38, svm2

Well, with ambigua, I think, there were no questions at all, the most masovaya we have from May to the end of September, two generations, and this year at the end of October more than a dozen in the evening to light, the third generation or something. Pure white shining hindwings, narrower triangular forewings without a transverse band in the middle, relatively large spots. I have never had any questions with ambigua , but you can also watch mustache blanda-finely serrate-ciliate, ambigua - fasciculate
Likes: 1

23.12.2018 20:28, MIV

I would like to hear the opinion of experts about 2 scoops.
Both are defined as Xestia tecta, although they are not very similar to each other confused.gif.
The first, like, with Zap. Sayan (Ergaki), but definitely from the south of Siberia.
The second, exactly, is from the Norilsk region, ROC. Talnakh. 13.07.02.

1.
picture: Xestia_tecta__Hubner___1808________._________._______._7.07.06._leg.____________..jpg

2.
picture: Xestia_tecta__Hubner__1808__________________._____.________._13.07.02._leg.__________.jpg

Pages: 1 ...886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894... 986

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.