About tropics, merchants, and personal preferences

Prochital & ponyal "nakushalsya....."
Ya Vas Lyu... za to, chto Vy Lyu... Kozyavok... Bez soplei...
Iskrenne Vash Sinyaev (s bol´shoi bukvy...)

Kyrgyz people say, " the more you talk about your business, the less you do." in other words, other people should talk about your words. I expect more such posts from newly registered fans of Sinyaev . just let me warn you right away: tear posts don't touch me, I'm not talking about the expediency of such actions themselves, they are undoubtedly useful and deserve all praise. What I'm saying is that you don't need to show off with it. many people here do the same thing, but they don't put it on display. and that's right. because it is necessary to SHARE happiness, as Sinyaev correctly says, and not TO BOAST that you share it .

and we still have a lot of discoveries to make.

Tak Vy Kirgiz?... A Ya: Ne lyublyu Tatar, ne lyublyu Kavkaztsev, ne lyublyu Evreev & tak dalee, potomu, chto Sam: Tatarin, Kavkazetz, Evrei & tak dalee, Chukchei Lyublyu, ochen´, Uvazhayu, tozhe Horoshie Lyudi!!!... Ya ne Asiat... Russkiy Ya... Sinyaev, s Bol´shoi, blin...

Materials like the latest ones from Sinyaev and Knyazev could easily be singled out for a new topic (at least I don't recall that there was such a topic already), something like "entomological education" (so that it would be clear that this is not about teaching future professionals at the university, but about the struggle of participants forum for the elimination of entomological ignorance of the masses).

In my opinion, this topic has already been discussed there is. Only here it has not received much development.

Yes, exactly. Its name is too narrow (entomological circle), but still close to the point; and if you call it by the wording in the very first phrase of its first post ("who is on the forum who conducts educational entomological activities among the general population"), then materials like the last ones here would generally fit perfectly there. Indeed, that topic has not been updated for a long time, so, without noticing it, colleagues posted their photo reports here.

There is no doubt that such a topic will be VERY useful on the site! It is worth combining photo reports into one topic and opening a new branch-it is of an educational nature, because by and large this topic interests many fellow citizens... And to dedicate students in general is a noble thing!

Today's labor watch in the entomology sector of the Moscow State University Zoomuseum.

Pictures:

IMG_3167.jpg — (3.47мб)

Today's labor watch in the entomology sector of the Moscow State University Zoomuseum.

By the way, the second year I promise Sviridov there is something to sort out! We need to get drunk!
Besides, there are some magazines waiting for me there...

By the way, the second year I promise Sviridov there is something to sort out! We need to get drunk!
Besides, there are some magazines waiting for me there...

Come on, there's something in a bag for you, I'm already tired of tripping over it every time

Come on, there's something in a bag for you, I'm already tired of tripping over it every time

Maybe on Friday, maybe next week - will you be there? Anyway, I'll call you.

Maybe on Friday, maybe next week - will you be there? Anyway, I'll call you.

I won't be here this week, but I'll probably be on Tuesday or Wednesday now...yes you can deal with Sviridov without me

I won't be here this week, but I'll probably be on Tuesday or Wednesday now...you and Sviridov can handle it without me

Well, look - then Rita will be running errands! ;P

come-come) you've been promising for a long time!

Well, what is it? Got it started?
And now, FISHING!!! Fish from "Muddy Water"...

This is, in fact, the disappearing arapaima.

This is, in fact, the disappearing arapaima.

Sort of like the local name-piraruka.Fishing is strictly licensed.

Sort of like the local name-piraruka.Fishing is strictly licensed.

Well, Russian poachers are known all over the world.

Well, Russian poachers are known all over the world.

Well, who else has the same or similar opinion???
Your RATING is important to me!

Pictures:

My_Bear__1984.WEB.jpg — (581.19к)

Arapaima is not easy to catch, and if it is caught on the hook, in any case, it is necessary to pull out. In addition, the locals catch them purposefully, without restrictions.(speaking of poachers). Oh I would like to visit there

Well, who else has the same or similar opinion???
Your RATING is important to me!

do you want to talk about it?

It's like when I was a kid:
They have spies, we have scouts.
They're poachers, I'm a picker ....
On this forum, this topic has been raised many times. But each time, everyone agreed.
Don't start this again.

It's like when I was a kid:
They have spies, we have scouts.
They're poachers, I'm a picker ....
On this forum, this topic has been raised many times. But each time, everyone agreed.
Don't start this again.

I haven't been involved in these disputes yet.
collecting insects, whose survival strategy is a high number, and destroying large vertebrates, whose survival strategy is a high degree of adaptation with a low constant number - it is completely stupid to compare. These are two different environmental strategies, and this is discussed in the first year of any biological university. If I don't call the former poaching, then the latter, especially in relation to protected species, is certainly true. Mr. Sinyaev flaunts this, but quite unnecessarily. Undoubtedly, Mr. Sinyaev is a good collector. But this does not at all justify its consumerist attitude towards Mother Nature.

The message was edited rhopalocera.com - 27.03.2011 20: 43

I haven't been involved in these disputes yet.
collecting insects, whose survival strategy is a high number, and destroying large vertebrates, whose survival strategy is a high degree of adaptation with a low constant number - it is completely stupid to compare. These are two different environmental strategies, and this is discussed in the first year of any biological university. If I don't call the former poaching, then the latter, especially in relation to protected species, is certainly true. Mr. Sinyaev flaunts this, but quite unnecessarily. Undoubtedly, Mr. Sinyaev is a good collector. But this does not at all justify its consumerist attitude towards Mother Nature.

All the fish, with the exception of one Piranha per 10.650 kg, were released back into the Wild. We fried the piranha for three days, boiled it, etc. Very tasty... Where else are the fish going? Salt is dangerous because of parasites, the refrigerator was not taken, for some reason...
In general, you guys are oddballs.
As for the fact that "Mr. Sinyaev is not a bad collector", you are again not accurate... One of the few best, unfortunately
for you. P. S. I have been a poacher since I was 10 years old. Here the question is different: who can and who can't... And I have done more for Nature conservation than many others.
His first daughter was named Diana in honor of the Goddess of Hunting, the Patroness of the Forests and Fields in which She Hunted...

This post was edited by Viktor Sinyaev - 28.03.2011 06: 11

Pictures:

IMG_2531.jpg — (5.89 mb)


IMG_2653.jpg — (6.16мб)


DSCN0200.jpg — (306.42к)

All the fish, with the exception of one Piranha per 10.650 kg, were released back into the Wild. We fried the piranha for three days, boiled it, etc. Very tasty... Where else are the fish going? Salt is dangerous because of parasites, the refrigerator was not taken, for some reason...
In general, you guys are oddballs.
As for the fact that "Mr. Sinyaev is not a bad collector", you are again not accurate... One of the few best, unfortunately
for you. P. S. I have been a poacher since I was 10 years old. Here the question is different: who can and who can't... And I have done more for Nature conservation than many others.
His first daughter was named Diana in honor of the Goddess of Hunting, the Patroness of the Forests and Fields in which She Hunted...

If I'm not going to eat something, I don't buy it or catch it. The law of conservation of energy (it is better to save energy and not make unnecessary movements if there is enough energy). Therefore, the words "released into mother nature", and even against the background of photos of killed mammals (also, probably, only one pig was eaten for 5 days, and the rest were rotten?) they look, to put it mildly, like ordinary lies.
About oddballs-I recommend that you understand that not only you and the talker bird differ in intelligence and ingenuity, but also some other representatives of the hominid family.
What makes you think I regret being "one of the best" collectors? I understand that you take great pleasure in the fact that everyone around you is praising you, and then suddenly there is an "oddball" who does not feel admiration for your magnificent field collection. I don't feel it. Because I've never killed anyone in nature, except for butterflies (and I've never killed more of them than I personally need). Because the protection of Mother Nature begins with each of us, and if you behave in nature as if it belongs to you (and not you-to her), then you do not have my respect. such as you destroyed a Steller cow and a dodo. And they will destroy many other species.
What have you done for nature protection "more" than many others? Tell us, and we'll be happy to hear it. You see, and rehabilitate yourself in the eyes of"oddballs".

In my opinion, this dialogue is off-topic, and all the fish have been released. And I regret to note that the battle for Mother Nature, humanity has long lost. Those beautiful photos that are posted by forum colleagues are just parting echoes of the outgoing car. And whether we are thrice Drozdov, or four times Cousteau, we will not be able to do anything against the inexorably increasing population growth, which as a result leads to the catastrophic destruction of natural biotopes. Therefore, I suggest not to argue, but to travel and take more photos for the joy of colleagues. And for some, I will say that if you really love Nature so much, then aerobatics for a strong person will be a complete replacement of a net and ammonia for a camera and a notebook.
Photos online of the South East coast of Kalimantan (all taken this month):

Pictures:

kalimantan_samarind_mart2011.jpg — (4.01 mb)


east_kalimantan_mart_2011.jpg — (4.48 mb)

And I regret to note that the battle for Mother Nature, humanity has long lost.

+1.
Rather, for this nature. We will die out "in the desert", and then everything will be reborn again.

This post was edited by Seneka - 03/28/2011 10: 31

In my opinion, this dialogue is off-topic, and all the fish have been released. And I regret to note that the battle for Mother Nature, humanity has long lost. Those beautiful photos that are posted by forum colleagues are just parting echoes of the outgoing car. And whether we are thrice Drozdov, or four times Cousteau, we will not be able to do anything against the inexorably increasing population growth, which as a result leads to the catastrophic destruction of natural biotopes. Therefore, I suggest not to argue, but to travel and take more photos for the joy of colleagues. And for some, I will say that if you really love Nature so much, then aerobatics for a strong person will be a complete replacement of a net and ammonia for a camera and a notebook.
Photos online of the South East coast of Kalimantan (all taken this month):

No doubt you're right about the camera and the notebook. But. Neither DNA sequence data, nor genitalia armatures, nor wings venation can be found out from a photo, and you can't write it down in a notebook. Therefore, the necessary material will still be withdrawn from nature. Well, as for the "last car ..." This is the attitude of a consumer who can only whine, but does not want to do anything for nature - and not even because of laziness, but because he will have to give up some things. A simple example. Animal husbandry (the main scourge of modern nature, oddly enough) is a triple consumption of water, a tenfold consumption of plant resources, and a fourfold consumption of energy, as if vegetable proteins were cultivated instead of animals. Based on the peculiarities of the structure of the digestive tract, we are herbivores, eating meat is a whim, waste, luxury. Proper nutrition for Homo sapiens is different. By subjecting our bodies to the devouring of dead flesh, we contribute to the destruction of tropical forests, where livestock farms grow, water pollution, and the senseless destruction of tens of thousands of species (including insects). But also - cancer, cardiovascular diseases and various other health disorders. Giving up meat is not easy enough, but if you do this, animal husbandry will die out as unnecessary. And human health will become better. Reservoirs are self-cleaning if you do not pour slops into them...

I will add that we can easily and easily get the entire set of essential amino acids from plant foods

The message was edited rhopalocera.com - 28.03.2011 10: 34

Stas, man is still an omnivore. And for example, the lack of animal protein in children affects the development of the brain.
In addition, switching to fully plant-based food will require a much greater release of territories for acreage. And they will be released not in the countries of the "golden millard" but just in the third world countries.

And for example, the lack of animal protein in children affects the development of the brain.

+1.
I personally witnessed how one of my friends, having gone mad on the basis of religion, brought his child and even his wife to "anemia" and even to a whole bunch of diseases, excluding meat and eggs from the diet.

Stas, man is still an omnivore. And for example, the lack of animal protein in children affects the development of the brain.
In addition, switching to fully plant-based food will require a much greater release of territories for acreage. And they will be released not in the countries of the "golden millard" but just in the third world countries.

It is omnivorous, but it should not eat meat specifically after all. And the myth of underdeveloped children who do not eat meat was created by the producers of this very meat. Half of Africa's children don't get meat - but according to statistics, VOS are not oligophrenic.

Aha, and the bloodthirstiness of great apes is "proof" of this, and the frequent appeals of citizens about the abomasum ulcer.
And vitamins from tablets.

don't distort it. cows (especially males) are also bloodthirsty, but I haven't heard anything about the "rennet ulcer".

+1.
I personally witnessed how one of my friends, having gone mad on the basis of religion, brought his child and even his wife to "anemia" and even to a whole bunch of diseases, excluding meat and eggs from the diet.

exceptions only confirm the rules. we don't know what they ate - maybe there was a black bread - and-water diet. then of course . a balanced plant-based diet has never harmed anyone.

you probably need to move these messages to the appropriate topic. and then flood and offtop are obtained.

don't distort it. cows are also bloodthirsty (especially males), and I haven't heard anything about the "abomination ulcer".

Cows, however, do not eat each other. I haven't heard anything about the "rennet ulcer" either, but according to your theory, it should be based on the similarity of the digestive tract.

All these messages should really be moved to flame.

In addition to food, for your information, to saturate the multi-billion population of the planet, you still need a lot of all sorts of goodies and amenities. If you looked closely at my second photo, you would see what a homosapiens does to the earth's crust. Even the world's largest bark beetle could not have so disfigured its habitat. All the harm to nature comes from the race for economic growth, and comes from highly developed states. And whether we like it or not, the US pupaar is increasingly driving our entire herd to a dead end.

In addition to food, for your information, to saturate the multi-billion population of the planet, you still need a lot of all sorts of goodies and amenities. If you looked closely at my second photo, you would see what a homosapiens does to the earth's crust. Even the world's largest bark beetle could not have so disfigured its habitat. All the harm to nature comes from the race for economic growth, and comes from highly developed states. And whether we like it or not, the US pupaar is increasingly driving our entire herd to a dead end.

and I'm not arguing . I gave 1 (one) example.

I think that every person who is able to notice the beauty of insects and devote himself to their research cannot but love nature.
Now the "photo hunt" is becoming increasingly popular (http://www.cokesmithphototravel.com I especially liked the photo Tiger viewing, India style!) on mammals and birds. To photograph fish in their natural habitat requires expensive equipment, and in muddy river water it is impossible at all. It seems to me that fishing with the subsequent release of fish causes minimal damage to the ecosystem (if at all) and provides an opportunity to touch the secrets of the river depths.

This post was edited by chebur - 28.03.2011 12: 41

I think that every person who is able to notice the beauty of insects and devote himself to their research cannot but love nature.
Now the "photo hunt" is becoming increasingly popular (http://www.cokesmithphototravel.com I especially liked the photo Tiger viewing, India style!) on mammals and birds. To photograph fish in their natural habitat requires expensive equipment, and in muddy river water it is impossible at all. It seems to me that fishing with the subsequent release of fish causes minimal damage to the ecosystem (if at all) and provides an opportunity to touch the secrets of the river depths.

of the fish caught and released, half will rest

of the fish caught and released, half will rest

half or not half, but many will die:
http://www.sakhalin.ru/boomerang/salmon/baza/pages/6_19.htm

rhopalocera.com I support 100% the ideology of "if you don't eat, don't get it", note, not even "don't kill"! This Western concept of catch - and-let-go fishing especially cringes at me. I don't even know what to call it, mockery and humiliation of human dignity at least, I'm not talking about fish, they are soulless animals for many, well, okay, because to get it into your head that a huge "trophy" fish that was dragged with great effort all over the pond or river or sea, stunned, with a torn lip, and sometimes-and stomach, which is stupidly photographed with the "brave fisherman", and released back, accompanied by a look full of love and dignity-they say that's what I am, caught and did not regret, released!,
that this fish is full of joy and happiness, and will live more many happy years.
But in fact, all this is done even for the sake of the "high" from the "process itself", and the high is very dubious, since fishing often looks like a scene with fishing from the movie "Diamond Hand" - there is no process of searching for wild prey, the fish is almost hooked to the bourgeois, and all this is pretty much worth it moreover, since ancient times, the earner received satisfaction and harmony when he brought a trophy to the family, and this trophy, the same fish, was sometimes vital. And now these fishermen only have rods that cost so much that an African village would probably eat for a year with this money, these "brave fishermen" do not eat dandelions at all, but fish and meat, sometimes in quantities that are eaten in a month for the same African family for probably a year.
This approach to fishing, especially if the client firmly believes that this is real fishing, is the first step to quarrel with his roof
Still would have introduced this type of hunting-type "shot - and threw" )))) But in fact, this is mostly the case, and probably not in very rare cases.

So, although I support this ideology, I will say that about the fact that you can not eat meat, this is a good topic for trolling in vain, but it is bad from the point of view of human biology - you can not eat meat unless this very person leads an idle lifestyle, to put it mildly, and is quite decently rich. Because if you follow the banal (banal)))) logically, you need to eat tropical fruits, I think it's clear why, there are high-quality cereals, and all this is pretty much worth it.
And as for the problem of areas that fall out of the ecosystem due to CX, first of all, there are still quite a few areas for cereals, secondly, there is not enough for all bananas, pineapples, coconuts, mangoes and other things. In the end, if you imagine that suddenly everyone was forcibly transferred to "grass", then in the end, most of the population will simply die out. The number and centers of civilizations will return to where they originated, that is, in the tropics and extreme warm sub-tropics, and there will be no civilization as such, and there will be no hard drives, there will be no work, what will you do?))))))))

Fellow anti-poachers, be envious in other topics, please.

Regarding the use of meat - it is with it that iron enters the body in adequate quantities for hematopoiesis. Hygiene standards and tables of nutrients and calories are inappropriate to give here.
And if you look at the appearance of Stanislav himself (fortunately, we saw the photos), he clearly does not refuse meat. Yes, and from many other energetically valuable things.

Spring is coming, very soon.