RES Congress No. 14

Yes, I know about these criteria, which is why I speak so categorically. There are enough people who want to get there, but it doesn't work out how many files you don't send by mail. The list of the Higher Attestation Commission has not changed, only now it does not matter what articles and how much is sufficient for protection DS accepts.

"The list of the Higher Attestation Commission has not changed, but now it does not matter what articles and how much is sufficient for protection the DS accepts."
- I don't think. Like Zav. in graduate school, I often discuss this with Teachers. and secret. tips. They are guided by it...

and the same list is used as a basis for evaluating MEMBERS of dissent councils.

Now the HAC list is in limbo, it seems to be there, but only its powers have ended.

Okay, what about this in the topic about the Congress. And we already have Monday

"Now the HAC list is in limbo, it seems to exist, but only its powers have ended."
-- ? by whom/what?

The new version of the Regulation on the Procedure for Awarding Academic Degrees reads as follows:
"10. The main scientific results of the dissertation should be published in scientific publications.
The main scientific results of the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Science should be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and publications. The results of a PhD thesis must be published in at least one peer-reviewed journal or publication."

From the answer of the Director of the Department of Scientific and Scientific-pedagogical Personnel of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation E. K. Nechaeva at the seminar of scientific secretaries, November 11-12, 2011.

"...we will not be able to "wrap up" a publication that is not on the Vakov list, if the journal is reviewed and publishes scientific articles. There is no reason. Thus, the range of opportunities for applicants has expanded, and our headaches have increased..."

and more http://forum.yurclub.ru/index.php?showtopic=308744

thank you! what a mess.....

and the same Nechaeva writes (http://aspirantspb.ru/blog/?p=2462)

People, publish in the journals listed by the Higher Attestation Commission. No one canceled it, as no one approved it by a legal act. This is the expert opinion of the scientific community on the scientific quality of a particular periodical. And when conducting an expert examination of the applicant's attestation file (and it is not my employees who conduct it, but members of the Higher Attestation Commission expert councils), this list will first of all be guided. Moreover, until the Higher Attestation Commission has told us how to apply the new requirements in practice, we will not be able to "wrap up" a publication that is not on the Higher Attestation Commission's list, if the journal is reviewed and publishes scientific articles. There is no reason. Thus, the range of opportunities for applicants has expanded, and our headaches have increased. Therefore: all publications in journals from the HAC list are accepted, publications in other journals will be considered from the point of view of scientific reviewability of the journal (based on all the same criteria as for inclusion in the HAC list).
——-
Sincerely
, E. K. Nechaeva

and he replies that the List will be restored and adjusted: Currently, the HAC list does not exist. In accordance with paragraph 10 of the "Regulations on awarding academic degrees", the scientific results of a dissertation research should be published in peer-reviewed journals and scientific publications. Work is underway to create a list of such publications.

I wrote about how to collect money correctly. How to make a collection too. How to ask for the help of directors (rectors) too. While I'm posting what I thought up under the Charter - about individual membership, by the way, everything is well written there. We will not only process all this and send it to the congress, but we may also publish it.
I apologize for the long-winded "pamphlets", I'm taking a break from butterflies.
Amendments, additions, and issues to the Charter.
First of all, it is necessary that the Charter be available on the Internet not only on the websites of some branches, but above all on the website of the Central Council.
1. According to Chapters 3 and 4.
1) It is not clear at all what "collective membership"is. The main thing is-what kind of contribution, CONTRIBUTIONS and by what principle do they make, how do they vote? Today in the institution one director - one policy, tomorrow another-will say, why do I need REO? Today there are entomologists there, tomorrow there are none - and who will work? If it is not possible to formulate this precisely and prescribe it in the Charter, then "collective" membership should also be canceled. We have territorial branches, so you can use the term "collective member" and "branch" synonymously. Moreover, large institutions with a single "entomological management" can act as discrete departments, and within one subject of the Russian Federation, due to competitive relations and other specifics, 2 or more local departments can be organized.
2) Add new Articles:
- - - Members of the REO who sponsor scientific publications, the entomological component of which is presented and edited by members of the Society, are exempt from paying annual membership fees. (Because the ZIN told me: we can't support your publications, we don't have time to edit them. But "I" have an editorial board made up of world-famous specialists, members of the REO, and it works in general more efficiently than all the editorial boards of VAKOV journals combined).
3) Develop regulations on the printing bodies of the REO CA and REO branches, where official documents are published, among other things. Now the CA is, as it seems, an "Entomological Review", but there is information that it does not belong to the REO or does not fully belong. I can't check it out: I have to go to Moscow and look at new issues in libraries. REO members are published there on an incomprehensible principle, the editorial board works in violation of all moral norms and also skips articles of intraregional significance (the most striking example is Insects of the CC RF in the N-sk republic). About pricing for EO - "a great mystery...". As a result, the Company does not actually have its own central body. Perhaps it is easier to leave the EO to the person who now owns it (even if he sells it for 2 or 4 thousand rubles), and revive his original "Russian Entomological Review"? There are regional publications in some places, but the CA is not supported: it is necessary to specify in the Charter the obligation to support them, at least to the detriment of such Works of the ZIN or REO, which crumble after flipping through.
2. According to Chapter 5
, Article 5.1 ." The highest body of REO is the Congress of the Company" (!).
1) This is not very correct, because the congress meets once every 5 years. In fact, such a body is the Central Council headed by the Presidium. (Analogy: The highest body of the CPSU was not actually the CPSU Congress, but the Central Committee headed by the Politburo, which, if my memory serves me correctly, was elected by the Congress with the same frequency.)
2) But it should be said that the Central Executive Committee and other bodies are elected by the Congress for such and such a term; the most important organizational decisions are made by the Congress.
3) Specify the mandatory composition of delegates to the congress and the norm of representation from branches (for example, 1 delegate from 10 people). After all, all REO members cannot physically come to the congress, they cannot physically "interactively" vote, but they can elect delegates in their branches and give them their instructions. The right to vote at the congress should not be granted to all members sitting in the hall, but to delegates of branches in accordance with the norm of representation.
4) Prescribe a voting mechanism for those branches that (primarily due to the lack of special funding) cannot send delegates to the congress, but may have a certain opinion.
But now it turns out not very democratic: the congress in St. Petersburg-pass decisions that seem right to a large local group, in Moscow-similarly. And it is unrealistic to hold congresses in neutral territories. As A RESULT, THE DECISIONS OF THE CONGRESS ADOPTED IN THE TERRITORIES DOMINATED BY CROWDED BRANCHES HAVE NO LEGITIMACY.
3. According to Chapter 7. Specify that the general financial report of the REO CA should be published in the printed body of the Company (for now - "Entomological Review"), posted on the CA website and brought to the attention of the chairmen of all branches. Let people see where their contributions are going.
4. According to Chapter 8. It is not true that (Article 8.1) "branches of REO...are legal entities". Many, if not all, departments do not have such "faces". But- " maybe...".

My dear Lavr Valeryevich, you are a revolutionary father!

.. Lavr Valeryevich simply "has nothing to lose", as he was ENGAGED in SCIENCE - and will continue to DO SCIENCE, in any scenario and a whiff of" political and administrative resources "koi out of desperation (so that they are not declared parasites) invent everything new and new"on but"... the question is, do we need it?

It is quite natural that changes in REO have long matured and are necessary - after all, everything around is constantly changing and rises to new stages of scientific and technological progress, and no one in their right mind wants to return to the "typewriters". Therefore, it is more than strange to see such remnants of the past as "collective members" and "competitive members"in REO members. After all, we are not DOSAF or there OSVOD say, nafiga all indiscriminately record in REO in even very specific institutions (which in the field of entomology after the collapse of the Union left on the fingers to count on the territory of the Russian Federation...). And the members of the "competitors" - it is completely unclear with whom they compete and what benefit to society can bring at this moment a specific point... They will grow up, realize the surrounding realities, choose something for the soul, then you are welcome...

Much more useful, or let's say more real could be the members of REO koi may not have scientific regalia, but they can REALLY help REO in such a difficult time!? They could easily form some kind of board of trustees, say - where they could see firsthand WHAT their contributions are invested in. The Russian Bird Conservation Union has such a thing...

I told our social scientists about the current difficult situation, and they openly laughed at REO... In January 2011, the next congress of the Theriological Society of the Russian Federation was held in Moscow at the Moscow State University. For four days, the registration fee was 500 rubles. For this, they received a collection of theses. the program of the congress and a very decent folder with the office... Of course, they lived at their own expense, talked at sections with colleagues and like-minded people, of course, a minimum of funds was allocated for breaks and a banquet (and besides, a very large number of LOCAL "guests"came to the banquet... so the organizers had to send transport for additional "fuel" - winter is in the yard). At the same time, theriologists of the Russian Federation do not have tickets and fees, but there is a website and all events and conferences are brought to everyone who is interested.

I know people who have been members of the REO for many years, but because of their modesty, they have never participated in congresses or published their theses in the REO. Although they have a very solid number of publications and they are really good specialists in their field of entomology... And how many amateurs (among them there are even doctors of sciences and professors-techies, humanities...) koi have been interested in entomology all their lives, have good collections, travel a lot, communicate with the same amateurs (in relation to them, I don't even have the language to say amateur - well, "at least cut it") and koi don't even think about joining the REO. Wonders...

Now all state structures are obligated to open their own websites or pages on the Internet (with mandatory maintenance and updating), so why does REO practically not operate in this area? The same departments in which "teplitsa zhizn" still try to maintain their own pages... but they are also so small from the number of branches... which makes me sad... Requiring EVERY REO member to publish articles and participate in the REO congress is pure utopia. Sending at least one representative to the congress is a sound idea in principle, BUT WHERE CAN I GET MONEY for a ticket and accommodation??? At the state expense in the university, this does not shine for many... And at my own expense-but I don't have the money to get out to Moscow once again, thank God housing with friends is free... Of course, I REALLY want to communicate with LIKE-MINDED PEOPLE and FRIENDS, but alas...

This post was edited by Penzyak - 23.01.2012 12: 14

I repeat-REO is a good thing, but... I can't morally be a member of it until they explain to me-why??? SEL member-clear to receive a Note. And here is a member of the REO. Just pay 100-200-300 rubles in order to be a member of the REO, or IEO or ...O - I don't know. It smacks of fetishism. To get a crusty REO member? I do not understand what the essence of this joke is. I've been catching insects since I was 10, working in the fields since I was 15, and printing since I was 20... But I didn't quite grasp the essence of REO membership. I want to go to the congress - the goal is to see a lot of nice familiar people-maybe meet someone, take my family to Leningrad.
The situation with the price of the REO - EO organ is simply outrageous. The price and even the discussion of it disgusts me.
I will sincerely be glad if I can get out to St. Petersburg, for people living west of the Urals-visiting the congress seems to me a very correct act. Although the time is very inconvenient. August...

Ah, my dear Lavr Valeryevich, by the way, in my opinion, an exceptionally honest and very professional person. True, his struggle resembles one of the battles described by Cervantes. And honor to him and praise. And for Eversmannia and just for his honest open position. No amendments to the views of the authorities, no amendments to the PRND, conditions for grant fulfillment. Etc. husks. Just don't be too categorical. Superfluous is always superfluous.

And the congress is not a bad thing-to meet friends, once again walk along the Nevsky Prospekt. I sincerely want it

This post was edited by Yakovlev - 24.01.2012 09: 50

 
And someone wrote that you can't get into the EA. Were there any attempts to send articles there?

But it's not that you can't make it to the EO. Get through, no problem. What to break through - sent the article to the mail address, it was received, registered, reviewed, LET's SAY the article is good, so they put it on the queue. And here's where the fun begins. Look at the small print text at the end of the article " Accepted to the editor ...date". And compare. How old are the articles of provincial authors that no one pushes articles to (5-7 years each!!!), and how quickly do the articles of ZIN employees shoot out for some reason (sometimes for a couple of months!). Here is the very question about "warmed REO". Who said that EO is a private publication of ZIN employees? Get in line! Who keeps track of the order and integrity??
As for the price of an EO, I completely agree. You can find even more expensive printing houses. And all refer to the fact that entomologists do not subscribe. And raise the price to 10,000 per room, maybe then they will run?
Why is it difficult to understand that reducing the price to the real 300 rubles per room (in terms of quality, it doesn't cost more), well, up to 500 ((((( but thus increasing the number of subscribers, REO will only benefit. Absolutely no marketing and no desire to change anything.

thank you! what a mess.....

and the same Nechaeva writes (http://aspirantspb.ru/blog/?p=2462)

People, publish in the journals listed by the Higher Attestation Commission. No one canceled it, as no one approved it by a legal act. This is the expert opinion of the scientific community on the scientific quality of a particular periodical. And when conducting an expert examination of the applicant's attestation file (and it is not my employees who conduct it, but members of the Higher Attestation Commission expert councils), this list will first of all be guided. Moreover, until the Higher Attestation Commission has told us how to apply the new requirements in practice, we will not be able to "wrap up" a publication that is not on the Higher Attestation Commission's list, if the journal is reviewed and publishes scientific articles. There is no reason. Thus, the range of opportunities for applicants has expanded, and our headaches have increased. Therefore: all publications in journals from the HAC list are accepted, publications in other journals will be considered from the point of view of scientific reviewability of the journal (based on all the same criteria as for inclusion in the HAC list).
——-
Sincerely
, E. K. Nechaeva

and he replies that the List will be restored and adjusted: Currently, the HAC list does not exist. In accordance with paragraph 10 of the "Regulations on awarding academic degrees", the scientific results of a dissertation research should be published in peer-reviewed journals and scientific publications. Work is underway to create a list of such publications.

Tell me, who is knowledgeable, and how are publications in foreign publications taken into account now? Is there a list? Previously, the HAC website had such a list of foreign journals, but now what is the situation? I'm talking about those foreign journals that are considered on an equal basis with domestic ones from the HAC list for protection...

inr. Well, if they fall into citation databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, they are equated to the WAC list.
"Scientific periodicals that meet a sufficient condition, the current issues of which or their translated versions in a foreign language are included in at least one of the citation systems (bibliographic databases) Web of Science, Scopus, Web of Knowledge, Astrophysics, PubMed, Mathematics, Chemical Abstracts, Springer, Agris, GeoRef, are included in the List. " (http://vak.ed.gov.ru/ru/help_desk/list/)

In my opinion, the phrase "Scientific periodicals that satisfy a sufficient condition" is very crooked. Rating of this phrase diss. tips are very diverse. For example, members of one council told me that journals included in Scopus (for example, Nota lepidopterologica) are not included. And in the other they said that they were entering! But the journals cited in WoS are clearly included (Zootaxa, ZooKeys). Sometimes dissenters focus on the list of the Higher Attestation Commission (and that's it!). Research supervisors are often older people and do not fully understand new trends. Yes, there is a list of the Higher Attestation Commission, but what kind of Scopus, ISI ... they don't know.
Very crooked phrases lead to very contradictory conclusions, and in the end put applicants and academic secretaries in a delicate situation. I recently somehow defended that the article in Zootaxa should be included in the list. But in one of the tips, an article published in the Journal of Insect Science was thrown out of the list of his VAKOV works.
And all this is due to the fact that there is no speech therapist in VAK.

And who in general is in the Higher Attestation Commission??? If there is a speech therapist, then among the humanities. Entomologists, if any, are over 70, and those chapters are not taxonomists, but "great compilers". And there are no lepidopterologists even a mile away. What do you want, so that "some" Note ... (in their terms - "amateur") they took it into account there.
And in the list of the Higher Attestation Commission there may even be journals like "Vestnik N-skogo universiteta", if its management wants to help "their" schools and applicants. And there are some highly experimental publications that are almost unknown to anyone, except for those who hang ads on poles, such as"Term papers, diplomas, dissertations".
The mafia is the mafia, no matter what lofty ideals it adheres to.

Lavr, for Christ's sake, don't generalize. Among the VAK experts and (probably) its employees, there were and still are the most honest and intelligent people - the late parasitologist V. Gulyaev (Novosibirsk), obviously-R. V. Kamelin , the great Russian botanist. And many other honest, wonderful people.
Probably due to my own lack of education, I have a question : what does the phrase "Scientific periodicals that satisfy a sufficient condition" mean? And what the hell is this phrase likening academic advice to some Sanskrit interpreters? What, I wonder, did the author mean by this??? Working as a practical psychiatrist, having a lot of experience in lecturing on thinking disorders, I could give this phrase for students to analyze. What's it? Schizophrenia? Or just a mockery of scientific secretaries, I do not know, but I find it difficult to interpret this phrase.

I wonder if there is now an entomological society in Ukraine (in other "union" republics)? And how it differs from our REO...

"The great Russian Botanist Camelin" in narrow Virov circles became famous for supporting the conclusion about the lack of scientific value of the Virov collection and thus, among other things, contributed to the death of one of its Virov curators, a very worthy scientist, from a heart attack. So don't use that last name with reverence, please.

It is very difficult for me to react to this remark, because I do not know the situation, but I know Rudolf Vladimirovich personally. I think that he had a huge influence on me and many of my friends, recommended fantastic places in Mongolia-the result is my article with Doroshkin about the butterflies of the Black Irtysh Valley and my article with Guskova about the entommofauna of the Black Irtysh biogeographic region. I can't use this surname without respect.

Everything is complicated, of course, especially since the 2nd culprit of this Virov tragedy is no less famous biologist S. G. Inge-Vechtomov. It is difficult for me to explain what these people were guided by. Shortly before his death, the late L. A. Burmistrov said that he would never give them a hand.

It is very difficult for me to react to this remark, because I do not know the situation, but I know Rudolf Vladimirovich personally. I think that he had a huge influence on me and many of my friends, recommended fantastic places in Mongolia-the result is my article with Doroshkin about the butterflies of the Black Irtysh Valley and my article with Guskova about the entommofauna of the Black Irtysh biogeographic region. I can't use this surname without respect.

If the specifics are so interesting, then we are talking about the situation with the Pavlovsk experimental VIR station, from the lands of which the above-mentioned "experts" suggested leaving a stub that does not solve problems to VIR, and giving the rest for construction. For the sake of justice, I will say that they left the planting of perennial crops to VIRA - but the damage was still very large.
http://www.fontanka.ru/2010/09/24/117/

This is the end of the offtop.

This post was edited by PVOzerski - 24.01.2012 14: 56

Oh, the fluoride did not condense under the influence of the life-giving and invigorating cold)))

I wonder if there is now an entomological society in Ukraine (in other "union" republics)? And how it differs from our REO...

There is. I don't know how it differs. I tried to join it in March 2009, paid my dues, two years later it turned out that I hadn't been accepted yet, but they made me a membership card (a piece of paper printed on a printer with a photo), the ticket went to Kiev for approval in March 2011, and since then I've been sitting and waiting...

Wow, the procedure is even cooler than joining the European Union

But I've already joined for a long time, and now I'm sitting here thinking: maybe I should "perform"? "what do I need it for...?"

This post was edited by kovyl - 24.01.2012 22: 45

Do you want a joke (regarding the speed with which scientific information is printed in our country and in the West)? Dmitry Polikanin and I did not have time last summer to find a rare shrub in the Penza region - red dogwood (= K. alaunsky, CC RF, 2008), to transport the collected herbarium to Penza and Tolyatti (IEVB). How this material was included in the review article:
Sennikov A. N. Atlas Florae Europaea notes 18. Synonym and distribution of some native and alien species of Cotoneaster (Rosaceae) in eastern Europe and the Caucasus / / Ann. Bot. Fennici, № 48. Helsinki, 2011. P. 325-336.
I just don't have the words.... Here's how to work.

It publishes Zootaxa, ZooKeys, and Atalanta fairly quickly. Somewhat longer than Tinea, Nota lepidopterologica, Entomofauna, and Evraziatskii E. zh. In principle, Zootaxa is now an ideal journal for revision and description of new taxa. By the way, Entomofauna is a good journal for faunistics, unfortunately, it is not cited in Scopus and ISI, but it is very good for publishing large faunal lists.

... Dmitry Polikanin and I did not have time to find a rare redwood cotoneaster shrub in the Penza region last summer.... As this material was included in the review article..........
I just don't have the words.... Here's how to work.

This is a common practice when new data is inserted into a finished or sometimes already reviewed article in the checkbox that complements (but is not the defining subject) the article. For example, the material that I collected in August in the Kuril Islands was included in an article that was published in Zootaxa in October.
Absolutely nothing that makes you speechless

Morning, I'm sitting checking my mail, drinking coffee, a security guard comes in - " Oleg Alexandrovich, a young man on duty asks to see you.".. I meet them, drink coffee, look at the abstract, congratulate the young candidate of agricultural sciences (by the way, a member of the Penza Branch of REO - he studied at our agricultural Academy in graduate school), and ask them about their plans for the future... We say goodbye, leaves, everything is everyday and ordinary...
On the table, on top of the signed abstract, the ticket of a member of the REO was left lying forlornly... I didn't try to be surprised or dissuade him... sadly. I remembered with what passion he was looking around the city for a population of the greenhouse grasshopper, then we wrote a message with him in the collection, in the summer he collected erect wings, in the fall he showed me the collection...
What can I say-life goes on...

So did he just come out of the REO or did he also "tie up" with the straight-winged ones? The second would not be desirable...

Many people need a degree simply as a milestone in their career. You have received your degree - and goodbye to REO, publications, and research. And why? It's unprofitable. There is a candidate's degree, that's enough. I see on the website of the Higher Attestation Commission announcements about the protection of candidates for daytime butterflies quite often. Where are all those people? Where are their publications? Why are they even defending themselves? There are no answers. And it won't.

rhopalocera.com
Regular member
of NiNo



today, 15: 04 URL #118

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Many people need a degree simply as a milestone in their career. You have received your degree - and goodbye to REO, publications, and research. ...Why are they even defending themselves? There are no answers. And it won't.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At the Tula State Pedagogical Institute, defenses are needed for a young doctor and an elderly candidate to become professors and for their "ratings". The next day after the defense, the newly minted "scientists" are kicked out into the street for lack of bets. And even in a month they will say-who is it? I don't remember that. And if someone remains, then his lot is to plow at lectures and laboratories, there is no question of any further development of him as a "specialist".

  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At the Tula State Pedagogical Institute, defenses are needed for a young doctor and an elderly candidate to become professors and for their "ratings". The next day after the defense, the newly minted "scientists" are kicked out into the street for lack of bets. And even in a month they will say-who is it? I don't remember that. And if someone remains, then his destiny is to plow at lectures and laboratories, there is no question of any further development of him as a "specialist".

And where to put them - if there are no bids? The question is rhetorical, but..... A person wanted a degree and got it. This is the essence of graduate school. No one offered further employment. But there are postdocs, and if this is a scientist, and not a "scientist", they can quickly go to Sydney or Tokyo and continue their self-education there for a fairly good scholarship. I think that now young scientists have such opportunities. And I know a lot of examples of this. But if he is a "scientist", let him go to the street of Tula or any other city.

As promised, today I brought to the REO Presidium some of the issues raised in this forum thread. Here are the answers briefly.

1. Make a CD instead of a book of theses.
-- Not accepted. Most people want to see the book. Traditionally, they are also sent to libraries (and earlier it was also sent to RJ). As a compromise, it was decided to post books of abstracts on the website of the pdf society after the congress.

2. a list for admission to the ZIN.
-- this will not be made a general list, since all curators will be at the congress, and not in the ZIN. Anyone who wants to work in ZINA's collections should contact the curator AFTER the CONGRESS and make individual arrangements for working with the collections.
The ZIN Library (reading room) is now allowed for everyone with a passport during business hours, except on Fridays.

3. registration fee and remote participation.
-- There will be no remote participation at the congress. The registration fee is taken not for printing 1 page of abstracts, but for full participation. The mention of such a form in the 1st and 2nd letters implied that if someone pays the full fee, sends their abstracts, but is unable or unwilling to come, then the abstracts will be published, but the Organizing Committee asks to warn that the delegate will not come. Organizing the congress is a huge thankless task, and we need to know exactly how many people will attend it.

4. there is no Charter on the site.
-- The Charter will be posted after the Congress (it is likely that the Congress will make changes).

5. requirements for the availability of articles for joining the REO.
-- there are no such requirements. The entry conditions are the simplest.

6. Publication of a list of members with contacts on the REO website.
-- you can't, because it's illegal (personal information).

7. The situation with Ent. Review
- members of the editorial board say that now there is no such queue as before, communication by e-mail, the main issue is the quality of articles. But the site needs to be updated. The question of price concerns everyone, but the EA publishes not REO, but RAS (Nauka Publishing House), translates into English. yaz. another office. There will be a report on this issue at the congress.

8. it was decided to strictly adhere to the deadline for submitting abstracts and registration, otherwise it is very difficult to plan the schedule, sections, budget, etc.


Please come to the congress and we will discuss it concretely and constructively. And in a respectful tone.

I think we've gone a little off topic. Postdocs, pichducks, and other Western terms are not yet our reality. And our reality is as simple as calico underpants: Russia doesn't need science. Expensive. Science in Russia is now 70% surviving, 20% existing, and only 10% thriving. Fundamental science, alas, occupies the most important and honorable place in the same 70 %.

So what?

nothing. R. I. P.

  
6. Publication of a list of members with contacts on the REO website.
-- you can't, because it's illegal (personal information).

You can't do it automatically. But, probably, in the application form in the future it would be worth adding a checkbox: "I agree or not to publish contact information on the REO page". As for the old members of the REO, the issue of consent is easily resolved through the branches. However, the majority issue can also be resolved at the congress.

Contacts are usually indicated in the theses themselves - the same email address and place of work. If you need more, please contact us in person. Or there are separate brochures with broader information that are included in the personal package received at the conference.
Here is a list of society members by branch it would be nice.