All Insecta.pro Comments
Pages: 1 ...456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464... 627
Corrected data. Not identified → Epinotodonta leucodera / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Epinotodonta leucodera / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Anacampsis blattariella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Diachrysia stenochrysis / Tentatively identified / Vladimir Bobow → Diachrysia zosimi / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Psammotis pulveralis / Confidently identified / Tatyana Gordeeva.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Nearctic, Neotropic.
This species is identified correctly.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan, Australian.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
Corrected data. Not identified → Euploea algea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Euploea algea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Can someone tell me the Russian name of Iturgia roraria? Fabr., 1776. and Agriphilla straminella D. & Sch., 1775. Thanks .I s turgia roraria-Gorse moth
Ugums, changed.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Barsine went to synonyms.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Excuse me, did not look that female) did not consider sexual dimorphism species. I take it back
Anna, thank you very much for your kind words, it is very nice to hear: -)
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
Corrected data. Psammotis pulveralis / Vitaly Gumenuk → Pechipogo strigilata / Irina Nikulina.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
Only know this is from Borneo
Corrected data. Not identified → Glyphodes rubrocinctalis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Glyphodes rubrocinctalis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Johan, thanks for your comment! Fixed.
Included in the Red Book of the Vologda Region (2006) (3).
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
Well no one knows it but flickr which can't be deemed as a proper source, of course. Seems there the species name was signed just randomly (
The recipe is simple. It is necessary to highlight several fluorescent lamps. Using energy-saving "SLR" cold, white light within a quantity of 3 pcs. from different points (in the corners of an equilateral triangle, of which the lamp and the object in the middle). Well, then I edit accordingly (Photoshop, ACDsee, etc.) :) Better, of course highlight the circle, but as long as I do not have in ...
Such taxonomic conclusion seems most proper. Let's leave the gender by Synev, till the next catalogue issue. :)
Next page