Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575... 629
Moved.
Sure. Hurriedly put it to that. Moved to confusa.
After a week or two I will update the whole base of European species, leading to roughly the same form as on the fauna. And that really has nekuzyavo obtained with all these differences.
Although catalogue pages were not so slow as community ones, there anyway were some hitches, now fixed and pages thus got way faster.
Can it be ever identified by such shot? If not, there are clearer photos of the top of its wings, but no underside...
The main thing is for sure the small leg professionally posed by its model...
Today, in 1 hour, I caught 17 mourning birds near a thin branch of willow dripping with juice. The most interesting thing is that I poured the bait nearby (water+sugar+berries+yeast), and not a single butterfly was interested, but they flew up and flew up to the branch... Pictures:DSC04824_1.jpg — (1.73мб) DSC04831_1.jpg — (748.35к) DSC04833_1.jpg — (1.51мб) DSC04835.jpg — (626.33к)
Meh... Can't be like that.
Yep. The more, there are photos nearby identified the very C. croceus (even though it was different item and different island too, neighbor one). As for biotope, dunno, science fiction says that myrmidone prefers rocky hills...
There is a first go of comments to see at the "Community" page of the English version: http://lepidoptera.pro/community/.
Comments common pages got 3—10 times faster, depends on a subsection and a concrete one. Besides, before there could be error page shown instead of a required one with comments. Now it's fixed.
Denis, thank you for the tip-off. Indeed, for many families there is information...
Dima, don't get into an argument. Do you train for a lawyer (or even for entomogol?)? Plevako from you not poluchitstsa... You what? Do you also buy zhukof from Yakovlev?I didn't have any questions for you.
Moved to C. croceus (looking at http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9911/).
Moved to C. croceus (looking at http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9911/).
Goes to C. croceus.
Moved this and photos nearby to "identified successfully".
Yeah, can be.
Thanks. Not sure if I should leave it there, but whatever...
Thanks for approving, moved to "identified successfully".
Right, I've just screwed it up...
Seems to be Melitaea didyma, but can just be similar to. I'll check it out.
Thanks, moving to identified.
Danke, goes to P. stolida.
Now while uploading a whole archive, in case there is the same shot/caught location or date for all photos included, you may note this information once in the file uploader form, so it will be applied to all those shots.
Moved to the new species.
Moved to P. edusa.
Moved to P. edusa.
Ok, goes from P. regalis to H. costalis.
Deal, let's consider question solved.
As for Turkey and its "residents": http://lepidoptera.pro/catalog/?tax[]=6963&oc=or&om=or&oz=or&ocou=or&country[]=1012&size=s&perpage=50&order=lat, that means every beast can be there. Goes to Pieris brassicae, without gender.
Goes to A. rumicis.
Moved to A. rumicis.
Goes to M. alternata.
While admin was on vacation, he shot such too )
Moved from undetermined to A. odorata.
Moved to "uncertain".
On hold again.
Basil, thanks for the correction. Your comment has transferred to the photo page, because it relates specifically to a particular image, but not to the form itself.
Ok then, will add that in a to-do list...
Alexander, the exact location is unknown, but it is still North America ...
You probably don't need an entomological examination, but an entomological examination by a specialist from Rospotrebnadzor or the Center for Hygiene and Epidemiology...Such a survey provides information not only on the type of synanthropic insect or tick, but also on the room and m. b. control measures...
Hm, looks rather dark for that. But ok, let it be promissa. I just caught lots of sponsa this year, so. Maybe, see it in others then. Sorry.
Pieris napi male (Linnaeus, 1758).
Oh, the material is ruined for nothing. A dust collector, not a collection.YES, it's a pity, not a scientific collection, but as a decoration nothing sorry for the criticism, in the photo DSC01805.JPG the butterflies are not spread out very well. A large collection is good,but with labels it will be just fine!This post was edited by ALEKSANDER - 07/28/2011 10: 40
Moved to D. gilippus.
Goes to D. gilippus.
Ok, thanks for remarks. Moved to D. plexippus.
Goes to identified.
No
News
- 10.12.2024: Новое поле в «Поиске энтомологов»
- 05.12.2024: Insecta.pro maps: filter by taxon
- 30.11.2024: Починена ссылка и страница «Мои подписки»
New photos (24.12.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 17:30, A. Haritonov: здесь Trogoderma. У Attagenus други...
- 16:49, A. Haritonov: это вид рода Trogoderma, возможно T...
- 9:59, N. Grebennikov: Amata phegea ....
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- 20th International Insect Fair in Moscow (Russia, October 2023)
- Meanwhile, in Kotelnich
- Butterflies and music: Moonpools & Caterpillars / Nurses
