Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165... 169
Herminia tarsipennalis.
These look like male and female.
Imho, badly worn-out Ochlodes sylvanus. Look at its right antenna which curved end is so typical for Ochlodes sylvanus.
Ochlodes sylvanus.
Ochlodes sylvanus.
Ochlodes sylvanus.
Ochlodes sylvanus.
The author of the photo identified the species right, that's Diloba caeruleocephala.
The author of the photo identified the species right, that's Diloba caeruleocephala.
Aleimma loeflingiana, the pattern is very reduced but it's on an oak tree :)
Nomophila noctuella.
Nomophila noctuella.
Macroglossum stellatarum.
Identified right, male.
The pupa. Sure, this is a cocoon with a pupa inside. But I don't think cocoons have to be divided in a separate group.
Ought to be moved, species identified right.
Seems, both photos are better to be moved to uncertain pallens.:)
This is not Sedina buettneri. That's Mythimna and rather pallens. The flight period differs both as the butterfly.
This is not Sedina buettneri. That's Mythimna and rather pallens.
Same as #10532 shot: Epirrita autumnata.
Same as
Pryeria sinica.
Epascestria pustulalis.
This one too.
Taxa added, can be moved.
Species added, can be moved.
Identified.
Andrej, you may be right when trying to identify what Cydia species it is. I didn't check out Pammene. Lots of misfits suit :). Petr, might be moved to Pammene.
Cydia succedana, but "uncertain". There are few species of similar color belonged to this genus, one photo is not enough to identify it surely.
Aleimma loeflingiana.
Rather Lathronympha strigana, Vitaly's got such shot enough. :)
The species is identified wrongly, this is not Lobesia artemisiana but Eucosma, maybe, balatonana.
Antoculeora locuples.
Antoculeora locuples.
Scoliopteryx libatrix.
Dysgonia algira.
Approve the author's identifying.
That's right, can't be anything else.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
To identified :)
Compared. :) And you look at this butterfly: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/7791/.
If it's Argynnis paphia female? Hardly passes as Brenthis daphne.
To identified. There is the same butterfly at macroclub.ru, Allophyes oxyacanthae 100% sure.
This is most probably Allophyes oxyacanthae. Side angle sucks.
Mythimna ferrago.
News
- 12.10.2024: Fixed sorting/ordering errors (Gallery and Catalog sections)
- 10.10.2024: We fixed bad situation with photo captions for insect species that are not yet in the website database
- 31.08.2024: Первые итоги интеграции/переноса/дублирования Молбиола и Инсекты
New photos (19.10.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 13:24, P. Khramov: Not identified → Pseudozizeeria mah...
- 13:24, P. Khramov: / / → Pseudozizeeria maha / Con...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meantime in Japan
- Streets: insects names
- Entomologist? What kind of job is it?
- Butterflies and music: a-ha
