Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16... 30
Ypsolopha amoenella ?
Ypsolopha amoenella ?
How long will it be still unidentified? If exuvium is not necessary, then remove it.
Typo. Correctly will Paradysstroma corussaria. See. Http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/42344
What sat on that and took off. Color did not choose.
Paradysstroma corussana
Not blue, but have Kirpichnikova, as well as on the website. Sinev probably just missed it. And since Fabricius, 1787 and ending Yamanaka, 1998 it described as at least 7 people.
No spot. Just I have in mind that the 2 previous snapshot made Krajewski are made abroad.
The first representative of Russia for this type.
Closer to the mother institution.
Pieris brassicae
Cabbage like much, but a pupa. So I decided to download, and for one and dr.stadii, that almost all (except the egg) chain was.
Pieris brassicae any glitch. Subspecies did not write, just downloaded, and can not be edited
From a pupa?
Here too, the definition should be Alexander correct. The first definition of it.
Thank you Alexander! I did not think that this is determined by dribs and drabs.
Sinarella punctalis (Heiz, 1905) ?
Monopis monachella (Hubner, 1796) ?
My opinion is that it Lophomilia flaviplaga (Warren, 1912). We have it, and in the 37 region Catalogue no. But she is.
Alexander ! Shamil earlier definition have, and I just came to the same opinion, but later. So put determined the Murtazina!
Thetidia smaragdaria. Same as in http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/42262
Also inclined to this option.
I agree with the option of Basil.
Understood!
And that in the description of the picture is not recorded. Doubt what?
Update as of mats. Yuri, ideally need to catch this species and to investigate. In the instance depicted Kononenko strigula of Primorye, but on the map of areas for Primorye points for strigula not drawn only shaded area west of the Urals, which is suggestive. It is quite possible that this is closely related species, which differ only in the genitals.Other nolid its tables differ in appearance ...
With regard to color shifts. Only the author of the image, and then only with a fresh mind can say what shade a butterfly. Place this file on purpose, in order to compare with http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/42175 .. On both images no color shift, those. shades are what were at the time of the shooting.
Do not forget the new Gallery to note that this kind exist in Primorye. In general, according to Matov AY ZIN - the Russian Far East 12 species Meganola
Meganola strigula determined by analogy with the http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/42175
Pangrapta vasava Identified Matov AY ZIN
Nola confusalis ?
Papilio xuthus
1). Feed. As stated in the article http://sadvred.ru/poleznye-nasekomye/153-apanteles.html cottagers do not have to take up the sprayer. All the work for them, make them one APANTELES, while vegetables are environmentally friendly. 2). Knowing who they are. People stop to remove the same, these yellow cabbage pupa, stops them considered as pests.Someone maybe curiosity will move more ...
Dolls and rider can be removed separately, or cut out of it. And yet, and you can make a separate topic, for example dachnikov- Beneficial insects to your site - take care of them.
So the rider. Thank you, Nick!
Though there is a caterpillar, but decided to add more. The picture shows a caterpillar larvae?, Doll? (I do not know in this case is correct) of the parasite emerged from it.
Endropiodes indictinaria (Bremer, 1864) ?
Minois dryas (Scopoli, 1763)
Shirozua jonasi (Janson, 1877)
In such cases, the name written in the comments with a question mark, or boot put the point in the circle - not exactly the kind defined.
Determination confirmed Matov AY ZIN
Polygonia c-album (Linnaeus, 1758)
Promalactis enopisema ?
Alexander! It seems then too Ceratoneta christophi?
Apoda limacodes?. Rhode Apoda catalog of 40 regions absent.
No, Alexander, everything is much more banal. It's just a trim building BPI. As Ira said, Peter, too, are interested in what is the background I shoot. So if you're interested, wait il, she took off and the building, and indeed sfotat against this background.
Threw the shot Matt, he gave the same definition.
The subspecies is listed in the comments of the author. It is also indicated that the butterfly is similar to the specified type. In vain, I probably threw it here, though al. Butterfly side asserts itself, such as it is, takes place in the region. Correctly or not, she is sitting.I can not say anything about this, except that it sits on the vertical plane of the metal, which probably is not as ...
Alexander, like everything here sort through, but a little add - why in some publications or websites featured Sciota hostilis, and others. Nephopterix hostilis. Here's an explanation ... Yuri! We are talking about one and the same form. With the generic name is often confusion: different authors in the genus include species on the understanding, of course, for some of the specified ...
Alexander ! The subspecies is probably not necessary to specify, as definition is not accurate?
News
- 10.12.2024: Новое поле в «Поиске энтомологов»
- 05.12.2024: Insecta.pro maps: filter by taxon
- 30.11.2024: Починена ссылка и страница «Мои подписки»
New photos (17.12.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 22:26, P. Korzhov: Vespa orientalis (шершень вос...
- 19:25, P. Khramov: Аркадий, подскажите вменяемый источ...
- 14:15, P. Khramov: Noctuinae / Vladislav Serdyuk → Ort...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- 20th International Insect Fair in Moscow (Russia, October 2023)
- Meanwhile, in Kotelnich
- Video: Arctiidae moths can muffle bat sonar
