Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20... 30
Nemophora staudingerella (Christopg, 1881) ?
Nemophora staudingerella (Christopg, 1881) ?
Copy of http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/31220
Not doglyadel. Copy. I offer this option to remove the underside (replaced by http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/39099.,-Он I like.
Angle is somewhat unusual, but it seems that it Euthrix laeta? Buck
Nicholas! And what do you confirm this? Why do not you write the definition, since you know?
All the "cigar" is not snimesh. Yes, sometimes I rented, but only if I see inside the caterpillar and its going to take ..
I do not know, Vasily. Laying spiders found, but they are all in a sturdy white cocoon. But the bugs do not ever, but with the same sign and cocoons attelabidae seen and even shot, for example Byctiscus princeps (defined Lobanov). But attelabidae a few others. "Tube". Yes, and a lot of layers there ponamotano. In listovёrtok less.
Alexander, but sometimes spread like here and something determined. Well, I agree that there is no place for them. Against removal I do not mind. As for the butterfly, not sure of her egg-laying, but not of leaf beetles. Taken with a lime tree, it has been collapsed into a roll, like some listovёrtok and ognёvkah. After shooting wrapped back.
Fly Boloria selenis (Eversmann, 1837)
Damora sagana Doubleday, 1847
The shape of the wing is really more like a B. daphne. In the spots, especially at first. KRL. generators virtually sling - from scanned images to a specified lean variant B. ino. At B. daphne spot once torn among themselves, and Fig. just like others. Basil, I'm not saying. In an embodiment of a question mark. I like to see more people have spoken.
Brenthis ino ?
Euphydryas ichnea (Boisduval, [1833]
Looked. It seems that the genus Damophila invalid. Perhaps then it should be replaced?
If I did not buggy. there pad. On the left appears the genus Damophila, and the right kind of Coleophora. Ie This page is duplicated here http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/692. Although the right to appear species of Damophila.
In my opinion this Euphydryas ichnea (Boisduval, [1833])?
By Korshunov from P. subsolanus sometimes noticeably blue-pollination at the roots or wider. Also in the description it says that the wells are located near Orange dark dots on the outer edge of the back. KRL. But these points are not visible, but there are dark spots above and below the hole. P. pseudaegon. In this type of the female image is not found, across subspecies P. a. pseudaegon. ...
Plebejus argus (LINNAEUS, 1758) Female
Looked Alexander! In general, if you look at 37 the region, I am at your option P. cultralis amurensis (Romanoff, 1887). Dr. Nearby alternatives I would call P. ussurialis (Bremer, 1864), know a few tops priostrёnnye lane. KRL. The nature of the bond of slightly different, the general background of KRL. . So that will have to delete it. If we take al. Similar features of both species, they ...
Polygonia c-aureum (Linnaeus, 1758)
Nymphalis vaualbum
Nymphalis xanthomelas
Aporia crataegi
Alexander! For the kind of agreement, and the view ... It has been said http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/27753, if this cultralis, it was not visually defined, especially on a picture.
Alternatively Plebejus argus coreana Tutt?
Carterocephalus silvicola Meig.
Carterocephalus silvicola Meigen, 1829
I looked in the internet. I will say now that it is the male Colias eurytheme
In my painting is female.
Too like Colias eurytheme Bdv. ?
Basil! A duplication of what? After all the time and place specified.
The label has a subspecies sternizkyi. But it is not here, so I do not know, indicate it or not?
I looked briefly, found in google just one shot http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iphiclides_podalirinus Distribution of China, Tibet.
That's right, Alexander! There is no objection, on the label and it is written. This I inadvertently stuck the letter n, and that turned out podalirinus, instead podalirius L.
Neophasia menapia
The name is taken from the label. But what has to Lancaster Alabama and that it generally did not understand. Settlements or geographical point of that name in this state is not found.
Alexander, the data about the place of collection, including the name of the collector is always indicated on the label, so it is accepted in science, and it is necessary for private .What collection fees, there is really the name of the collector for anything, there is only enough sample. Everything else unless they themselves raised under the big question.
Basil, I know .. Just over the years, there Does decade - a collection or part repeatedly moved that happened to her during that time .......... As a result, not from each sample can take full infu . Somewhere in there, somewhere in there. Suggestions for possible uchtu.
Yes, and probably not someone once keep track of everything. Entomologists one, two and mute. Current work probably suffice.
The provided name is taken from the label, which lists the contents of the box. Troides taken from the labels pinned on a pin with the sample. Which of them are valid, what is not, I do not know.
Papilio aeacus kaguya Nakahara et Esaki , 1930
Papilio aeacus kaguya Nakahara et Esaki , 1930 = Troides
Others looked. Kinds. With Irina agrees that the picture Pingasa alba. Pictured is the largest foreign perevyaz.- on the front wings, it is really very smooth, smooth, less curved, which distinguishes it from dr.vidov are found. The nature of the teeth on this sling is also somewhat different from the others. Species.
Thank you, Alexander!
And how about this kind Matsumuraeses vicina Kuznetzov, 1973 http://www.jpmoth.org/Tortricidae/Olethreutinae/Matsumuraeses_vicina.html
Now from inaccurate and can be removed
Yes like everything is normal. This link is almost identical http://www.projectnoah.org/spottings/12966716/fullscreen
Neptis rivularis. With subspecies is unlikely to succeed. In the Far East, and the determinant in the internet there is, in addition Neptis rivularis bergmani Bryk other subspecies Neptis rivularis coenobita Stoll http://www.batt-ist.ru/b11_3.html/ The site's true reason neither one nor the other. Subspecies these authors have made no description? And what is the difference between these two ...
Regarding the pass. Not Shamorsky and Shamorovsky Pass
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (22.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 18:43, A. Kuzmin: Ещё несколько перепонов из Амурской...
- 15:51, A. Kuzmin: Подскажите, к кому обратиться за по...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- Entomologist? What kind of job is it?
- Streets: insects names
- Damien Hirst's great and terrible butterflies
