E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441... 497

14.03.2014 15:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27969

The recipe is simple. It is necessary to highlight several fluorescent lamps. Using energy-saving "SLR" cold, white light within a quantity of 3 pcs. from different points (in the corners of an equilateral triangle, of which the lamp and the object in the middle). Well, then I edit accordingly (Photoshop, ACDsee, etc.) :) Better, of course highlight the circle, but as long as I do not have in ...

14.03.2014 14:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27743

Corrected data. Orgyia recens → Cifuna locuples.

13.03.2014 19:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25035

Wait another opinion. It's hard to make an unambiguous decision on such "mixed" picture :)

13.03.2014 19:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27471

Corrected data. Not identified → Antheraea frithi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

13.03.2014 19:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27471

Thank you, Alexander. I put perhaps point :)

13.03.2014 18:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27033

Corrected data. Not identified → Doleschallia bisaltide / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

13.03.2014 18:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25035

Where is preferable to carry?

13.03.2014 18:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25040

Corrected data. Not identified → Prepona laertes / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

13.03.2014 18:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25039

Corrected data. Not identified → Hamadryas februa / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

13.03.2014 13:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27947

P.S. This, I pulled it from admin to light just to lay there :)

13.03.2014 12:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27947

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Not identified.

13.03.2014 12:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27947

Well I stuffed: just thought that would be translated quickly. And that could not be on the forum just write someone a photo? We must and we understand the Serbian name it :)

13.03.2014 5:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9370

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

13.03.2014 5:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3309

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

13.03.2014 4:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27947

The main "trick" that have been laid out on said butterfly resources under a different authorship snapshot same position of the legs and antennae :) Really it happens in nature?

12.03.2014 19:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Amerila omissa

It is necessary from the column "Time of flight of" transfer all the Old to the "Distribution". Sorry, I made a mistake when adding (

12.03.2014 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27956

Corrected data. Not identified → Phoebis sennae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

12.03.2014 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25034

Corrected data. Not identified → Phoebis sennae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

12.03.2014 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27955

Corrected data. Not identified → Phoebis sennae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

12.03.2014 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27955

It is my opinion.

12.03.2014 0:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27947

P.S. The genus name (if known only genus) propose to write in the "Additional information / remarks. For example, the instance output from the pupa or Determination was carried out on a photo or any other additional information" In this case, the writing will be seen not only Moderators, but all users of the site.

11.03.2014 23:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27947

Zoran, charging indeterminate species is not necessary to write only one generic name in the name field of the form. It is written in the field of the form Rebela Sp. : this should not be, and this field should be left blank. Due to the non-compliance of the problems with the moderation of the photo.

11.03.2014 23:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #23719

Corrected data. Not identified / Female → Glyphodes bivitralis / Confidently identified / Imago / Irina Nikulina.

11.03.2014 0:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Erebus caprimulgus

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

10.03.2014 20:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Numenes insignis

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

10.03.2014 17:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26996

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Papilio memnon / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

10.03.2014 15:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9023

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

10.03.2014 15:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #14246

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

10.03.2014 15:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9024

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

10.03.2014 15:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27864

Well razve SO underside removed? (Keep the question of Alexander.

10.03.2014 15:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27896

Corrected data. Not identified → Rothschildia hesperus / Tentatively identified / Alex Dumchus.

10.03.2014 15:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27896

Yes, this too is a subspecies: Rothschildia aurota speculifera (Walker, 1855) Brazil , Paraguay, Uruguay, Argentina. But I put in R. hesperus (in aurota himself strongly doubt).

10.03.2014 14:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27542

Corrected data. Not identified → Agrochola vulpecula / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.03.2014 13:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27709

Corrected data. Not identified → Niphonyx segregata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.03.2014 0:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27921

Corrected data. Melitaea cinxia / Alexsandr Martukov → Melitaea phoebe / Sergei Kotov.

10.03.2014 0:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27920

Corrected data. Melitaea cinxia / Alexsandr Martukov → Melitaea phoebe / Sergei Kotov.

09.03.2014 23:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27662

Corrected data. Not identified → Acronicta catocaloida / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.03.2014 19:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27937

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

09.03.2014 19:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #22807

Shamil, a little advice for the future raspravke rear edge of the front wing must be perpendicular to the abdomen. This is one of the basic rules: truth is not always stick to it myself :)

09.03.2014 4:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Arsenura orbignyana

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Neotropic.

09.03.2014 4:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Amerila omissa

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

09.03.2014 4:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Peridrome orbicularis

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

08.03.2014 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27919

Corrected data. Sergei Kotov → Alexsandr Martukov.

08.03.2014 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27919

Corrected data. Alexsandr Martukov → Sergei Kotov.

08.03.2014 21:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27911

Corrected data. Apatura iris / Alexsandr Martukov → Apatura ilia / Sergei Kotov.

08.03.2014 20:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21070

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

08.03.2014 13:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27911

Should ask Alexandr for another angle of this specimen (topside), here's unclear whether this has an "eye" spot or not. If does, then it's ilia, otherwise iris. Hard to make a correct ID with such angle.

08.03.2014 13:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27915

Corrected data. Argynnis adippe / Alexsandr Martukov → Argynnis aglaja / Eugene Karolinskiy.

07.03.2014 21:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27914

In the picture I think the female (could be wrong). On personal observations from L. populi just females rarely leave the trees. While males are usually at the bottom and can be taken directly from the moist soil of forest roads. Can you not?

07.03.2014 21:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27913

In L. populi usually does not come down from the trees females and males can be taken directly from the ground (very much like to sit on the dirt). It's just from personal observation. I can not understand the picture the female or male?

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.