E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Comments on insects taxa, except for the technical ones

Community and Forum → Comments on insects taxa
Show: All comments in a row. All comments, except for the technical ones.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9... 15

27.09.2015 12:50, Peter Khramov: comment on Coccinellidae

Ugums, see. To undergo treatment.

25.09.2015 16:31, Peter Khramov: comment on Orgyia antiqua

Probably, there was a view in the subgenus? Then he corrected.

25.09.2015 9:35, Maria Pozdnova: comment on Griposia aprilina

Thanks to all! I believe that with joint efforts, the determinant will work for non-specialists

23.09.2015 14:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Ceroplesini

OK

17.09.2015 9:33, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on Micomitra vitrea

Mistakenly had entered under "Distribution". Please replace with "Oriental: India (Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal).", The same source.

14.09.2015 22:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Cleonis ignobilis

Let it be as it is until the person who will undertake to oversee weevils Postavte need only a comma)))

14.09.2015 16:31, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Egira anatolica

View from Egira conspicillaris visually different, male genital can be determined even in the live state, of course with the optical zoom.

10.09.2015 20:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Stephanorrhina guttata

It is necessary here are the names of the authors describe the cause in a normal, human form. These are cases where the author's name is written "CAPSA" no ukladavayutsya any one frame.

09.09.2015 23:15, Peter Khramov: comment on Agestrata luzonica

Yes, replicated this glitch, I look. Fixed.

04.09.2015 19:59, Sergey Komochkov: comment on Dysstroma truncata

While writing a thesis on the Geometridae moths of the Tver region (Russia), I collaborated with Elena M. Antonova (Zoological Museum of Moscow State University). She was the biggest expert on Geometrids (at least for the European part of Russia). I've got problems with distinguishing Dysstroma truncata and D. citrata. From Elena M. Antonova I heard something like this: "Don't worry, you couldn't ...

03.09.2015 21:16, Peter Khramov: comment on Tolype

Not now, in the future, I think the opportunity is embedded.

31.08.2015 8:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Triphysa nervosa

Well, look. It slowly. I personally prefer more because now subspecies on the photo page is written completely (with the author and the year), but not in a truncated version :)))

30.08.2015 15:57, Peter Khramov: comment on Ypsolopha amoenella

Asus, only Asus!

30.08.2015 9:35, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Eublemma pannonica

An error in the name of the species, all the photos you want to transfer here http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/6873

24.08.2015 15:04, Alexander Belousov: comment on Ornithoptera priamus

Why do twice the same subspecies listed? Such a long list turned out.

23.08.2015 8:38, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on Zizina otis

According to this source ([9] Tree of Life (funet.fi), 2012), there is a subspecies Z. o. sangra (Moore, [1866]). Please add.

20.08.2015 11:21, Peter Khramov: comment on Araschnia levana

That tree taxa general form appeared - my oversight. Now they are removed from there. And, of course, no bindings fot the forms should not be only to taxa. He returned the pictures back. The forms are recorded only in the specification for photos or comments to her.

19.08.2015 14:56, Peter Khramov: comment on Ideopsis

Thanks for the tip, fixed.

18.08.2015 0:54, Shamil Murtazin: comment on Zygaena lonicerae

Hmm, on the wings of color - green. Interrogative. This refers to a reflection? ..

13.08.2015 21:41, Peter Khramov: comment on Hadena filigrama

H. filigrama. http://www.nhm.ac.uk/resources/research-curation/projects/lepindex/ViadocsImages/Noctuoidea/Noctuidae/Hadeninae/199A/FC-Noctuoidea-Noctuidae-Hadeninae-199A-223933.JPG

01.08.2015 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Cucullia artemisiae

Well organize the case. I've got to sample until a few such pairs))

30.07.2015 18:00, Peter Khramov: comment on Stichophthalma uemurai

With regard to review - now doing an updated tree nasekomyshey, including attendants (editing taxa base molding is locked). How to set up, if necessary, we will have to edit within the updated system.

24.07.2015 17:39, Peter Khramov: comment on Limenitis camilla

Looks like a bug of some kind. He Added.

24.07.2015 11:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on Euploea eunice

Leave - Butler described it in 1866! Felder describe real Euploea hewitsonii in 1865 !!! Everything is fine)))

20.07.2015 15:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Clossiana iphigenia

And who will decide? This case is the curator of the group who does not live on the site .....

19.07.2015 22:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Thumatha senex

We have somewhere in the same way. 16 - July took a series)

14.07.2015 14:09, Yuri Semejkin: comment on Euthrix laeta

Distribution: It is necessary to fix .... to the south of the Ussuri region. He had been Primorsky Krai.

13.07.2015 23:33, Peter Khramov: comment on Eupithecia selinata

Fixed.

11.07.2015 17:36, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Ypthima pandocus

I do not know, probably again with the option given in the literature.

11.07.2015 17:29, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Coenonympha gardetta

Yes. Peter, in the column full name = icon are not only synonymous but a combination of generic and how could result in the literature. Could not be synonymous with Linnaeus described earlier, then under this name cited in the literature.

10.07.2015 14:26, Peter Khramov: comment on Paranthrene insolitus

The fact of the matter is that this is usually a glitch in the site where there is no form of information about the Russian from Sinev. Therefore asked.

09.07.2015 11:33, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Chiasmia pluviata

Photos need to be removed.

07.07.2015 19:08, Fedor Ovechkin: comment on Eilema griseola

:)

07.07.2015 19:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Dicallomera fascelina

I cite data from Svoge trusted source and it has data on all raznousym encountered in my region. These data obobshёnnye ie suitable for the whole area. This source is not in the office. literature (it is unique) and tell me no reason. It is enough that there is a significant infa there.So I spend a private message. I feed her only once on a birch. What have in their comments to the ...

05.07.2015 14:02, Peter Khramov: comment on Chazara prieuri

Ugums.

30.06.2015 0:58, Peter Khramov: comment on Samia kikibudiamini

Done.

28.06.2015 19:45, Peter Khramov: comment on Battus philenor

Top shimmering wings?

28.06.2015 19:44, Peter Khramov: comment on Battus chalceus

People, and have someone thread alternative foty of this kind? Shtob colors more understandable. Or is it always looks like?

19.06.2015 14:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Iphiclides podalirius

It is necessary to remove from the synonyms of I. p. feisthamelii (Duponchel, 1832) available in a separate view. Reasons for this photo: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/40769

15.06.2015 18:14, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Teia

The race has no species. It is necessary to clean it up.

10.06.2015 20:54, Shamil Murtazin: comment on Phigalia pilosaria

Dolly in her land, or what?

03.06.2015 15:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Noctua orbona

Clean from the photo should be.

02.06.2015 22:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Ptycholoma lecheanum

29.05.2014 14:00, Petr Khramov "And so sometimes the mix is ​​not very fast" Just not fast :) The double page: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/11168 We must unite.

02.06.2015 13:43, Peter Khramov: comment on Borbacha punctipardaria

Yes, to do such a thing.

27.05.2015 6:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Eupithecia conterminata

I think unfairly here pared down to one person pervoopisatelya name :) In my opinion it is necessary to correct the name of the species in the Eupithecia conterminata (Lienig & Zeller, 1846) .

25.05.2015 22:46, Maria Pozdnova: comment on Colocasia coryli

Thank you!

25.05.2015 15:01, Maria Pozdnova: comment on Pheosia gnoma

Thank you!

21.05.2015 15:28, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Nemophora cupriacella

Photos should be removed.

20.05.2015 12:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on Lemyra

Probably still Lemyra maculifascia (Walker, 1855)

19.05.2015 10:26, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Pheosia fusiformis

Pheosia rimosa fusiformis Matsumura, 1921- Now correctly so, but I can not add a sub-species, and to reduce the synonyms for Pheosia rimosa Packard, 1864 This is not right :) island subspecies described from Japan.

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.