E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Community and Forum → Insects identification → Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Pages: 1 ...131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139... 854

25.12.2008 12:10, brgadr

to Vitnaz: smile.gifahead of you!
but I don't agree wink.gifwith macularius
Likes: 2

25.12.2008 12:16, Vitnaz

to Vitnaz: smile.gifahead of you!
But I don't agree with macularius wink.gif

Yes, I have doubts confused.gifabout it

25.12.2008 12:17, Liparus

There are several beetles from Kharkiv. If the quality of the photo allows, can they be identified? Thanks!


02-Ampedus melanurus (Mulsant et Guillebeau, 1855)
Likes: 1

25.12.2008 12:42, Liparus

2, 3, 4-gender

Try digging around here: http://www.biol.uni.wroc.pl/cassidae/katal...wy/stolaini.htm


weep.gifI rummaged around and didn't find anything, although the database is quite good no.gif

25.12.2008 14:12, Mylabris

Can someone help with the horses?
1+2 Trans-Ili Alatau.
3-NW Kazakhstan.

Pictures:
picture: 1.jpg
1.jpg — (102.17к)

picture: 2.jpg
2.jpg — (127.65 k)

picture: 3.jpg
3.jpg — (129.86к)

25.12.2008 14:36, RippeR

I've never seen an oculat with black elytra, and even without dotted lines, dear Ripper, maybe you can call this bug something else, well, for example Musaria affinis (subspecies at your discretion)


unfortunately I donfrown.gif't have eyepieces so there's nothing to compare them with smile.gif
I looked at the affinis-smile.gifI can't really say a subspecies, since I'm weak in their subspecies.

4 - Vadonia bipunctata

25.12.2008 15:09, akulich-sibiria

Good evening!!, That yesterday I couldn't get to the site, it looks like some kind of failures frown.gif
I have some small things lying around here, though I ask in advance for the poor quality of photos and beetles. Optics is better not to take.
1. and 2. tell me what kind of beetles. approx. 2.5 mm
picture: P6120095_.jpg
picture: P6120096_.jpg
picture: P6120099_.jpg
picture: P6120100_.jpg
3. ladybug approx. 3 mm.
picture: P6120108_.jpg
picture: P6120110_.jpg
4. ladybug approx. 4 mm.
picture: P6120112_.jpg
picture: P6120111_.jpg
5. Elephants made of coniferous wood. You can't see the view from green. what are the possible options?? There is a suggestion of Rhuncolus ater or R. elongatus
picture: P6130118_.jpg
picture: P6130117_.jpg
picture: P6130119_.jpg

This post was edited by akulich-sibiria - 25.12.2008 15: 15

25.12.2008 15:30, akulich-sibiria

I also found a couple of elephants.
1. Elephant 4.5 mm.
picture: P6120105_.jpg
picture: P6120106_.jpg
picture: P6120107_.jpg
2. 2.5 mm
picture: P6120114_.jpg
picture: P6120115_.jpg
picture: P6120116_.jpg
3 and here's another bug
picture: P6130120_.jpg
picture: P6130121_.jpg
picture: P6130122_.jpg
Thank you in advance

25.12.2008 15:31, Buzman

Ladybug 3-Hyperaspis ? campestris (Hbst., 1783)
Ladybug 4-Looks like Exochomus quadripustulatus (L., 1758)
Elephant 1-Cycloderes pilosulus (Hbst., 1795)
Elephant 2 - ? Tychius sp.

This post was edited by Buzman - 12/25/2008 15: 37
Likes: 2

25.12.2008 15:33, Liparus


5. Elephants made of coniferous wood. You can't see the view from green. what are the possible options?? There is a suggestion of Rhuncolus ater or R. elongatus


Very similar to Hexarthrum exiguum (Boheman, 1838)
Likes: 2

25.12.2008 15:51, Александрс

Thank you to everyone who responded to the call of the egregious! I didn't even expect that I would be able to get a definition to the form for most of them! Good luck to all!

If there are no objections, then here are some Kharkiv beetles that I didn't identify. Unfortunately, I don't quite know what angles are needed for what beetles. Demand what you need. Sometimes options are possible. no.gifThanks !

Pictures:
picture: 08.jpg
08.jpg — (62.35к)

picture: 08a.jpg
08a.jpg — (49.4к)

picture: 08b.jpg
08b.jpg — (58.76к)

picture: 10.jpg
10.jpg — (51.17 k)

picture: 09.jpg
09.jpg — (164.92к)

picture: 10a.jpg
10a.jpg — (106.05к)

picture: 11.jpg
11.jpg — (87.66к)

picture: 12.jpg
12.jpg — (120.36 k)

picture: 13.jpg
13.jpg — (133.8к)

25.12.2008 15:53, omar

And I thought the last elephant in white scales was Baris.

25.12.2008 15:56, omar

Alexanders, the last beetle on a green background for me - Amara equestris
Likes: 2

25.12.2008 16:04, Mylabris

To Akulich-sibiria: the first four images are representatives of bystrans (Anthicidae)
To Alexanders: 08, 08a-Donacia sp.
10-Lixus sp
11 - Mordellidae
12, 13-Harpalus sp. (the latter is similar to serripes).
Likes: 2

25.12.2008 16:45, Buzman

And I think that 12 and 13 are still Amara
Likes: 1

25.12.2008 17:02, omar

Very similar to Hexarthrum exiguum (Boheman, 1838)

He is.


And I think that 12 and 13 are still Amara

Amara of course.
Likes: 1

25.12.2008 17:03, Fornax13

Then Alexanders:
01, 04, 04a-leaf beetle-Colaphus sophiae (Schaller, 1783) (or Colaphellus, I don't know what to call it now)
08, 08a - Donacia looks very similar to dentata Hoppe, 1795
10 - Lixus algirus (Linnaeus, 1767) like.
11 - Mordella sp. If you have a full-face photo, you can try it before the view.
Likes: 1

25.12.2008 17:03, omar

Harpalus sp. (the latter is similar to serripes).

Harpalus sp. (the latter is similar to serripes).

Not similar smile.gif
Likes: 2

25.12.2008 18:13, akulich-sibiria

Very similar to Hexarthrum exiguum (Boheman, 1838)

Alas, but it has a flagellum of 7 segments, and the peculiarity of the species you have given is that the flagellum is 6 segments. Similar to R/turbatus..but the dots on the elytra are clear. On the site of Zina there is R. ater, similar like, but not where I can not find its description..Although I might be wrong

This post was edited by akulich-sibiria - 25.12.2008 18: 19

25.12.2008 19:07, алекс 2611

To Alexanders:
08, 08a-Donacia looks very similar to dentata Hoppe, 1795


It is very similar to dentata, but one thing confuses me - all my dentata are caught on the arrow leaf or chastuche, there are no exceptions. And here they are sitting on some cereals.
Likes: 1

25.12.2008 19:49, Александрс

It is very similar to dentata, but one thing confuses me - all my dentata are caught on the arrow leaf or chastuche, there are no exceptions. And here they are sitting on some cereals.



Thanks! Don't let it bother you. They really sat on the arrowhead, but the photos that I shot up to my neck in water and without a tripod are below average in quality, which, as I understand it, is not suitable for determining. I had to get out on the bank, sit down next to him and ask a friend to take a look at the beetles (and there were several hundred of them) Some of them sat next to me, I don't know what, I'm not a botanist, although I think that the last two are not cereals. So I took a picture of them.

Thank you all so much for the definition!
Likes: 1

25.12.2008 20:01, Александрс

Then Alexanders:
01, 04, 04a-leaf beetle-Colaphus sophiae (Schaller, 1783) (or Colaphellus, I don't know what to call it now)
08, 08a - Donacia looks very similar to dentata Hoppe, 1795
10 - Lixus algirus (Linnaeus, 1767) like.
11 - Mordella sp. If you have a full-face photo, you can try it before the view.



Thank you very much! I guessed 04 was Colaphus sophiae, but I didn't think 01 looked like them. However, all my guesses, as in the case of dentata, would have remained guesses without your confirmation. You can also guess on coffee grounds... smile.gif Unfortunately, I didn't find Mordella in the FAS. And I was wrong with Lixus. I had him listed as pulverulentus. Thanks again to everyone!

25.12.2008 20:38, omar

Alas, but it has a flagellum of 7 segments, and the peculiarity of the species you have given is that the flagellum is 6 segments. Similar to R/turbatus..but the dots on the elytra are clear. On the site of Zina there is R. ater, similar like, but not where I can not find its description..Although I might be wrong

Honestly, someone somewhere vykdadyvali scan in excellent quality Lukyanovich on these beetles in the Fauna of the USSR. The generic names, of course, have almost all changed, but the tables work perfectly. I printed it out for myself and forgot where I got it. I think Fornax posted it. Also here http://claude.schott.free.fr/Cossoninae/cossoninae-PL2.jpg related images

This post was edited by omar - 12/25/2008 20: 59
Likes: 1

25.12.2008 22:38, Андреас

"How do you do?" "I have only the Cantharidae left: smile.gif

Pictures:
picture: _282_.JPG
_282_.JPG — (132.32 k)

picture: _81_.JPG
_81_.JPG — (140.21 k)

picture: _17_.JPG
_17_.JPG — (131.96к)

picture: _53_.JPG
_53_.JPG — (75.27к)

picture: _84_.JPG
_84_.JPG — (126.61 k)

picture: _256_.JPG
_256_.JPG — (116.37к)

25.12.2008 23:46, Archypus

Can someone help with the horses?
1+2 Trans-Ili Alatau.
3-NW Kazakhstan.


1. Cicindela turkestanica
2. C. albopilosa
3. C. campestris should be a subspecies of pontica

I reviewed it again, but corrected it anyway

This post was edited by Archypus - 12/28/2008 23: 08
Likes: 1

25.12.2008 23:50, Liparus

There are several beetles from Kharkiv. If the quality of the photo allows, can they be identified? Thanks!


in the photo at the very top of your leaf eaters :
1, 4 and 4a are Colaphellus sophiae (Schaller, 1783)

This post was edited by Liparus - 12/25/2008 23: 54

26.12.2008 8:59, Serg Svetlov

unfortunately I donfrown.gif't have eyepieces so there's nothing to compare them with smile.gif
I looked at the affinis-smile.gifI can't really say a subspecies, since I'm weak in their subspecies.

4 - Vadonia bipunctata

I'm sorry,it was me,smile.gif, come to Kolchugino in August, I'll give it to you, just like that
Likes: 1

26.12.2008 13:20, Buzman

Likes: 1

26.12.2008 14:10, akulich-sibiria

Honestly, someone somewhere vykdadyvali scan in excellent quality Lukyanovich on these beetles in the Fauna of the USSR. The generic names, of course, have almost all changed, but the tables work perfectly. I printed it out for myself and forgot where I got it. I think Fornax posted it. Also here http://claude.schott.free.fr/Cossoninae/cossoninae-PL2.jpg related images
[/quote]
Thank you very much, but in my case, I would be very much helped by the definitions of theses or descriptions of elephants of this genus. Since they are all very similar in appearance smile.gif

26.12.2008 14:19, guest: Necrocephalus

Likes: 3

26.12.2008 14:49, Dmitry Vlasov

Lukyanovich's article is certainly not bad... but there is no one page!!! just the definition of the genus Rhyncolus!!!

26.12.2008 15:19, Necrocephalus

Lukyanovich's article is certainly not bad... but there is no one page!!! just the definition of the genus Rhyncolus!!!

And really no...
I just noticed it myself...
And, by the way,I'm not the author of the scan. I just gave a link to an article on the ZIN website.

This post was edited by Necrocephalus - 12/27/2008 12: 59

27.12.2008 13:03, Андреас

- hello! - I have the last bug left (probably from the Cantharidae family):

Pictures:
picture: _128_.JPG
_128_.JPG — (140.68 k)

27.12.2008 16:00, Fornax13

- hello! - I have the last bug left (probably from the Cantharidae family):

No, this malashka such-Anthocomus ? equestris.
Likes: 1

27.12.2008 21:11, NakaRB

Halyzia sedecimguttata?

user posted image

27.12.2008 22:07, Liparus

Beetles of the Kharkiv region.
According to the law of meannesssmile.gif, I had to make a mistake in the definition somewhere? teapot.gif
names on the photos themselves. umnik.gif

confused.gif

This post was edited by Liparus - 07.01.2009 13: 23

28.12.2008 1:42, Александрс

Another Kharkiv bug was discovered. Please identify me and thank you!

Pictures:
picture: 14.jpg
14.jpg — (64.29к)

28.12.2008 21:27, Stavropolec

Please help with barbels.... confused.gif Are
the Agapanthi all of the same species????

Pictures:
picture: 3.jpg
3.jpg — (24.24 k)

picture: 6__2_.jpg
6__2_.jpg — (142.09к)

29.12.2008 9:13, brgadr

Beetles of the Kharkiv region. cool.gif umnik.gif
According to the law of meanness wall.gif(as always no.gif) smile.gif I had to make a mistake in the definition somewhere? ...

For weevils:
1-agree
2 (and 4, which is the same) - agree
3-agree
5-Barypeithes pellucidus (Boheman, 1834), most likely
6-agree
7 - agree
8-Rhinusa neta (Germar, 1821) (=Gymnetron netum)
9-agree
10-Polydrusus pilifer Hochhuth, 1847 (see shoulders - not sloping)
11-Sitona puncticollis Stephens, 1831
12, 13, 14, 15 - I agree
So it's not that bad smile.gif
Likes: 5

29.12.2008 10:24, Fornax13

Another Kharkiv bug was discovered. Please identify me and thank you!

It's a bit heavy from this angle... Maybe Lema cyanella. Looks like it?
Likes: 1

Pages: 1 ...131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139... 854

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.