Insecta.pro → Catalog Gallery Taxonomy References Maps Community More

✖

Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Community and Forum → Insects identification → Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Pages: 1 ...175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183... 854

23.07.2009 20:11, Bad Den

which instance is suspected and why?

I would say that # 4 is M. sutor
The rest are M. galloprovincialis pistor

Likes: 1

23.07.2009 20:13, Алексей Сажнев

03.jpg

I would say it is a female Monochamus galloprovincialis pistor (Germar, 1818)

Likes: 1

23.07.2009 20:19, Bad Den

Here they are rich:

http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=153639

Likes: 1

23.07.2009 20:25, Sungaya

Here they are rich:
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=153639

only half of the images don't work there...

23.07.2009 20:27, Sungaya

if I take a bigger picture of the shields of the copies that were in the very first photo, will it help to clarify the definition?

23.07.2009 20:28, Bad Den

only half of the images don't work there...
and why?

Habitually

I've seen a lot of them

Likes: 1

23.07.2009 20:33, Алексей Сажнев

On the dashboard?

well, not only, there is no indentation and the shape of the shield is not urussovi, on the shield and habitually the view is also more like haloprovincialis

Likes: 1

24.07.2009 11:48, Андреас

"People! - Just insanely urgently need a definition of this khrushchik-Kuzka most likely from the Moscow region, which was sent from Moscow to our Institute to my friend - "agronomist".
- The size is somewhere around 1.5 cm.
With respect and hope, Andreas.

Pictures:
image: ___. JPG

___.JPG — (137.17к)

picture: _____1_.JPG

_____1_.JPG — (133.64к)

picture: _____2_.JPG

_____2_.JPG — (154.55 k)

picture: _____3_.JPG

_____3_.JPG — (130.58 k)

24.07.2009 12:08, guest: Anthrenus

Anomala dubia-meadow grasshopper.

Likes: 1

24.07.2009 12:17, Алексей Сажнев

Anomala dubia (Scopoli, 1763) from Rutelinae, is it harmful in MO?

Likes: 1

24.07.2009 13:29, akulich-sibiria

good evening.
1. Krasnoyarsk, Karaulsetsky forestry district
picture: IMG_8832_.jpg

2. there is also Pterost.(Petrophilus) ehnbergi or Pterost.(Petrophilus)monticoloides?? from this series?
picture: IMG_8835_.jpg

3. ibid.

4. Khakassia Gaurotes virginea ?
picture: IMG_8847_.jpg

5. has long been identified as Acmaeops septentrionis...caught in the north, near Igarka
picture: IMG_8831_.jpg

6. Acmaeops smaragdula ??zap. Sayans
picture: IMG_8852_.jpg

7. Gnathacmaeops protensis?? Zap.Sayans
picture: IMG_8850_.jpg

8.Strangalia arcuata ??Khakassia
picture: IMG_8846_.jpg

9.Leptura aetiops?? Khakassia
picture: IMG_8840_.jpg

10. Anastrangalia sequensi ?? Khakassia
picture: IMG_8843_.jpg

11.??Khakassia
picture: IMG_8842_.jpg

12 is also probably some kind of Acmaeops ??
picture: IMG_8830_.jpg

24.07.2009 13:30, Guest

Anomala dubia (Scopoli, 1763) from Rutelinae, is it harmful in MO?

The species is widespread almost everywhere in central Russia. But I hear something about its" harm " for the first time.

Likes: 1

24.07.2009 13:34, Bad Den

2 akulich-sibiria:
№3 - Macroleptura thoracica

Likes: 1

24.07.2009 13:50, akulich-sibiria

2 akulich-sibiria:
№3 - Macroleptura thoracica

that is, in this species, the elytra can be black or red?

24.07.2009 14:03, Guest

that is, in this species, the elytra can be black or red?

Sometimes they're all black... They are very different in the ratio of red and black, and all color forms are often found together.

24.07.2009 14:26, Алексей Сажнев

I would say so:

3. Leptura (Macroleptura) thoracica Creutzer, 1799
4. Carilia virginea aemula (Mannerheim, 1852)
5. Acmaeops septentrionis (Thomson, 1866) apparently
6. Acmaeops smaragdulus (Fabricius, 1792) however, the pronotum is poorly visible, possibly angusticollis (Gebler, 1833)
7. Gnathacmaeops pratensis (Laicharting, 1784)
8. Strangalia attenuata (Linnaeus, 1758) male
9. Leptura (s. str.) aethiops Poda 1761
10. I would agree with Anastrangalia sequensi (Reitter, 1898)
11. Anastrangalia may also be sequensi (Reitter, 1898)
12. Acmaeops sp. can septentrionis (Thomson, 1866)

Likes: 1

24.07.2009 16:34, scarit

To akulich-siberia:
photo 2 - Pterost.(Petrophilus) magus
In 1 photo Poecilus, looks like lepidus. He has the first 2 segments of the antennae of what color?
10 and 11 - Anastrang. sequensi
6-most likely Acmaeops angusticollis

Likes: 1

25.07.2009 12:15, akulich-sibiria

under No. 1 with all the black segments of the antennae. It is 12 mm
picture: IMG_8833_.jpg

25.07.2009 13:42, akulich-sibiria

1. asaphidion?? Krasnoyarsk
picture: IMG_8954_.jpg

2.Pt. punctatus? South of the Krasnoyarsk Territory
picture: IMG_8955_.jpg

3. Pt.eschscholtzi?? Khakassia
picture: IMG_8956_.jpg

4.Pt.lepidus?? Khakassia
picture: IMG_8957_.jpg

5. identified as Pt. strenuus Khakassia
picture: IMG_8958_.jpg

6. something also from Pterostichus??...Krasnoyarsk
picture: IMG_8959_.jpg

7. I think of the same kind, Krasnoyarsk
picture: IMG_8960_.jpg

8. IS THIS Pt. sericeus?? I'm confusing them with lepidus
picture: IMG_8961_.jpg

9. Pt. melanarius ?? oba khakassia
picture: IMG_8962_.jpg

25.07.2009 16:22, Алексей Сажнев

I'll try to comment on the latest photos:

1. Asaphidion sp.
2. Poecilus (s.str.) punctulatus (Schaller, 1783)
3. Pterostichus (Platysma) eschscholtzi Germar, 1824
4. Poecilus (s.str.) lepidus Leske, 1785
5. maybe something from Amara
7. Platynus sp.
8. Poecilus (s.str.) sericeus Fischer de Waldheim, 1823
9. Pterostichus melanarius (Illiger, 1798)

Likes: 1

25.07.2009 16:55, kut

Tell me what kind of bug it is. On young willow shoots. In large numbers. Moscow oblast. 23.7.9. Thank you!
picture: P7238626.JPG

This post was edited by kut-25.07.2009 16: 56

25.07.2009 17:23, Алексей Сажнев

Chrysomela possibly populi

Likes: 1

25.07.2009 17:53, scarit

To Kut:
Chrysomela populi, it has the tops of the nadcr.blackened out.

Likes: 1

25.07.2009 18:01, scarit

To akulich:
1. Asaphidion pallipes Duft.
3.Pterostichus eschscholtzii Germ.
4. Poecilus fortipes
5. Amara sp. (you can't just see them from the photo)
6. Similar to Stenolophus

26.07.2009 9:50, Liparus

Tell me and in Europe they collect such small things as we have,I mean 5 mm beetles

26.07.2009 10:12, Алексей Сажнев

Of course they collect, the most" brutal " (in a good sense) entomologists in my opinion are the Germans, Czechs, and of course the Russians ))

26.07.2009 11:58, Fornax13

2 akulich-sibiria:

6-check for Synuchus vivalis

26.07.2009 13:33, Aaata

Of course they collect, the most" brutal " (in a good sense) entomologists in my opinion are the Germans, Czechs, and of course the Russians ))

The Japanese were unfairly forgotten! They compete with the Germans, especially in matters of pedantry and accuracy. They, perhaps, more often than others are engaged in all sorts of scales, coleoptera and other "trifles".

In general, in my opinion, the smallest insects are just the most interesting. Moreover, their diversity is enormous, and they are the least studied, and the species unknown to science are mainly among them ...

Likes: 1

26.07.2009 14:10, phlomis

These beetles are regularly found in potbelly flowers in the Usmanka River (Voronezh region). Is it possible to determine?

26.07.2009 14:52, lepidopterolog

This is Donacia aquatica (Chrysomelidae: Donaciinae), I also saw them en masse in the Voronezh Region, on Usmanka

26.07.2009 16:41, Fornax13

There are a lot of indentations - it looks more like Donacia bicolor

26.07.2009 17:15, akulich-sibiria

Tell me and in Europe they collect such small things as we have,I mean 5 mm beetles

I don't even know what to tell you. I'm actually from the Asian part, from Siberia

Likes: 1

26.07.2009 18:31, phlomis

Let it be Donacia sp.

26.07.2009 21:21, Liparus

The Japanese were unfairly forgotten! They compete with the Germans, especially in matters of pedantry and accuracy. They, perhaps, more often than others are engaged in all sorts of scales, coleoptera and other "trifles".

In general, in my opinion, the smallest insects are just the most interesting. Moreover, their diversity is enormous, and they are least studied, and species unknown to science are mostly among them…

What I mean is, most people just like bigger things,and many people prefer to exchange big things over small things,or am I wrong?
But I like something rare, let it be 1 mm, but it is well neatly spread out on the die

26.07.2009 22:46, Liparus

help today's beetles identify
IMG_2300 and IMG_2301 sitting under a tortilla next to each other (male and female?)

This post was edited by Liparus - 27.07.2009 00: 54

Pictures:
picture: IMG_2150.JPG

IMG_2150.JPG — (229.22к)

picture: IMG_2301.JPG

IMG_2301.JPG — (128.99к)

picture: IMG_2302.JPG

IMG_2302.JPG — (137.8к)

picture: IMG_2300.JPG

IMG_2300.JPG — (130.02к)

27.07.2009 7:39, scarit

1. Geotrupes sp.
The other 3 are Onthophagus

27.07.2009 9:33, KingSnake

Help us determine the type

Pictures:
picture: SG203163small.jpg

SG203163small.jpg — (135.82к)

27.07.2009 9:36, Liparus

may number 12 and 4 - Onthophagus nuchicornis (Linnaeus, 1758)

27.07.2009 10:45, scarit

To King-Snake: similar to Lagria hirta (Lagriidae)

Likes: 1

27.07.2009 10:46, Алексей Сажнев

To KingSnake:

Lagria hirta (L., 1758)

Likes: 1

Pages: 1 ...175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183... 854

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

News

24.11.2024: «Поиск энтомологов» работает в полном объеме!
24.11.2024: We fixed an error in displaying the website in the "gray" color scheme
17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».