Identification of Diptera (flies, mosquitoes, etc.)

If you can, please send us more photos of the sirfid.

Without "jokes" or "with jokes"?
Well, anyway, what are the flies? PLZ. Novosibirsk

This post was edited by Justus - 04.10.2009 13: 42

Pictures:

624.jpg — (117.86к)


626.jpg — (109.01 k)


627.jpg — (112.93к)

Without "jokes" or "with jokes"?
Well, anyway, what's up? PLZ.

"z jokes", clear horseradish. Life is already so boring and predictable, at least here to have fun...

Didn't inspire you? Then, this? PLZ

Pictures:

___3115.jpg — (132.36к)

Didn't inspire you? Then, this? PLZ

Phasia sp. visibly

If you can, please send us more photos of the sirfid. I enjoy it immensely.

I'm trying... (with the last of my strength, though... )
Help, PLZ, with a hint in determining the following flies (if, of course, this does not prevent you from "having great fun" )
"Significantly increasing the chances of correct determination", I will add: all from Novosibirsk.

This post was edited by Justus - 06.10.2009 10:00 am

Pictures:

___6756.jpg — (98.23к)


___67561.jpg — (138.71к)

And...?
"Defined", and ...?
What is the result of the definition?
It seems to me that the intrigue will not last long, it has a shelf life (see on the package) of 4-5 days. (yes, and even then, in the refrigerator).
"Defined", and ...?

After all, I wrote that this is shirkhan,.... and that I didn't expect to catch her.

This post was edited by grottan - 06.10.2009 16: 16

But who in the photos in the post 833 would like to find out for himself

Without "jokes" or "with jokes"?
Well, anyway, what are the flies? PLZ. Novosibirsk

The first Helophilus sp.(they are just defined), the second Dasysyrphus tricinctus (Fallén 1817), well, in tahini I have a tree

Maybe someone has information about the species Lejota ruficornis (Zetterstedt, 1843) ..(I mean the history of discovery, trophic connections), drop a line if you are not too lazy, well, a link to the literature pliz

hello. tell me what kind of flies came out of the galas of the poplar aphid genus Pemphigus sp. there is an assumption that this is the genus Leucopis sp. Is there any literature on this type? And specialists. Very necessary!!


2.

Maybe someone has information about the species Lejota ruficornis (Zetterstedt, 1843) ..(I mean the history of discovery, trophic connections), drop a line if you are not too lazy, well, a link to the literature of pliz

The most "direct" way – about the "discovery history" - is to look, for starters, at Zetterstedt. The information you are interested in is contained in the second and eighth volumes (p. 847 and p. 3187, respectively). Unfortunately, I don't have these volumes. In the 11th volume, the cat. I have, there is a section of additions to the preid. There is only one phrase about Psilota ruficornis: "D. Holmgren discovered it at Upsala" (Zetterstedt J. W. Diptera Scandinaviae: Disposita et descripta. Lundae, 1852. T. 11. P. 4307).

Tabanus. Can someone determine the type?
Moscow region, Ramenskiy district, Khripan, June.

Pictures:

10.06.2009_DSC04902.jpg — (243.08к)

very similar to Tabanus tarandinus

very similar to Tabanus tarandinus

Initially, I also defined it this way, but then I began to doubt: The Moscow region is not tundra

1. A fly from the Moscow region. If it is difficult to determine the species, then, at least, the genus.
MO. Ramenskiy district, Khripan.

Pictures:

29.07.2009__DSC00187.jpg — (170.71к)

Initially, I also defined it this way, but then I began to doubt: The Moscow region is not a tundra

About the tundra you are in vain. According to Olsufiev, the species is associated with coniferous forests. According to the same Olsufiev, it is found as far away as in the Gorky (Nizhny Novgorod) region. What would he not be in Moscow.
In the south of Flax.this beast is quite ordinary.

7. Moscow, Bitsevsky Forest Park, 29.04.2009
Tephritidae, must be understood


Tephritis bardanae Schrank

Tabanus. Can someone determine the type?
Moscow region, Ramenskiy district, Khripan, June.

A common mistake. This is not Tabanus, but Hybomitra, most likely H. lundbecki. As you can see, the eyes are covered with hairs, the crown with a shiny ocular tubercle. And most likely on the eyes of three stripes.

About the tundra you are in vain. According to Olsufiev, the species is associated with coniferous forests. According to the same Olsufiev, it is found as far away as in the Gorky (Nizhny Novgorod) region. What would he not be in Moscow.
In the south of Flax.this beast is quite ordinary.

I confirm that I have met him in our Nizhny Novgorod region (at the Department of Zoology of the UNN Biofactory Faculty, I think there is even one of the materials collected every summer by students at the biological station) and in the Vladimir region, Gorokhovets district.

http://zooex.baikal.ru/diptera/tabanidae.htm I think here and in other sources Tabanus and Hybomitra go as synonyms. BUT I might be wrong. BUT in appearance it is still similar to tarandinus

I think that in H. lundbecki the orange spots on the sides of the abdomen are more pronounced. there are no stripes like a deer horsefly. I have this view in a collection. If necessary, I can do it later for comparation

A common mistake. This is not Tabanus, but Hybomitra, most likely H. lundbecki. As you can see, the eyes are covered with hairs, the crown with a shiny ocular tubercle. And most likely on the eyes of three stripes.

I looked at the description of Tabanus tarandinus. Pubescent eyes, three stripes on them, frontal callus as in the photo.
And the photo doesn't look anything like Hybomitra lundbecki.
For me, so poured tarandinus.

I looked at the description of Tabanus tarandinus. Pubescent eyes, three stripes on them, frontal callus as in the photo.
And the photo doesn't look anything like Hybomitra lundbecki.
It looks just like tarandinus to me.

Where did you find this? Is it that gibomitra was placed in tabanus or vice versa?. In Green, there is Hybomitra tarandina, T. tarandinus is not there.
On the dipter, everyone is shouting with one voice that this is H. tarandina.
So...

Where did you find this? Is it that gibomitra was placed in tabanus or vice versa?. In Green, there is Hybomitra tarandina, T. tarandinus is not there.
On the dipter, everyone is shouting with one voice that this is H. tarandina.
So...

Fauna of the USSR insects diptera volume VII, vol.2 page 149
That's where I found it. I agree that everyone on the dipter is shouting that this is tarandina.
He immediately said that this is tarandina, and not lundbacks or something like that.

Where did you find this? Is it that gibomitra was placed in tabanus or vice versa?. In Green, there is Hybomitra tarandina, T. tarandinus is not there.
On the dipter, everyone is shouting with one voice that this is H. tarandina.
So...

Fauna Europaea you will be judged by

Initially, I also defined it this way, but then I began to doubt: The Moscow region is not a tundra

About the tundra you are in vain. According to Olsufiev, the species is associated with coniferous forests. According to the same Olsufiev, it is found as far away as in the Gorky (Nizhny Novgorod) region. What would he not be in Moscow.
In the south of Flax.this beast is quite ordinary.

I can confirm that I have met him both in our Nizhny Novgorod region (at the Department of Zoology of the UNN Biofactory Faculty, I think there is even one of the materials collected every summer by students at the biological station) and in the Vladimir region, Gorokhovets district.

I have repeatedly met Hybomitra tarandina in the Yaroslavl region, in particular, in the Uglich and Borisoglebsky districts.

  Fauna Europaea you will be judged by

The species is now in the genus Hybomitra. It used to be in the genus Tabanus. There is no guarantee that in the near future, as a result of the efforts of taxonomists, it will not be included in any genus Neohybomitrella (the name is absolutely conditional).
Nevertheless, anyone familiar with horseflies will know what kind of species they are talking about if someone says Tabanus tarandinus. For scientific work, of course, careful verification of names is necessary. But what's the point here?
In the definition of beetles, no one was afraid of Selatosomus impressus, although in the literature available to me this species has long been in the genus Mosotalesus. And on the site www.elateridae.com this species seems to be included in a completely different genus.
Or they were talking about Galerucella tenella. And now in the literature, this species is sometimes included in the genus Neogalerucella, or even in the genus Pyrrhalta. But we are well aware of what kind of game we are talking about.

The species is now in the genus Hybomitra. It used to be in the genus Tabanus. There is no guarantee that in the near future, as a result of the efforts of taxonomists, it will not be included in any genus Neohybomitrella (the name is absolutely conditional).
Nevertheless, anyone familiar with horseflies will know what kind of species they are talking about if someone says Tabanus tarandinus. For scientific work, of course, careful verification of names is necessary. But what's the point here?
In the definition of beetles, no one was afraid of Selatosomus impressus, although in the literature available to me this species has long been in the genus Mosotalesus. And on the site www.elateridae.com this species seems to be included in a completely different genus.
Or they were talking about Galerucella tenella. And now in the literature, this species is sometimes included in the genus Neogalerucella, or even in the genus Pyrrhalta. But we are well aware of what kind of game we are talking about.

Alexey, don't take it so personally . You identified the horsefly in this picture, as well as a number of other forum members, correctly, and everyone really understood what you meant. And about Hybomitra, the participants clarified, because, as it seems to me, it is also useful for the author of the picture to know the modern name of this species. Is that right?

This post was edited by Dmitrich - 17.10.2009 21: 02

Oh, I didn't think my persona would lead to such conversations

Pictures:

DSC04920.jpg — (129.58к)

I jumped from the political forum here and wrote in the appropriate mood. I don't think I've ever been so aggressive on this forum before. I apologize if I offended anyone.

I jumped from the political forum here and wrote in the appropriate mood. I don't think I've ever been so aggressive on this forum before. I apologize if I offended anyone.

Ka-ak I understand you-yu-yu, dear Alex 2611, ah! As I understand you! But, to everyone's satisfaction, "this", kag-budy-that, "subsided" and you can again turn to the actors...
Help, PLZ, with a hint... Of course, there are some considerations, but I'm not sure… To determine from the photo, I think, and others will not be sure, but there will be some considerations.... Share, PLZ
Both flies (both sam and sama) are from Novosibirsk. What is not a pair is clear by looking at R4+5, a further?

Pictures:

_98132.jpg — (81.92к)

These animals are extremely interesting. All from, presumably, Asilidae.

1. Volgograd region, Sredneakhtubinsky district, floodplain oak grove in the vicinity of Krasny Tug settlement, 13.06.2004.

2. Also known as: Volgograd region, Kumylzhensky district, bplka B. Fomina, 18.06.2006.


3. Volgograd region, Kamyshinsky district, Shcherbakovskaya balka, 23.05.2008.


4. Volgograd region, Kamyshinsky district, Shcherbakovskaya balka, 23.05.2008.


5. Volgograd region, Kamyshinsky district, Shcherbakovskaya balka, 23.05.2008.


6. Volgograd region, Olkhovsky district, Polunino village district, 13.06.2008.


This post was edited by evk - 26.10.2009 10: 57

In photo 3 - some kind of Hawk moth (Dioctria sp.) With a high probability-D. atricapilla

This post was edited by Justus - 10/26/2009 15: 20

Can I identify it?


12.06.2009. MO


12.06.2009. МО

In the first photo-Temnostoma bombylans

Can I identify it?

Second photo-Empis tessellata

Is it a hymenopteran? Who knows what it's called?

[attachmentid()=74745]

Sirphid fly (diptera) of the genus Eristalis

Eristalis tenax?

I may be a fool, but I will not define the genus Eristalis from the photo. Put a photo in the definition of diptera and you will probably get an answer.

Please tell me the name of this fly. Is it Eristalis tenax or not?

So it is... as it seems.
I can't say, " Don't doubt it," even if it's true. want.
(For "solid Yes" there are "specialists" here)
And what causes doubts - "E. T. or not"?