Photos of collections

zachot!

Giant butterfly wings, occupy gigantic box areas. My heart bleeds. I will collect small compact beetles. Joke. The butterflies didn't die for nothing. Well done.

Dear A. Y. Elez, are you sure that we are talking about the Yaroslavl region? I was born in Rostov Veliky and still live today. The local museum has no exhibition dedicated to nature for more than 30 years, and the collection of insects was absent even when something similar (in the 60s of the last century) was. As for Yaroslavl, I know the museum exhibition dedicated to insects ("Six - legged masters of the Planet") well, it is curated by our respected forum member-Elizar, and it is not built on the principle of lighting up the local fauna. Exotic butterflies are displayed there, but no one can include them in the collection of local fauna either by mistake or for any other reason, since it is not displayed. Maybe you got something mixed up?

Maybe, but in this case I won't be able to clarify it now. Old age is not a joy. I saw it about ten years ago. In general, there was almost only one box with butterflies, very unkempt. Perhaps not even within the framework of a natural exhibition (although something else seemed to be natural), but as an isolated example of long-standing private collections of someone from the local community. Other than these two cities, others are almost excluded. A mistake is always possible, but the chance in this case is very small. Most likely, just this box is not long after that endured kozheed. But, since you have raised doubts, in my next visits to the Vologda region, I will check their museums (I didn't confuse them with them; although it is very unlikely, since I visit there often, and I saw that box only once, and by the way, there were no exotics in it, except for one hawk moth, all local banalities). And there's no one else to think about...

Giant butterfly wings, occupy gigantic box areas. My heart bleeds. I will collect small compact beetles. Joke. The butterflies didn't die for nothing. Well done.

I agree, of course, if such sailboats are filled with boxes, then not only the space in them, but also the apartment will not be enough.But I'll hold off on the beetles for now.

To the author of the collection-alexanora, what subspecies do you have and where do you come from?

I've had it too. And then there are new points, new subspecies and there is already an increase in volume. For example, I love the genus Oeneis very much and at first I had 2 tarpeas from the Altai Territory and I was happy with them. And now magna and jutta in a healthy box and not just for the sake of quantity, but because jutta is Finnish, Leningrad, Belarusian and went to Sakhalin. That's how it works with volumes. It makes no sense to fill a box with a series from one point, but when there are large exchanges, I try to get what I need for the groups of interest. For example, Phoebe I have 3 boxes, swallowtail 2. And Cossus cossus - 4. Where to go!
And Jagik has a wonderful quality. Great.

The first is a box from the collection
, the second is our study at Witt's in Munich

Pictures:

Image1ajpg.jpg — (412.03к)


rabota.JPG — (341.41к)

I don't do a lot of tropical butterflies, but there's a box of Borneo.
Mostly scoops and crested birds (and a few cocoonworms in the lower right corner for extras))

I don't do a lot of tropical butterflies, but there's a box of Borneo.
Mostly scoops and crested birds (and a few cocoonworms in the lower right corner for extras))

I liked most of all the white moth with eyespots and another bear that was under a large butterfly from the left below. ..And so a cool collection is better than two huge butterflies for the whole box

dipper-like a scoop )

Now the Frost will come and drool Very beautiful butterflies!

That's right, RippeR noticed. really a scoop. Baorsia hieroglyphica

Borneo, this is normal
The material is still distributed normally Although there
are new species still in mass

dipper-like a scoop )

Now the Frost will come and drool Very beautiful butterflies!

Nice little box. But I have no hypersalivation. The only thing is that it would be interesting to take a closer look at the dark green and greenish tufts from the upper right part. It is difficult to understand what is Netria (multispinae or viridescens) and what is Syntypistis. And so - all this is quite understandable.
B. hieroglyphica-I agree, insanely cute babka

Morozzz. The crested one?

A bit of hawk moth

Top in the middle row-who?Similar to oleander, but the color is interesting

Top in the middle row-who?It looks like oleander, but the color scheme is interesting

If memory serves, then this is D. hypothous.
And the lower ones in the same row are A. naga? Where do these instances come from?

This post was edited by Jarik - 03/14/2009 14: 48

Indeed D. hypothous
Naga from Borneo

A death's head is a different species! : confused:
How many species are there in the world?Can you collect a collection of dead heads?

A death's head is a different species!
And how many species are there in the world?Can you collect a collection of dead heads?

Very few of them. I know 3 types and probably no more

Acherontia atropos (Linnaeus, 1758)
Acherontia lachesis (Fabricius, 1798)
Acherontia styx (Westwood, 1847)

I have lachesis. In the middle lane, there is atropos (the one that is the usual death's head).
If you collect and subspecies think on 30x40 box typed. Although of course it all depends on the number of butterflies in the series..

There are 4 species in the Palearctic.

There are 4 species in the Palearctic.

And what is 4?

I made a little mistake, the 4th one is a subspecies of styx...

According to the d'Abrera catalog, there are also 3 types.

to DavBaz:
Yeah, she is. Netria multispinae multispinae Schintlmeister, 2006
I also noticed Syntypistis palladina and Somera viridifusca

And your hawkmoth Acosmeryx is not naga at all

They are more similar to Acosmeryx pseudonaga Brechlin & Kitching, 2007

By the way, I caught A. naga in Primorye in 2006. This is the third or 4th find in the Russian Federation. These data were included in the article by E. Belyaev about the discovery of this species in the Russian Federation. I gave a copy to Streltsov.

By the way, I caught A. naga in Primorye in 2006. This is the third or 4th find in the Russian Federation. These data were included in the article by E. Belyaev about the discovery of this species in the Russian Federation. I gave a copy to Streltsov.

Actually, here is the article (there at the end).

I marvel at you, Hippo Cat
With sincere respect!
I have a bunch of PDFs of my articles. I would post them for forum users.
Can this be done through you? I'm not an expert on working in Intet

I marvel at you, Hippo Cat
With sincere respect!
I have a bunch of PDFs of my articles. I would post them for forum users.
Can this be done through you? I'm not an expert on working in the Internet

Of course, I can just put them en masse to my hosting-but it will be somehow unpresentable, as if from under the floor.
I already said here on the forum, what format would be, in my opinion, the most correct: to make up links to the list of works on the Witt website. Articles would also be posted there (but even if not - you can use a third-party hosting service, even if it's mine). Who is the webmaster there-how do I get in touch? I would put down all the links in half an hour, this is not a problem at all!
And what is the volume of megabytes of articles all together? And then if there is a lot - I may not have enough space

nihoho! Cut out my eyes

Satyridae

Eeeh! If there's such a binge going on, then there's a little bit of mine!


1. Barbels and zlatki.


2. Lamellar sawyere companions.


3. All sorts of different things.


4. Leaf beetles, dolbonosiki and chernotelki.


5. Karabuses (Caucasus, Siberia, Far East, etc.)


6. Karabusy (Ukraine)


7. Karabusy (Ukraine)


8. Any undisclosed Asian.

Well, grannies.


9. Satirids and belyanki.


10. Nymphalids.


11. Golubyanki, tolstogolovki, sailboats and all sorts of motley things.


12. Scoops.


13. Hawkmoths

A small selection of the genus gonepteryx

They're good!!!I would also like to come here for the full beauty of gonepteryx cleopatra!!!

They're good!!!I would also like to come here for the full beauty of gonepteryx cleopatra!!!

Yes. Cleopatra unfortunately is not. I think to exchange or buy from someone..

So ask Pasha for the Cleopatra spec.

Moreover, this is not uncommon in the Western European "yugas". Recently, for example, Osipov had males: Gonepteryx cleopatra europaea E Spain (Pyrenees) m|4.00 USD.

This post was edited by Aaata - 17.06.2009 08: 23

So ask Pasha for a Cleopatra specialist.

I am always open to cooperation