E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Cocoonworms-Lasiocampidae

Community and ForumInsects imagesCocoonworms-Lasiocampidae

Pages: 1 ...7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

07.03.2013 22:20, AGG

thank you very much!
more questions shuffle.gifof the plant are given from those observed in nature or what was fed at home? and then we are looking in our own area, but all without success frown.gifhere we are collecting information for the upcoming spring.
-can I get a photo (or a short description) of the biotope?
PS can be on the soap, but I think that a couple of good photos of stations will not harm the topic, but only add to it smile.gif

07.03.2013 22:46, barko

Zimbabwe. Help me determine it.
Cymatopacha obscura Aurivillius, 1921
Likes: 1

07.03.2013 23:24, Victor Gazanchidis

For AGG
, Here are the lanestris biotopes in the Moscow region. 25.04.2009

This post was edited by vicgrr-07.03.2013 23: 25

Pictures:
picture: IMGP0147.JPG
IMGP0147.JPG — (216.9к)

picture: IMGP0138.JPG
IMGP0138.JPG — (179.73к)

Likes: 3

08.03.2013 9:13, Andrey Ponomarev

thank you very much!
more questions shuffle.gifof the plant are given from those observed in nature or what was fed at home? and then we are looking in our own area, but all without success frown.gifhere we are collecting information for the upcoming spring.
-can I get a photo (or a short description) of the biotope?
PS can be used on soap, but I think that a couple of good photos of stations will not harm the topic, but only add to it smile.gif

All photos were taken in nature,on the plants on which the caterpillars were located.
I think it's easier to find young caterpillars like in the second photo.
Biotopes
of 1. M. O., pos.Poplar
picture: IMG_5235.jpg
picture: IMG_5295.jpg
2. Voinova Gora, 15 km from Topolinoe.I met the last Lanestris there on 06.05.2012. smile.gif
picture: IMG_4141.jpg
picture: IMG_9359.jpg
Likes: 4

08.03.2013 15:40, dim-va

[vicgrr, 07.03.2013 20: 17]There are several undefined cokers in the collection. Madagascar]

3716 Phoenicladocera turtur de Lajonquiere или xanthogramma de Lajonquiere
3717 Callopizoma malgassica Kenrick
Likes: 1

12.03.2013 18:29, Sergey Rybalkin

Dear forumchane, tell me, please, how do the Siberian cocoonworm reliably differ from the pine cocoonworm? Here in the Urals, both species are found.

12.03.2013 20:33, Sergey Rybalkin

Please help me identify the cocoonworms:

111-Yu.Ural, Chelyabinsk region, Snezhinsk 05.05.1991-is it Phyllodesma japonica or Phyllodesma ilicifolia ???

222-Dagestan, Makhachkala region, 10.07.2010 - is it P. tremulifolia or P. joannisi ???

333-Primorsky Krai, Khasansky district, Zanadvorovka village, 13-18. 07. 2004-is this G. populifolia, or G. clathrata???

Thanks!

Pictures:
picture: 111.JPG
111.JPG — (175.23к)

picture: 222.JPG
222.JPG — (142.79 k)

picture: 333.JPG
333.JPG — (130.09к)

12.03.2013 23:04, AntSkr

1. japonicum
2. joannisi
3. clathrata
Likes: 1

13.03.2013 7:17, Vlad Proklov

Dear forumchane, tell me, please, how do the Siberian cocoonworm reliably differ from the pine cocoonworm? Here in the Urals, both species are found.
There are three species in the Urals : pini, sibiricus, and kilmez. I don't know how to distinguish them.

This post was edited by kotbegemot - 13.03.2013 07: 17
Likes: 1

13.03.2013 20:36, dim-va

These types are hard to confuse. Both in size, and in the clarity of the picture, and in general proportions. I'll give you pictures one of these days, but I don't have time now. The real difference, in case of doubt, is the valvas. They can be easily viewed for fresh copies and with some skill - and for collectible ones. In valvae, the ratio of the upper and lower blades is important. The kilmese "species" is either a highly evasive pini, or, more likely, only a hybrid form between the two species - this partly explains the fact that according to different markers, butterflies of this form are placed either in the pini clade or in the sibiricus clade.
Likes: 2

13.03.2013 20:57, Vlad Proklov

These types are hard to confuse. Both in size, and in the clarity of the picture, and in general proportions. I'll give you pictures one of these days, but I don't have time now. The real difference, in case of doubt, is the valvas. They can be easily viewed for fresh copies and with some skill - and for collectible ones. In valvae, the ratio of the upper and lower blades is important. The kilmese "species" is either a highly evasive pini, or, more likely, only a hybrid form between the two species - this partly explains the fact that according to different markers, butterflies of this form are placed either in the pini clade or in the sibiricus clade.

And, by the way, can I have an article where kilmez is described?

13.03.2013 22:18, dim-va

Here is the promised picture. The top row is sibiricus, the bottom row is pini. The color may vary slightly, but the pattern and its clarity are fairly constant. I apologize, I didn't clean up this picture, but the proportions of both species and both sexes are preserved.

Pictures:
picture: Dendrol.jpg
Dendrol.jpg — (193.58к)

Likes: 13

13.03.2013 22:31, dim-va

And here is a picture from Rozhkov. Pay attention to Figure 1, where the lengths of the upper and lower branches are diagnostic.
I'll look at the article. I need to digitize it first. But the drawings in it are not enough-something-saying.

Pictures:
picture: GU.jpg
GU.jpg — (149.79к)

Likes: 6

14.03.2013 18:43, Sergey Rybalkin

These types are hard to confuse. Both in size, and in the clarity of the picture, and in general proportions. I'll give you pictures one of these days, but I don't have time now. The real difference, in case of doubt, is the valvas. They can be easily viewed for fresh copies and with some skill - and for collectible ones. In valvae, the ratio of the upper and lower blades is important. The kilmese "species" is either a highly evasive pini, or, more likely, only a hybrid form between the two species - this partly explains the fact that according to different markers, butterflies of this form are placed either in the pini clade or in the sibiricus clade.


Thank you, I assumed such criteria for determining, but just in case, I will post photos of my collection cocoonworms so that you can see with your own eye who is where...

14.03.2013 19:01, Sergey Rybalkin

Here is a photo of Ural cocoonworms.

I will assume that all gray-sibiricus, para-pini, yellow female-also a form of pini.

Pictures:
picture: DSC03502.jpg
DSC03502.jpg — (190.8к)

picture: DSC03503.jpg
DSC03503.jpg — (212.49к)

picture: DSC03504.jpg
DSC03504.jpg — (219.95к)

picture: DSC03505.jpg
DSC03505.jpg — (205.64к)

picture: DSC03506.jpg
DSC03506.jpg — (166.13к)

Likes: 8

14.03.2013 19:14, Sergey Rybalkin

And here, seaside cocoonworms, this, I take it, is all sibiricus?

Pictures:
picture: DSC03507.jpg
DSC03507.jpg — (204.16к)

picture: DSC03509.jpg
DSC03509.jpg — (218.22к)

Likes: 8

15.03.2013 21:28, Victor Gashtarov

Pachypasa otus (Drury, 1773) - very rare dinosaur in our Lepidopterological fauna. This male comes from SW Bulgaria, Belasitza Mts. 610 m.

Pictures:
picture: P._otus.JPG
P._otus.JPG — (155.62к)

Likes: 20

07.04.2013 10:19, Andrey Ponomarev

Dear forumchane and experts of cocoonworms, clarification is required.
On May 8, 2012, hippopotamus and I caught a female Phyllodesma, and we thought it was tremulifolia.Photo of a live butterfly I threw on Lepiforum de..
The other day I get an answer from Jeroen Voogd that this is most likely Phyllodesma ilicifolia.
I reply with a photo of a straightened female courtesy of Vlad, on which Jeroenen pointed out the signs of ilicifolia, but writes that he is not 100% sure.
So is it tremulifolia or ilicifolia?
picture: Phyllodesma_tremulifolia_______.jpg
picture: 97554_2.jpg
picture: 97554_1.jpg
Likes: 6

07.04.2013 13:59, dim-va

This is tremulifolia, your original definition is correct. There is nothing in this female that would lead to its definition as ilicifolia. The only thing that is not very typical is the slightly more blurred dark pattern of the front wing. The table scan shows a red southern population with a reduced pattern, resembling ssp. danieli Laj. The photo of a live butterfly is a typical European form of tremulifolia.
Likes: 2

07.04.2013 15:33, Vlad Proklov

Causes antires

Vadim, what do you think about this one (Moscow region, O-Zuevsky district, Neftyanik)?

picture: phyllodesma_ilicifolia_01a.jpg

07.04.2013 16:01, barko

Can you show me photographs of the genitals of a male and female ilicifolium?
Good. Just a little later. Maybe after the weekend.
Let me remind you of my long standing request to display photos of ilicifolium genitalia shuffle.gif

07.04.2013 16:05, Konung

07.04.2013 16:09, Vlad Proklov

what's wrong with tremulifolia?

Well, look, Slav: this one was caught in the same place, at the same time - but slightly different: lighter, yellower...

The problem is complicated by the fact that I have never seen a stop-time specific ilicifolia frown.gif

picture: phyllodesma_tremulifolia_01a.jpg

07.04.2013 16:29, dim-va

so it is... both tremulifolium
I posted here ilicifolium in comparison with this species.
With the genitals, I'm sorry, I never made a flat drug, but, I'll make a reservation right away, these two types of genitals do not differ. Not by the shape of the valvae, not by the weapons of the Aedeagus. So you can not cook.
Likes: 2

07.04.2013 16:38, barko

so it is... both tremulifolium
I posted here ilicifolium in comparison with this species.
With the genitals, I'm sorry, I never made a flat drug, but, I'll make a reservation right away, these two types of genitals do not differ. Not by the shape of the valvae, not by the weapons of the Aedeagus. So you can not cook.
For me, such statements are like a red rag for a bull smile.giffor nothing, that I don't do cocoonworms. And yet I really ask for a photo of the genitals of the real ilicifolium.

07.04.2013 17:07, Konung

For me, such statements are like a red rag for a bull smile.giffor nothing, that I don't do cocoonworms. Still, I'm really asking for a photo of the genitals of a real ilicifolium.

Well, these species at least in appearance differ well in biotopes - ilicifolia is a mesohygrophil, we fly exclusively in the taiga zone, and tremulifolia is quite a xerophile, it is full in the steppe and forest-steppe, but not in the taiga. In addition, tremulifolia is always small compared to ilicifolia.
Vlad, take a look at my website ilicifolia.
Likes: 1

07.04.2013 17:08, Konung

For me, such statements are like a red rag for a bull smile.giffor nothing, that I don't do cocoonworms.

If only the harpies had such a reactionsmile.gif, I'm talking about Cerura and Furcula ))

07.04.2013 17:12, Vlad Proklov


Vlad, take a look at my ilicifolia website.

Slav, and the second "ilicifolia" is not tremulifolia?

This post was edited by kotbegemot-07.04.2013 17: 12

07.04.2013 17:17, Vlad Proklov

And more.

Here are these photos from the Ramenskoye district of the Moscow Region (Vitaly Gumenyuk from Khripani and Tolya Krupitsky from Donino) - identified by the authors (?) like ilicifolia.

Now I have doubts about the validity of these definitions.

Who will say what? Vadim?

picture: phyllodesma_ilicifolia_ph01.jpg

picture: phyllodesma_ilicifolia_ph02.jpg

07.04.2013 17:20, Konung

Slav, and the second "ilicifolia" is not tremulifolia?

nea smile.gif

07.04.2013 17:27, Vlad Proklov

nope smile.gif

Are you sure? And then the tremulik is not only steppe, in the forests, too, there is...

07.04.2013 17:31, Konung

Are you sure? And then the tremulik is not only steppe, in the forests, too, there is...

I'm sure I'm sure ))

07.04.2013 17:35, Vlad Proklov

I'm sure I'm sure ))

Justify it! tongue.gif

Or did you output it?

07.04.2013 17:42, Konung

yes, here they are, look for yourself smile.gifthey are different
picture: IMG_2479_2.jpg
Likes: 1

07.04.2013 17:51, Vlad Proklov

yes, here they are, look for yourself smile.gifthey are different

Not, which is set here - there are no complaints about it. But on the site you still have a second image, a completely red one. We're talking about him.

By the way, it is noteworthy that the Japanese do not differ much in size from the rest. Moscow region japonicum is noticeably larger than its counterparts. But it is easy to distinguish it along a straight submarginal line on the front wing in any case.

07.04.2013 18:00, Sungaya

And more.

Here are these photos from the Ramenskoye district of the Moscow Region (Vitaly Gumenyuk from Khripani ...

picture: phyllodesma_ilicifolia_ph01.jpg


And when did it become an ilicifolia? smile.gif
It seems to have always been tremulifolia smile.gif

07.04.2013 18:01, Vlad Proklov

And when did it become an ilicifolia? smile.gif
I think I've always been a tremulifolia smile.gif

I don't even remember...

07.04.2013 18:10, Konung

Not, which is set here - there are no complaints about it. But on the site you still have a second image, a completely red one. We're talking about him.

And the second one is not from my collection, but believe me, it is also an ilicifolia. take a look at the lightening along the submarginal band on the front fender. tremulifolia doesn't have it.

07.04.2013 18:14, Sungaya

And are there any reliable finds of ilicifolia from the Moscow Region known at all (except for Sirotkin's list)?

07.04.2013 18:25, Vlad Proklov

And the second one is not from my collection, but believe me, it is also an ilicifolia. take a look at the lightening along the submarginal band on the front fender. tremulifolia doesn't have it.

The thing is, it can happen (look at mine, for example) - maybe in the forest and steppe zones you just have different ecological forms.

Pages: 1 ...7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.