Moscow and the Moscow region

Are you afraid that the post will be deleted?
Not worth it. I think many times before I post.

Are you afraid that the post will be deleted?
Not worth it. I think many times before I post.

What am I supposed to be afraid of? I don't want to raise children with you, as they say. It's just that your style of communication is somehow not very consistent with what is accepted in the cultural society in general and in the scientific community in particular. And this fact, in particular, does not add significance to your near-scientific (except for my personal evaluation opinion) works.

Head of the academic department: Sidorov, why do you regularly skip morning lectures on isthmus? You probably walk your dog in the morning?
Sidorov: Professor, I've never had a dog and I don't have one.
Head of the academic department: This is not an excuse.

This is a bearded guy from the 80s. This is about excessive excuses[color=red][color=gray]

2 macroglossum

Does it look like I'm making excuses?

2 aleko

according to your faith, let it be done to you. I'm tired of arguing - my mother says about people like you "at least a stake on the head of teshi" .

[quote=rhopalocera.com,08.06.2012 10:32]

12.06.2012 Andreevskoe village, Odintsovo district, Moscow region

I went to the lake district. Except for Lycaena helle and Boloria eunomia, both species were present. Otherwise, a fairly standard set.

Total:

Hesperiidae:
Ochlodes sylvanus
Pyrgus malvae

Lycaenidae:
Lycaena helle
Celastrina argiolus

Nymphalidae:
Limenitis populi
Euphydryas aurinia
Melitaea athalia
Boloria eunomia
Boloria selene

Papilionidae:
Papilio machaon

Pieridae:
Gonepteryx rhamni
Anthocharis cardamines
Aporia crataegi
Pieris napi
Pieris rapae

Sphingidae:
Hemaris fuciformis

Geometridae:
Cabera pusaria
Ematurga atomaria
Pseudopanthera macularia
Siona lineata
Scopula immorata

Erebidae:
Diacrisia sannio
Euclidia glyphica
Euclidia mi

Noctuidae:
Autographa gamma

Report on catching micra in Pestovo, Odintsovo district of Moscow region, last weekend. In fact, compared to the moles, the rest of the interesting things were few and far between. According to the diaries, with the exception of two swamp rarities, swallowtail and dawn, I will support Fyodor-a) However, I also came across Lycaena hippothoe, which I previously only met in the Orekhovo-Zuyevsky district. There are not very many hawthorns, compared to the rest of the region, but at night the fact of reproduction of another white pest, Leucoma salicis, was clearly visible. In terms of the total number of butterflies, there were quite a lot of them on the night from 9 to 10, from 10 to 11 it was average, from 11 to 12 it would be the most if they flew all night, and not just 2 hours after a thunderstorm) At night, almost all the butterflies were banal, but there were more or less rare species-Sabra harpagula and Drymonia dodonaea, also once I met odorous and aspen woodworms, it seems too early for them. Several relatively frequent species turned out to be new to me, because I caught very little in Pestovo in June - Eupithecia subfuscata, Hadena confusa and Hecatera bicolorata (the latter was first caught a week ago); Charanyca trigrammica was a more interesting find. But mikra was pleased: there are several new or just rare species for me: the fourth find on the ETR Cosmopterix sibirica (made 5 meters from the third), Schiffermuelleria schaefferella (came across 3 years ago... dead on a window), Nematopogon? robertellus, Ancylis diminutana, Pseudotelphusa scalella, Eucosmomorpha albersana, and Scythris obscurella. It also seems that the weather in early June was favorable for fungi: many tinder trees of the genus Laetiropus grew on the oaks, where various invertebrates settled, including Lordithon lunulatus, which was caught in the frame. When leaving the dacha, I got in the area of the Zhavoronki platform under a powerful downpour with visibility less than 100 m. and hail up to 1 cm in diameter)


Hecatera bicolorata and Hadena confusa

Sabra harpagula

Schiffermuelleria schaefferella

Cosmopterix sibirica

Nematopogon sp. and Aethes margaritana

Pseudotelphusa scalella и Eucosmomorpha albersana

Charanyca trigrammica

Lycaena hippothoe

Moma alpium

Scythris obscurella


This post was edited by Ilya U-13.06.2012 17: 23

Summary report on visiting the village of Torbeevo (Moscow region) on 10 and 16.06.2012.

10.06.2012г. Participants: me, Alexey Vishnyakov and Vasily Feoktistov. The weather was very disappointing. Already on arrival at Zheleznodorozhny, where Alexey and I were supposed to meet Vasily, the sky was overcast. When we arrived directly at the fishing site, rain began to fall, which turned into a downpour. We were pretty wet, but we were able to pick up a few things:

Cerabycidae:
Acanthocinus griseus (females)
Saperda populnea

Buprestidae:
Melanophila acuminata
and Agrilus sp.

There are no photos, because the weather did not encourage photographing. But the most annoying thing was that when we arrived in Moscow, the weather settled down and the sun came out. Rudeness!!!

16.06.2012 Participants: me, Alexey Vishnyakov and Andrey A. The weather was much better. There was no rain, and sometimes the sun came out. The result is much better: a bunch of Monogamuses, Acanthocinus both species. I was particularly pleased with the discovery of Saperda carcharis.













A drop of summer:


On the way back, a swift was found on the road. So that the unfortunate bird did not get under the wheels of auto, moto, and quad transport, it was decided to move it to a safe place.

Strizh had to be helped to take off - to give him a lift, otherwise he wouldn't be able to do it from the ground. Apparently, I ran into something...

Strizh had to be helped to take off - to give him a lift, otherwise he wouldn't be able to do it from the ground. Apparently, I ran into something...

I did so, but the swift flew a little and swooped down somewhere in the bushes. Apparently, podranok was. Sorry ptahu

On time, today I'm just going there to fish for gold .
I'll add it Torbeevo this is a village, not a village. Important when writing labels.

This post was edited by vasiliy-feoktistov - 18.06.2012 07: 23

In addition to the Black Coleoptera report on a trip to the surrounding area. Torbeevo.
In addition to 16.06 I was there on 9.06.2012

Сerambycidae:
Rhagium mordax
Rhagium inquisitor
Pachyta quadrimaculata
Carilia virginea
Dinoptera collaris
Leptura quadrifasciata
Leptura aethiops
Lepturalia nigripes
Stenurella melanura
Judolia sexmaculata
Alosterna tabacicolor
Paracorymbia maculicornis
Anastrangalia reyi
Spondylis buprestoides
Molorchus minor
Ropalopus ?macropus
Callidium violaceum
Phymatodes alni
Phymatodes testaceus
Plagionotus detritus
Plagionotus arcuatus
Xylotrechus rusticus
Mesosa myops
Monochamus urussovi
Monochamus galloprovincialis
Monochamus sutor
Pogonocherus fasciculatus
Acanthoderes clavipes
Acanthocinus aedilis
Acanthocinus griseus
Leiopus nebulosus
Anaesthetis testacea
Tetrops praeusta
Saperda scalaris
Saperda carcharias
Oberea oculata
Phytoecia nigricornis
Agapanthia villosoviridescens

In addition to the Black Coleoptera report on a trip to the surrounding area. Torbeevo.
In addition to 16.06 I was there on 9.06.2012

Сerambycidae:
Phymatodes alni
Phymatodes testaceus
Plagionotus detritus
Pogonocherus fasciculatus
Leiopus nebulosus
Anaesthetis testacea

I would like to learn more about these six types. I just know this forest and clearing very well from childhood: I constantly collect there (my favorite land near the house), but I have never found these barbels

This post was edited by vasiliy-feoktistov - 18.06.2012 09: 18

  
I'll add it Torbeevo this is a village, not a village.

In how... For some reason, I've always considered them practically synonymous (village/village). Although now I specifically looked - "village": it seems to be larger and with a church (judging by Wikipedia), but there are no clear formal differences, in general, I didn't understand anything... Or it is the local people themselves who decide what it will be called. For example, I don't remember that in our neighborhood "villages" officially appeared somewhere, this is probably only accepted in Russia...

I would like to learn more about these six types. I just know this forest and clearing very well from childhood: I constantly collect there (my favorite land near the house), but I have never found these barbels

And the easiest way to catch them with a net is to mow them down

In how... For some reason, I've always considered them practically synonymous (village/village). Although now I specifically looked - "village": it seems to be larger and with a church (judging by Wikipedia), but there are no clear formal differences, in general, I didn't understand anything... Or it is the local people themselves who decide what it will be called. For example, I don't remember that in our neighborhood "villages" officially appeared somewhere, this is probably only accepted in Russia...

http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Town_setment_Kraskovo

Pictures:

pic_2.jpg — (111.81к)

I would like to learn more about these six types.

Almost all of these beetles are collected singly on the trunks of cut down oaks (if you go from art. Gullies, then to the left along the clearing a lot of oaks)
Phymatodes alni-2 pieces on sawn oak (9.06)
Phymatodes testaceus-2 pieces on an oak tree (on a fallen trunk from below) (16.06)
Plagionotus detritus - 3 pieces on a sawn oak tree (9.06)
Pogonocherus fasciculatus-1 piece on thin branches of fallen pine (16.06)
Leiopus nebulosus-1 piece by mowing on growing bushes (9.06)
Anaesthetis testacea-1pc on sawn oak (16.06)

Almost all of these beetles are collected singly on the trunks of cut down oaks (if you go from art. Gullies, then to the left along the clearing a lot of oaks)
Phymatodes alni-2 pieces on sawn oak (9.06)
Phymatodes testaceus-2 pieces on an oak tree (on a fallen trunk from below) (16.06)
Plagionotus detritus - 3 pieces on a sawn oak tree (9.06)
Pogonocherus fasciculatus-1 piece on thin branches of fallen pine (16.06)
Leiopus nebulosus-1 piece by mowing on growing bushes (9.06)
Anaesthetis testacea-1 pc on sawn oak (16.06)

Thank you: I just go in the other direction all the time (from the ravines to the right), and there are not many oaks there.
Today I was climbing there and again found someone new for myself. The report will be available later: I'm tired now.

Well, I will report on my today's joyous trip to the above-mentioned power line clearing near the village of Torbeevo, Lyuberetsky district of Moscow region.
The result was very pleased with a single find of gold leaf Chalcophora mariana: all my life I dreamed of finding it near the house..... And now a miracle happened
Also, for the first time in its life, Palaeocallidium coriaceum (Paykull, 1800) was collected on a spruce log in the amount of one specimen. Pleases very much.
Collected a single Aegomorphus sp. and I get lost: obscurior (Pic, 1904) is this or the usual clavipes Please help.
Types found:
Cerambycidae (except Rhagiini and Lepturini: Andrey.A. indicated the most likely species from these tribes in his report):
Acanthocinus griseus Fabricius, 1792, did not collect much.
Acanthocinus aedilis (Linnaeus, 1758) was not collected much.
Monochamus galloprovincialis (Ol., 1795) a lot, not collected.
Monochamus sutor (Linnaeus, 1758) was not collected much.
Monochamus urussovi (Fisch., 1806) found only a couple.
Plagionotus arcuatus (Linnaeus, 1758) collected 5 specimens.
!Palaeocallidium coriaceum (Paykull, 1800)! only once.
Aegomorphus sp.: please specify.
Ropalopus (s.str.) macropus (Germar, 1824) failed with this: collected one specimen. and dropped it past the stain
Xylotrechus rusticus (Linnaeus, 1758) was not collected in wild quantities as usual.

Buprestidae except Agrilus sp. (I didn't collect a lot of them, though).
Chalcophora mariana (Linnaeus, 1758) is rare, but the discovery proves its presence very close to Moscow.
Chrysobothris chrysostigma (Linnaeus, 1758) много.
Chrysobothris affinis (Fabricius, 1794) is plentiful.
Melanophila acuminata (Degeer, 1774) is plentiful.
Phaenops cyanea (Fabricius, 1775) is plentiful.
Well, in general, in short, and all perhaps.
Some photos:

This post was edited by vasiliy-feoktistov - 18.06.2012 19: 37

Pictures:

1.jpg — (274.49к)


2.jpg — (305.16 k)


3.jpg — (230.59к)


4.jpg — (282.05к)


5.jpg — (230.54 k)


6.jpg — (197.46 k)


7.jpg — (197.95 k)


cerambycidae.jpg — (134.64к)


buprestidae.jpg — (91.47к)


chalcophora_mariana.jpg — (85.09к)


palaecallidium_coriaceum.jpg — (74.2к)


aegomorphus_sp..jpg — (70.91к)

Good evening, dear forumchane!
Due to the fact that I can't go to the north in any way, I arranged yesterday (17.06) a small trip through the marshes near Moscow. Since this year the age of many species is ahead of schedule by a week, or even two, I assumed that there is a probability of departure of B. Aquilonaris, which is interesting for me, and the individuals I have are dated June 27-30. To do this, I went to the area of the village of Tsarevo, Pushkinsky district, I had to go alone, as I was going late in the evening, I did not look for fellow travelers. On the advice of a friend, I explored a swampy lake.
Before that, however, I had to get pretty lost, along the way I fished L. Achine, C. Selene, was surprised by a significant number of fresh large nymphs, I never saw admirals at this time. On the umbrella sea of bronzes, various barbels. The long drive to the lake was time-consuming. When I found the lake, I was somewhat disappointed. The same Selenes were flying around. On the cranberry marshes around the lake, I saw pigeons I didn't recognize a couple of times, and I scared off one bedstraw hawk moth. There is a lot of water in the forest and around the lake, apparently the rains played their part. Since there are from one to twenty meters of surface floats on the shores of the lake (I don't know how to use quicksand correctly), I decided to check whether they can withstand me. The first couple of steps - a positive result, holds. Then the water went over the floats, but the base is strong, nothing falls through. Of course, when I went there, I didn't think to take my boots, I got wet right away.
On the edges of the float, right near the water, mother-of-pearl flies, but they do not come close to the hard shore. I got closer, caught, again selenas, but fresh females, was disappointed and went further, on the northern bank of the float was 20-25 meters, I decided to fish there, well, the first Aquilonaris caught the third, good, apparently I did not lose out with the timing. To celebrate, he wrapped his pants up to his knees and began to search the territory, walking around the swaying plow. Selenae and peatlands flew together, a little later I began to distinguish them by brightness and flight. I fished well, was satisfied, now I will know for sure, since it is present in the name of the species Aquilo-we need to take swampers. Well, otherwise, the joy blocked the feeling of wet shoes, and for the first time I broke out this year, so to speak, I opened the season, I broke out of everyday work.
There are very few photos, I was alone, and there was very little time, I returned home for more than three hours, I did not take into account that on Sunday evening, Yaroslavka is worth it.
That's how I went.

Pictures:

1.JPG — (6.36 mb)


2.JPG — (4.06 mb)


3.JPG — (1.2 mb)


4.JPG — (5.72 mb)

Collected a single Aegomorphus sp. and I get lost: obscurior (Pic, 1904) is this or the usual clavipes Please help.

http://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera/rus/aegwojdk.htm

On June 8, I installed a crown trap in the PTZ with the following composition: bananas+apples crushed in a blender like baby food and a teaspoon of oak juice for a day of fermentation. On June 12, I dismantled the trap, there are about twenty bronzes of aurata+metallica+lugubris+1fieberi. Trap at a height of about a meter in the hanging crown of an old oak tree.

Luzhki village, Serpukhov district, Moscow region, 17.06.2012

The timing of butterfly summers is noticeably ahead of the standard ones. Fresh Nymphalis xanthomelas and Aglais urticae flew, mother-of-pearl Brenthisino, Argynnis adippe, Argynnis aglaja flew out. A fresh male Pieris rapae was caught, and along with the first-generation butterflies, fresh Pieris napi flew. Melanargia russiae was not a single specimen.

Total:

Hesperiidae:
Ochlodes sylvanus
Thymelicus sylvestris
Muschampia tessellum

Lycaenidae:
Lycaena alciphron
Lycaena dispar
Lycaena phlaeas
Lycaena virgaureae
Aricia eumedon
Cupido minimus
Cyaniris semiargus
Phengaris teleius
Plebejus argyrognomon
Polyommatus amandus
Polyommatus icarus
Satyrium ilicis
Satyrium pruni
Satyrium w-album

Nymphalidae:
Apatura ilia
Argynnis adippe
Argynnis aglaja
Boloria selene
Brenthis ino
Issoria lathonia
Limenitis camilla
Melitaea athalia
Melitaea cinxia
Melitaea didyma
Aglais urticae
Nymphalis xanthomelas
Vanessa atalanta
Vanessa cardui
Coenonympha arcania
Coenonympha glycerion
Coenonympha pamphilus
Lasiommata maera
Maniola jurtina
Melanargia russiae

Pieridae:
Colias hyale
Aporia crataegi
Pieris napi
Pieris rapae
Pontia edusa

Sphingidae:
Hemaris fuciformis
Hyles gallii
Smerinthus ocellata

Geometridae:
Cabera pusaria
Angerona prunaria
Lomographa bimaculata
Odezia atrata

Erebidae:
Euclidia glyphica

Noctuidae:
Heliothis ononis

Pictures:

SDC12654.JPG — (2.27мб)


SDC12656.JPG — (2.64мб)


SDC12660.JPG — (2.46мб)


SDC12664.JPG — (2.16мб)


SDC12669.JPG — (2.14мб)

Brenthisdaphne near the city of Zheleznodorozhny. An interesting find. Thanks to Vasya Feoktistov for the trip

Brenthisdaphne near the city of Zheleznodorozhny. An interesting find. Thanks to Vasya Feoktistov for the trip

Volodya, it's not a bad thing that we went there late (in the evening, but we should have done it thoroughly in the morning). I will add a little more detail to the report about our yesterday's joint trip to the village of Torbeevo, Lyubertsy district, consisting of:
Vladimir Smirnov, A. Y. Elez, your humble servant.

In addition to the aforementioned Brenthisdaphne (Bergstrasser, 1780) of butterflies have also been observed.
Nymphalidae:
Apatura ilia ([Schiffermuller], 1775)
Nymphalis xanthomelas (Esper, 1781)
Nymphalis urticae (Linnaeus, 1758)
Aphantopus hyperantus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Lycaenidae:
Lycaena dispar (Haworth, 1802)
Pieridae:
Aporia crataegi (Linnaeus, 1758)
Pieris napi or Pieris rapae
Beetles were also found.
Cerambycidae:
Acanthocinus griseus (Fabricius, 1792)
Acanthocinus aedilis (Linnaeus, 1758)
Monochamus sutor (Linnaeus, 1758)
Monochamus galloprovincialis (Olivier, 1795)
Rhagium inquisitor (Linnaeus, 1758)
Rhagium (Megarhagium) mordax (DeGeer, 1775)
Spondylis buprestoides (Linnaeus, 1758)
Aegomorphus s.p.
Xylotrechus rusticus (Linnaeus, 1758)
First collected by me in this forest :
!Plagionotus detritus (Linnaeus, 1758)!
!Phymatodes testaceus (Linnaeus, 1758)!
Buprestidae:
Melanophila acuminata (Degeer, 1774)
I didn't take any photos, so I offer only 2 photos:
1) Aphantopus hyperantus snuggled up on the little finger of his right hand (while he was filming with his left)
2) Actually for the sake of whom I should have gone there yesterday.

This post was edited by vasiliy-feoktistov - 21.06.2012 08: 02

Pictures:

1.jpg — (142.68 k)


2.jpg — (145.26к)

The widespread deforestation of trees along power lines gave me a pleasant surprise this year. For three days: 19.05.12; 12.06.12 and 17.06.12 in the vicinity of the village Lyubuchany Chekhov district of the Moscow region collected 28 species of barbel and three species of goldenrod.

Rhagium mordax De Geer, 1775 on birch logs
Rhagium inquisitor Linnaeus, 1758 isolated on spruce logs
Dinoptera collaris Linnaeus, 1758 on umbrella
flowers Leptura quadrifasciata Linnaeus, 1758 on black currant and umbrella flowers
Leptura annularis Fabricius, 1801 on umbrella flowers
Leptura aethiops Poda, 1761 isolated on birch logs
Anastrangalia sanguinolenta Linnaeus, 1761 on umbrella
flowers Stenurella melanura Linnaeus, 1758 on umbrella
flowers Alosterna tabacicolor De Geer, 1775 on umbrella
flowers Paracorymbia maculicornis Degeer, 1775 on umbrella
flowers Molorchus minor Linnaeus, 1758 on a fallen spruce trunk
Xylotrechus rusticus Linnaeus, 1758 a lot on birch logs
Plagionotus arcuatus Linnaeus, 1758 two males and a female on oak logs 15 cm in diameter
Plagionotus detritus Linnaeus, 1758 two males and a female on an oak log about 70 cm
in diameter Mesosa myops Dalman, 1817 many on oak logs
Monochamus sutor (Linnaeus, 1758) two males on spruce logs
Monochamus urussovi (Fischer von Waldheim, 1806) male and female on spruce logs
Aegomorphus clavipes Schrank 1781 on the trunk aspens and on a pine branch
Acanthocinus aedilis Linnaeus, 1758 on pine logs
Acanthocinus griseus Fabricius, 1792 on a fallen spruce trunk
Tetrops praeustus Linnaeus, 1758 on plum and rosehip leaves
Saperda scalaris Linnaeus, 1758 on oak logs
Agapanthia villosoviridescens De Geer, 1775 on wormwood
Agapanthia (Smaragdula) intermedia Ganglbauer, 1883 mowing on the slope of a forest ravine with the presence of Knautia arvensis
Phytoecia nigricornis Fabricius, 1781 isolated on
a jasmine bush Ropalopus macropus Germar, 1824 on birch logs
Callidium aeneum De Geer, 1775 isolated on a fallen spruce trunk
Callidium violaceum Linnaeus, 1758 many on spruce and pine logs

Anthaxia quadripunctata Linnaeus, 1758 on flowers
of Phaenops cyanea Fabricius, 1775 on pine logs
Chrysobothris affinis Fabricius, 1794 on aspen logs

Pictures:

IMG_520311.jpg — (278.99к)


IMG_521311.jpg — (216.8к)


IMG_645411.jpg — (264.77к)


IMG_645911.jpg — (247.91к)


P1010317.jpg — (89.1к)


Acanthocinus_aedilis_Linnaeus__1758_.jpg — (236.79к)


Acanthocinus_griseus_Fabricius__1792.jpg — (212к)


Aegomorphus_clavipes_Schrank_1781.jpg — (245.5к)


Agapanthia_intermedia_Ganglbauer__1883.jpg — (133.1к)


Callidium_aeneum_De_Geer__1775.jpg — (132.12к)


IMG_647411.jpg — (1.06мб)

Mesosa myops Dalman, 1817

Monochamus sutor Linnaeus, 1758

Monochamus urussovi Fischer von Waldheim, 1806

Plagionotus arcuatus Linnaeus, 1758


Plagionotus detritus Linnaeus, 1758

Rhagium inquisitor Linnaeus, 1758

Ropalopus macropus Germar, 1824


Saperda scalaris Linnaeus, 1758

Xylotrechus rusticus Linnaeus, 1758

A small selection of photos from the excursion on June 22, 2012 along the power line glade (which is located north of the Moscow-Kazan railway on the Khripan - Donino stage), and the surrounding forests (including roads, edges and the upper swamp).

Out of the picture: Maxim with a net and Vitaly with a camera are met. A pleasant introduction. Ragias (inquisitor and mordax) are mainly found on flowers (occasionally on logs and stumps), monohamuses (galloprovincialis and sutor), xylotrechus rusticus, other barbels and goldenrods at least three species have not yet been identified. 1 specimen of daphne (male) was taken on the road between the power line clearing and the peat bog. If we also recall the specimen that T. Macroglossum recently picked up on the same power line much to the west (at the Torbeevo - Ravine longitude), we can conclude that the view from the east (the northernmost one, where I noted it for a long time, several kilometers north of Misheron) has moved strongly towards Moscow. I don't know yet if there is such a noticeable advance from the south-east, where there is a fairly stable population in the vicinity of Beloomut. But the number that Daphne showed in the last weekend in Tugolesye (Boldyrev, Volkov, Elez toured), has not yet happened at other points in the Moscow Region.

Bottom line: among the satyrs (in the old way) were maera, hyperantus, glycerion, russiae (one male). Of the nymphalids, admiral (one is not ragged, but flown), xanthomelas (many), selene, ino, daphne (single), aquilonaris, lathonia, paphia (rare, only males), aglaja, ilia (many), populi (one female), urticae (single), xanthomelas (very common), c-album (rare), aurinia (rare). aurelia (singular), athalia. From whiteflies-hawthorn (a lot), turnip (single). One female alexis and one male argus were found to be reliable among pigeons; probable (not considered in close proximity) one copy each - allous and a male amanda. Of the fatheads-Venatus and single Morpheus. Only papilionaria, clathrata, brunneata (on the peat bog), atrata, and prunaria are reliable moth species. Nothing from the scoops at all (by the way, finally not a single instance of glyphica was found). Of the female bears, sannio females are rare. Among lichens, mesomella is rare.

This post was edited by A. J. Elez - 22.06.2012 22: 46

Pictures:

IMG_1497.jpg — (1.69мб)


IMG_1498.jpg — (1.94мб)


IMG_1492.jpg — (2.68мб)


IMG_1487.jpg — (2.8мб)


IMG_1484.jpg — (2.74мб)


IMG_1501.jpg — (2.77мб)


IMG_1502.jpg — (2.16мб)


IMG_1504.jpg — (1.91мб)


IMG_1508.jpg — (1.89мб)


IMG_1515.jpg — (2.2мб)


IMG_1532.jpg — (1.96мб)


IMG_1534.jpg — (1.92мб)


IMG_1540.jpg — (1.81 mb)


IMG_1517.jpg — (1.61мб)

To the previous report by A. Y. Elez. Photo by Maxim and Vitaly Gumenyuk. Khripan, glade, April 2012.

Pictures:

_______.JPG — (633.75к)

And one more addition to the report on Khripani on June 22.
Monochamus urussovi
Carilia virginea
Pachyta quadrimaculata
Leptura quadrifasciata
Acanthocinus aedilis
Acanthocinus griseus
Aegomorphus clavipes
Saperda perforata
Cetonia aurata
Oxythyrea funesta
Thanasimus formicarius
Phaenops cyanea
Agrilus sp.

Moscow Region, Sergiev Posad district, Zolototilovo village

Pictures:

2306112b.jpg — (662.19к)


2306112c.jpg — (572.27к)

Moscow Region, Sergiev Posad district, Zolototilovo village

And what is the selected barbel assembled on?

And what is the selected barbel assembled on?

Clytus arietis Linnaeus, 1758? I was also surprised: I never found it here. In theory, many deciduous trees should meet. On umbrella flowers, more is likely. But quite uncharacteristic for MO kind of like?

And what is the selected barbel assembled on?

On a lying oak log, he ran around like a madman.

June 24, 2012, excursion to the forest area north of the Khripan - 41st km stretch of the Kazanskaya railway, Ramenskiy district of the Moscow region. All day long it was completely cloudy, with drizzling rain beginning to fall every now and then until the beginning of the third day, only in the evening the sun began to look out rarely and very briefly. The main purpose of the tour is to find two new clearings and a riding swamp. Two clearings were found, as well as a high swamp with wild rosemary, cranberries, fluff, marsh myrtle, etc., with three ponds, two of which - with a snow-white water lily. Unfortunately, blueberries were not found, although there are enough blueberries nearby in another high swamp, which is an order of magnitude smaller. Argus is not numerous in the newly discovered swamp, selene and brunneata are common, and aquilonaris is abundant. Cranberries grow throughout the entire area of the swamp, except for dry manes.

Pictures:

IMG_1541.jpg — (2.16 mb)


IMG_1543.jpg — (3.43мб)


IMG_1547.jpg — (2.17мб)


IMG_1565.jpg — (1.78мб)


IMG_1556.jpg — (4.66мб)


IMG_1566.jpg — (2.75мб)


IMG_1567.jpg — (2.55мб)


IMG_1569.jpg — (2.07мб)


IMG_1570.jpg — (1.92 mb)


IMG_1581.jpg — (1.94 mb)


IMG_1587.jpg — (3.96мб)


IMG_1589.jpg — (2.76 mb)


IMG_1592.jpg — (4.23мб)


IMG_1593.jpg — (2мб)


IMG_1594.jpg — (2.06мб)


IMG_1606.jpg — (2мб)


IMG_1608.jpg — (1.88мб)


IMG_1609.jpg — (5.36мб)


IMG_1610.jpg — (4.21мб)

MO, Ramenskiy district, plat district. Khripan, June 25
From butterflies among others:
brenthisdaphne
Apatura ilia female
Argynnis paphia female

and beetles


This post was edited by Sungaya - 25.06.2012 23: 45

MO, Ramenskiy district, plat district. Khripan, June 25
From butterflies among others:
brenthisdaphne
Apatura ilia female
Argynnis paphia female

and beetles

The best bug - right in the bottom row: barbel menezia

The best bug is the right one in the bottom row: Menezia's barbel

Not only him: nearby, to the left most likely Callidium (Palaeocallidium) coriaceum (Paykull, 1800) is also a good beetle here. Also, this is an isolated one, I found it on the fir trees this year. Year 1.

Not only him: nearby, to the left most likely Callidium (Palaeocallidium) coriaceum (Paykull, 1800) is also a good beetle here. Also, this is an isolated one, I found it on the fir trees this year. The year is crazy.

both were taken from a lying birch tree.
Saperda perforata quite a lot on aspens, and Saperda scalaris in the Sergiev Posad district sat on lying oaks, and in Khripani I didn't understand what - they flew from aspens to birches and back.
By the way, about these two Saperda question: both species have individuals with green and gray color. Is this a sex trait or a non-sex-related variation?

both were taken from a lying birch tree.
Saperda perforata quite a lot on aspens, and Saperda scalaris in the Sergiev Posad district sat on lying oaks, and in Khripani I didn't understand what - they flew from aspens to birches and back.
By the way, about these two Saperda question: both species have individuals with green and gray color. Is this a sex trait or a non-sex-related variation?

These Saperda often have gray individuals: this is normal, or maybe they are simply under-colored. This is not a sexual trait in any way.
S. perforata is also found on aspen and sometimes on poplar. S. scalaris on oaks all the time.
But the black barbel should be larger: if on a birch tree, then Ropalopus macropus can easily be (seen on the same clearing only closer to Moscow), and not the one that I assumed.