All comments on Insecta.pro, except for the technical ones
Community and Forum → All comments feed
All the latest comments on topics, photos and species on the site in reverse chronological order.
Show: All comments in a row. All comments, except for the technical ones.
Pages: 1 ...92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100... 218
A thumbnail could be placed by the Macrochilo genus to indicate that different species are shown.
A thumbnail could be placed for the Arctiinae subfamily to indicate that different species are shown.
A thumbnail could be placed on top to indicate that several species are shown.
It is important to emphasize that only the lower species is Sauritinia concisa.
It is important to emphasize that only the upper species is Cresera hieroglyphica.
I think this is complana.
Alexander indicating incorrect determination on the page a particular photo, then much easier to correct the error. :)
Moved this so far (tentatively identified). Kind of hard are they all. The only image on the web (save this one) is http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=257435
up
Some weird bug: after having moved back from confidently identified to tentatively identified the moth lost in the section of comments to the photo. Thus upped not to have it lost.
Severe stare )
I try to shoot specimens in black and white backgrounds, include ruler not always. I've got as well these in the white background with no ruler.
Time to separate them in some special section in the Gallery :) Not to add the not identified section.
The date isn't noticed which is bad. Suppose it's the same butterfly http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/26975 Or shot at the same time :)
Just moved this out of the admin panel. Guys, let's not note genus on upload if you don't know species. In such cases upload just as it is, with no names.
Right, didn't read till the end. This one is in synonyms there :)
Subspecies may be added by the author him/herself in the personal account.
Alexandr, why don't you identify yourself? You already put this species here.
Andrey, thanks for the confirmation, these two pics are linked :)
thanks a lot
Heliconius cydno f1 х Heliconius melpomene f1
Here at all seven (Antarctica can be excluded: insects are not compatible with it in general): http://big-archive.ru/geography/basis_of_common_geography/79.php the remaining six on the website. Let's leave it at that. Why split hairs and invent some kind of gag? There are many other, more relevant to current affairs :)
Vida called Lasiocampa eversmann l does not exist. The correct name Lasiocampa eversmann i (page here http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/6275). Double. It should be deleted.
thanks a lot for confirming my identification; greatly appreciate
Thank you!
Thanks for all your very fast help in identifying the species.
Stas is what you unsubscribe?
Andrey, I met such names only once on some trade website, I mean gahua and phadena, and gahua/phadena for blue-brown variation. This is wrong. I've got 6 differently coloured cisseis, some of which are mixed, gahua or phanodemus. Here's some info from other sources: Morpho cisseis C. Felder & R. Felder, 1860 TL: Brazil (Am) Morpho cisseis cisseis C. Felder & R. Felder, 1860 TL: Brazil (Am) ...
The Saint-Petersburg Ecology and Biology Centre “Krestovsky Island” bestows Alexey Kupriyanov Entomology Club that offers entomology classes for juniors and seniors. Alexey Kupriyanov graduated from the Saint Petersburg State University, the Biology Department (1992), he's a candidate in biological sciences. He continued his work in the alma mater as a teacher in the Zoology Department, ...
And in Seitz is. A modern bases, something not found.
Yes, some addition also. Here is completely another specimen http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/26762, of better quality than this one http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/2952 which I think should be deleted. I'd like to correct my mistakes. Pity have no authority to delete or change.
Well then move that back... Two opinions alike :)
Andrey, those are synonyms, please correspond your IDs with species names here. :)
Hello!You should post at this thread: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=228188
Thank you, greatly appreciate it!
Thank you all guys for identifying and or confirming the identification of all the species I recently posted. This helps a lot to a hobbyist like me.
Supposed Appias drusilla, better to wait for the underside though.
Looks like Heliconius cydno f3 х Heliconius melpomene f3
Looks like Heliconius cydno f2 х Heliconius melpomene f1
The moderator interface are done so the new phase is getting started, formalization of the species features. Now only me and Sergey Kotov are authorized to formalize those, later other moderators will get involved. As any new thing, this may have some more bugs so if any of you notice something inappropriate, please don't pass by silently, comment species pages where formalization is buggy or ...
Какой любопытный мужчина Ваш Coleopter!… Это что-то!Да, мы такие!!!
That's odd, I first had the same bug with that sylvia from the Philippines, then this one. Can't get.
To delete. Uploaded fresh images of this female.
This is to be deleted too due to the new uploads of pics of this specimen.
To delete. New photos of this specimen uploaded.
Well many thanks: I'm nearly nothing in them and still have plenty of not identified noctuids...
Seems everything's marked properly. What's the trouble?
They're definitely not needless. So far mark such things "hybrids" on upload, later I will easily select all of them to make some separate selection.
In the last few days the "Taxonomy" section has been updated with a better interface, new data in the daughter taxa level (family, subfamily and so on), also the "Catalogue" section now works faster and a way more proper as to the species selection, the "Community" section was divided to subsections and got more handy to use with a new option to comment superspecies taxa further to the previous ...
Forgot to add, as a background I use common Whatman paper. Not printer paper which is too blueish, just Whatman. I think this matters.
News
- 31.08.2024: Первые итоги интеграции/переноса/дублирования Молбиола и Инсекты
- 25.08.2024: Further adaptation of the website for mobile devices
- 14.08.2024: Auto applying the properties "taxon", "author of identification", "precision of identification" to all photos in a group when one of the photos is changed
New photos (15.09.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 16:38, P. Khramov: Not identified → Doleschallia bisal...
- 16:38, P. Khramov: Not identified → Nymphalis canace /...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meanwhile, at the "Reptilium"
- Interview with Alexander Zatakovoy, one of the wild Russian entomologists
- 20th International Insect Fair in Moscow (Russia, October 2023)
- Butterflies and music: An Ordinary Miracle / Butterfly Colors Song 2
