Identification of Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths)

Help with golubyankami M. O.
1.
2.
3.
Unfortunately, this undergarment could not be removed.
4.

1-Polyommatus icarus (Rottemburg, 1775), male
2, 3 - Aricia eumedon (Esper, 1780)
4 - probably female of some Plebeian species... Plebejus argyrognomon (Bergstrasser, 1779) possibly... although the shape of the spots is similar to Icarus...

This post was edited by Konung - 14.01.2008 10: 28

2, 3 - Aricia eumedon (Esper, 1780)

Are Aricia eumedon and Eumedonia eumedon the same thing or not? And then I
have Eumedonia eumedon is, and the bottom and top are different from these and these look different. Or are they variations? (These Gobian women will break the devil's leg in general )

This post was edited by bials - 14.01.2008 11: 24

Help! Did I correctly identify these as the brown Chervonets (Heodes Tityrus)?
a male?
a female?

This post was edited by bials - 14.01.2008 12: 58

2bials: Aricia eumedon = Eumedonia eumedon.
chervontsy both males heodes tityrus!

chervontsy both males of heodes tityrus!

What does the female look like? Where exactly to consider, and then in the search engines everything is in a heap and then half of the incorrectly identified ones.

At least here
http://macrolepidoptera.hu/index.php?s=4&s...d=d12&iss=0&g=1

4-probably a female of some plebeian species... Plebejus argyrognomon (Bergstrasser, 1779) possibly... although the shape of the spots is similar to Icarus...

Icarus is

4-probably a female of some plebeian species... Plebejus argyrognomon (Bergstrasser, 1779) possibly... although the shape of the spots is similar to Icarus...

P.icarus female

Please identify these fatheads and one blackie!!!

12 - Erebia ligea

Tell me PLIZ!!! Whose caterpillars are these: the Daytime Peacock's Eye or the Variegated Moth?

In my opinion mottled wings. (Actually, the caterpillars are defined in a separate topic.)

Why Amanda? Amanda is also" blue " sometimes. And also Thersite. I just don't know if there is one in the Ministry of Defense?

I've never seen such blue Amanda females in the Moscow region. But there are plenty of such females of Icarus. And the nature of the edge holes speaks for Icarus.

Tersite is not listed in the Ministry of Defense, but it is in the Tula region, literally on the border with Moscow, so it is more than likely (for the Serebryanoprudsky district). It is definitely not present in the entire region.

(Actually, the caterpillars are defined in a separate topic.)

Excuse me. I'm just hanging out between two topics, so I'm confused.
"bials" and "slipknofill" are respectively father and son, we go from the same computer but from different directories.

This post was edited by bials - 14.01.2008 21: 28

  
Tersite is not listed in the Ministry of Defense, but it is in the Tula region, literally on the border with Moscow, so it is more than likely (for the Serebryanoprudsky district). It's definitely not available in the entire region.

And I did not think that the ranges can be so limited . And all my son and I (slipknofill) pictures were taken in the Moscow Region, Ramenskoye or Odintsovo district, there are no others.

This post was edited by bials - 14.01.2008 23: 26

1, 4, 5 - Polyommatus icarus
2 - Glaucopsyche alexis
3 - Polyommatus (Plebicula) amandus
6 - Cupido (Everes) argiades

3-rather female Eumedonia eumedon

1, 4, 7, 8 - Carterocephalus silvicola
2, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11 - Ochlodes sylvanus
3-Thymelicus sp., since the female -- needs an underside.
With chernushka I find it difficult-there are only two types of them in the Moscow region, but they differ again in their underwear. E. ligea can be found everywhere in the forests, and E. aethiops can also be found on the Oka River.

1-C. palaemon (judging by the white spots)
Blackie - E. ligea (judging by the mottled fringe)

What does the female look like? Where exactly to consider, and then in the search engines everything is in a heap and then half of the incorrectly identified ones.

right here: http://macroclub.ru/glr/displayimage.php?pos=-16776

And what are these mortal remnants of a moth? I found it in Pushchino.



This post was edited by Ilya U - 15.01.2008 19: 02

Tell me who it is!!! Please!!!
(Sennitsa, Steklesnitsa, Tonkopryal), that's all I know!!!

1.
2.
3.

Tell me who it is!!! Please!!!
(Sennitsa, Steklesnitsa, Tonkopryal), that's all I know!!!

1 - Coenonympha glycerion
2 - Pennisetia hylaeiformis
3 - Triodia sylvina

And what are these mortal remnants of a moth? I found it in Pushchino.

Is this a juilo Apeira syringaria?

In my opinion, some kind of Selenia. Syringaria is different. What's the size?

It seems to fit the female A. syringaria

And what is the difference between Hepialis sylvinus L. and Triodia sylvina L., otherwise it is not clear!!!

Please identify these Mottled Birds!!!

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

And what is the difference between Hepialis sylvinus L. and Triodia sylvina L., otherwise it is not clear!!!

Hepialis sylvinus is a synonym for Triodia sylvina. The endings us and a don't matter. This has already been discussed in one of the topics.

This post was edited by AntSkr - 16.01.2008 18: 24

Please identify these Mottled Birds!!!

The last one is Zygaena filipendulae, the others are Z. lonicerae.

Tersite, not listed in the Ministry of Defense --

Dear Vladimir, where can I find this list, otherwise I really need it!!!

Dear Vladimir, where can I find this list, otherwise I really need it!!!

I'll give you a detailed answer.

In 1976, the Moscow collector MI Sirotkin (in the world, by the way, he was an officer of the SVR - who only among entomologists do not meet ) I made a list from my own collection, collections of his friends and museum materials on "macrochesoptera" of the Moscow and Kaluga regions:

Sirotkin M. I. 1976. Lepidoptera (Macrolepidoptera) Moscow and Kaluga regions. M. 167s. [Manuscript, dep. in VINITI, No. 3815-76].

This is the basic summary, which, however, was not officially published, but was deposited in the VINITI where it can still be ordered and purchased, as well as other deposited works.

In 1982, he also made the first supplement to it:

Sirotkin M. I. 1982. Lepidoptera (Macrolepidoptera) Moscow and Kaluga regions of the RSFSR. I-th supplement (for 1975-1981 incl.). Moscow, 18 p. [Manuscript, dep. in VINITI, No. 2545-82].

And in 1986, he did publish an extract in the Entomological Review-a list of these works, in which many specific data of finds are missing:

Sirotkin M. I. List of lepidoptera (Macrolepidoptera) Moscow and Kaluga regions // Entomological review. 1986. Vol. 65, issue no. 2. pp. 318-358.

There are scans of this article on the Internet right here.

And in 2000, L. N. Solntsev compiled the second supplement:

Solntsev L. N. 2000. Lepidoptera (Macrolepidoptera) Moscow and Kaluga regions. II-e supplement (for 1982-1999, incl.). Moscow, 18 p. [Manuscript, dep. in VINITI, No. 1460-B00].

It's on the Internet here.

Since then, there have only been short reports on individual species found.

I would like to draw your attention to the fact that the names in these lists are completely old and unusable at the present time. Synonymy will help you find out the almighty Google

This post was edited by kotbegemot - 16.01.2008 19: 53

Many thanks Vladimir for the detailed answer!!!

Please identify these cute butterflies! The second one, in my opinion, is similar in shape to Calothysanis amata L., but I haven't seen it in books!!!!!

1.

2.

3.

4.

Slipknofill:
1 - Hyponephele lycaon (Rottemburg, 1775)
4 - Xanthorhoe ferrugata (Clerck, 1759)

Many thanks Vladimir for the detailed answer!!!

I, actually, Vlad - as Leaves, well, it's not scary

Please identify these cute butterflies! The second one, in my opinion, is similar in shape to Calothysanis amata L., but I haven't seen it in books!!!!!

It looks like this:
1 - ?Hyponephele lycaon
2 - Scopula nigropunctata
3 - Notocelia cynosbatella
4 - Xanthorhoe quadrifasciata

Slipknofill:
4 - Xanthorhoe ferrugata (Clerck, 1759)

Still, in my opinion, quadrifasciata is more like...
They are both common in MO.

I, actually, Vlad - as Leaves, well, it's not scary

I apologize!!!!
And thank you for your reply!!!!

I apologize!!!!
And thank you for your reply!!!!

Ah, bullshit

Can you still put caterpillars in this section? And then they don't want to define it there! They are silent!!!

The same people are watching the same topic

This post was edited by Bolivar - 16.01.2008 23: 18

The last one is Zygaena filipendulae, the others are Z. lonicerae.

And how did you determine from the photo that this is Z. lonicerae not Z. trifolii (just wondering)?

And how did you determine from the photo that this is Z. lonicerae not Z. trifolii (just wondering)?

And all indications of Z. trifolii for Russia are wrong, as K. A. Efetov found out-this is a Western European spring species, which probably exists in the Kaliningrad region.