Identification of Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths)

09.06.2008 13:19, aleko

9 so removed that it can be rivata

And you can still find out more precisely how rivata differs from alternata, and then I already have so many photos slapped, but I can't distinguish them in any way

09.06.2008 13:29, svm2

09.06.2008 15:00, bials

6-H. roboraria or punctinalis (size?, hard to see the marginal band)
7-most likely E. vulgata
9 so removed that it can be rivata
13-in my opinion very flown H cervinalis
18 - A anceps 20-can also be-poorly visible
21-L. thalassina

Can I do it without abbreviations? I don't always know the first words." And for the latter, the search engines do not always find what you need.

09.06.2008 15:13, svm2

09.06.2008 15:18, PG18

09.06.2008 18:57, slipknofill

COMRADES, help identify these butterflies and the caterpillar!!!

1.

2.

3.

4.

09.06.2008 19:56, bials

09.06.2008 20:13, bials

I also had my doubts about these moths. Who knows, please tell me.
1.
2.
3.

09.06.2008 22:16, Любитель

Please help with the definition. Location-African Guinea

Pictures:

01.jpg — (124.95 k)

10.06.2008 0:29, Vlad Proklov

10.06.2008 0:32, Vlad Proklov

10.06.2008 0:34, Vlad Proklov

I also had my doubts about these moths. Who knows, please tell me.

Yes All Ematurga atomaria

10.06.2008 1:06, Juglans

Bad photo, but the butterfly was sitting on the ceiling in the entrance of the house (Vladivostok, yesterday)

Pictures:

DSC_0003.JPG — (85.87к)

10.06.2008 1:20, Juglans

I apologize for putting an indefinite leaflet here, but we simply don't have any specialists. Vladivostok, flew in the entrance of the house

Pictures:

L1.jpg — (139.24 k)


L2.jpg — (60.03 k)

10.06.2008 1:37, Vlad Proklov

10.06.2008 8:19, svm2

10.06.2008 11:55, PG18

10.06.2008 15:40, kut

Hello, here is this common butterfly-Polyommatus semiargus ?
South of the Moscow region. 6.6.8. Thank you

10.06.2008 15:50, RippeR

10.06.2008 19:09, Vlad Proklov

10.06.2008 19:19, bials

Help with the definition . Moscow, Izmailovsky Park, today.
1.
2.
3.
4.

10.06.2008 19:26, Vlad Proklov

10.06.2008 20:33, bials

10.06.2008 21:46, clanis

11.06.2008 1:47, RippeR

11.06.2008 1:59, Vlad Proklov

kotbegemot:
something else I haven't heard about.. This is xde so and from what time?
I don't like this classification - what do genitals say?

Yes, more than ten years ago-I first saw such a system in" The Lepidoptera of Europe " edited by Karsholt-Razowski. In Europe, this is now the only way they are considered-enlarged genera.
Russia, however, is still a sort of Higgins-Riley Nature Reserve - but this is already its problem...

Yes - and in the genitals, everyone sees what they want - for someone the glass is half empty, for someone half full. Besides, they're not the same genitals

This post was edited by kotbegemot - 11.06.2008 02: 02

11.06.2008 6:20, bora

to kotbegemot

"Yes, more than ten years ago-I first saw such a system in" The Lepidoptera of Europe " edited by Karsholt-Razowski. In Europe, this is now the only way they are considered-enlarged genera.
Russia, however, is still a sort of Higgins-Riley Nature Reserve - but this is already its problem...

Yes - and in the genitals, everyone sees what they want - for someone the glass is half empty, for someone half full. Besides, they're not the same genitals"

Partly true. Genitals, sometimes fail. And the system of genera enlargement is certainly justified (O. Kudrna was actively engaged in this in the mid-90s). Only the association should be reviewed again. In 2003, M. Wiemers defended his dissertation on the study of phylogeny using mitochondrial (CO1) and nuclear (intron ITS2) genes. It turned out that morpho-genital methods often do not reflect genetic kinship.
Separate branches (genera) are Polyommatus (which apparently includes in the rank of subgenera Agrodiaetus, Polyommatus proper, Meleageria, Plebicula, Neolysandra), as well as the genera Aricia, Cyaniris, Eumedon, Agriades, Vacciniina, but Lysandra turned out to be related to Plebeius argus and fell out of Polyommatus.

This post was edited by bora - 11.06.2008 06: 31

Pictures:

__________Polyommatinae.jpg — (133.4 k)

11.06.2008 6:53, Juglans

11.06.2008 14:41, Alexander Zarodov

Hello everyone

To clear your conscience, so to speak... All C. croceus?
Photographed in Greece in May.

11.06.2008 19:02, PG18

Everything! The images are good

11.06.2008 22:25, RippeR

kotbegemot, bora:
it's beautiful, of course, but I'm for Russia! The glass is half full for me

Double A:
The pictures are really impressive!!

11.06.2008 22:31, Ilia Ustiantcev

Help identify moths. Moscow Region, Solnechnogorsk district.
1.Ectropis crepuscularia?
2.
Cepphis advenaria?
3.Jodis lactearia?
4.Flocks flying!!!
5.Macaria alternata?
6.
7.Scopula immorata?

11.06.2008 23:04, Alexander Zarodov

PG18, RippeR-thank you for evaluating your photos, but it's always better when you know exactly what you've photographed

Here's another question. I found one among the ikaruses, and it is suspected that it is thersites. Am I right? Filmed in the same place, in Greece.



This post was edited by Double A - 11.06.2008 23: 06

11.06.2008 23:31, Kharkovbut

12.06.2008 8:35, svm2

13.06.2008 0:06, RippeR

Double A:
most likely tormented.. Probably some local subspecies, and then the color of it is some strange

13.06.2008 22:10, PG18

13.06.2008 22:13, PG18

Double A:
most likely tormented.. Probably some local subspecies, but the color of it is some strange

This is how light falls on the scales, at a very sharp angle to the wing plane

14.06.2008 10:53, KingSnake

What kind of view? Please help me identify it.

Pictures:

P1050782.jpg — (135.34к)

15.06.2008 11:32, Ilia Ustiantcev

A lot of things. Orekhovo-Zuyevsky district of Moscow region, this weekend.
Moths.
1.Jodis sp.?
2.
3.Macaria alternata?
4.
5.Scopula immorata?
6.Is it finally ferrugata?!
7.8
.At least not alternata!
9.This one is from Moscow. Rhinoprora rectangulata?
Scoops.
1.Elaphria venustula?
Ognevki.
1.Aphomia sociella?
2.
3.Perinephela lancealis?
Moths.
1.From Moscow. Monopis sp.?
2.
3.Monopis monachella?
4.5.6

.
Other services.
Caterpillar(poplar or aspen):

Golubyanka. Undergarments without red spots, very small. It seems to me either semiargus, which explains the blue color, or minimus, which explains the size with Idaea seriata. Still, who? If argiades happens to be without red spots on his underparts, perhaps he is?

And hawk moth. According to the KKMO, tityus is found in the area, but this species is more similar to fuciformis...

And what about the other moth from the previous post?

This post was edited by Ilya U-07.07.2008 08: 35