Lycaenidae

For example, Polyommatus celina was "unearthed" by Vimers, Vodolazhsky and Stradomsky,

He knew everything, Valentine. He receives my articles regularly. It's not even that, it's just that he behaved completely unethically in a number of places. For example, Polyommatus celina was "unearthed"by Vimers, Vodolazhsky, and Stradomsky, and for some reason he refers to the subsequent work of Dinca et al 2011, in which the authors refer to us. Next, the Eros system: Three or four years ago, Chikolovets and I had a long e-mail exchange about the status of Eroides, etc. Now he gives us our system of eros, but without the slightest reference to our work with Vimers.

Polyommatus celina isn't it from Tunisia???

I suggest simply not to consider Chikolovets ' book as a scientific work

So there are good determinants, there are bad ones, and there are Chikolovets.
Someone likes and uses them.

Pictures are being watched

   Some films are good, some are bad, and some are Indian.
So there are good determinants, there are bad ones, and there are Chikolovets.
Someone likes and uses them. They don't suit me and I don't use them.
The only bad thing is that these books are well known in Europe and they are used to judge the level of our science.
Collectors primarily purchase atlases, not catalogues.

Yes, having looked at this book quite quickly so far, I can confirm that it is completely useless and even harmful to the knowledge of the fauna of Europe, especially the Eastern one. The author compiled some innovations without any understanding, with gross errors and, of course, without any references to sources. This is an unscrupulous and illiterate compilation that can only disorient the untrained reader.

Finally, I began to straighten out the material that had been waiting in the wings for almost 15 years. Unfortunately, this had a negative impact on the quality of the crackdown.

Callophrys avis

[attachmentid()=134449]

[attachmentid()=134450]

Here's a look at an interesting photo of nerds who have found it - and the discussion is very interesting...

http://forum.plantarium.ru/viewtopic.php?pid=117086#p117086

Are your genitals typical? Are they developing on Sedum album too?

Population of S. orion in the delta of the The Don is characterized by the following parameters: very large size (like Icarus), the presence of red-brick holes in the marginal pattern of the top of the hind wings, and monovolticity. Has anyone ever met such people?

Nizhny Novgorod ones are the same

And in the south, the orions are small, dim, and bivoltine. And without the red holes on top.

  
When does a single generation fly in the Don Delta? In the spring?

And one of the original descriptions.