E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Hesperiidae

Community and ForumInsects imagesHesperiidae

Pages: 1 ...6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14... 16

06.01.2011 11:42, Yakovlev

E. popoviana from St. Mongolia

Pictures:
picture: P1010407.JPG
P1010407.JPG — (197.11к)

picture: P1010410.JPG
P1010410.JPG — (174.86к)

Likes: 6

14.01.2011 18:46, Krupskyi

Can no one help you understand the pyrguses? I really hope for an answer. You are welcome.

01.02.2011 15:00, Valentinus

Dear colleagues!
Does anyone have any observations on thickhead mating?
How do males use androconial scales?
Прочитал у Вагнера (Wagner, 2006) по спариванию P. alveus: "Das Weibchen strich dabei mit seinen Hinterbeinen auch über die Abdomenspitze des Männchens, wo sich Dufthaarbüschel befinden". I understood it as: The female rubs her hind legs along the tip of the male's abdomen, where the androconial scales are located.
Maybe someone has seen something similar?

01.02.2011 15:18, okoem

Does anyone have any observations on thickhead mating?

Judging by the fact that I have observed the mating of numerous Pyrgus thickheads in the Crimea only once, I got the impression that Crimean pyrgus have learned to reproduce without mating. confused.gif
I watched the mating of Pyrgus cinarae - they sat quietly.

01.02.2011 16:21, Valentinus

Judging by the fact that I have observed the mating of numerous Pyrgus thickheads in the Crimea only once, I got the impression that Crimean pyrgus have learned to reproduce without mating. confused.gif
I watched the mating of Pyrgus cinarae - they sat quietly.

Did you see what happened before copulation?
The fact that they sit quietly afterward is understandable. There already need to look at the faces. jump.gif

01.02.2011 18:10, Kharkovbut

Barry and I once watched malvae mate. Here are barry's pictures:

http://kharkov.naturalist.su/gallery/show_...p?imageid=13262
http://kharkov.naturalist.su/gallery/show_...p?imageid=13263
http://kharkov.naturalist.su/gallery/show_...p?imageid=13264

However, I do not recall anything like what Wagner writes. The usual behavior, in general: the male climbed belly to the female... But the last image shows" swollen " androconial bundles on the male's legs.

By the way, I thought that androconia are found in the costal fold of the forewing and on the legs. At the end of the abdomen, too?

I also once observed E. tages mating. They also sat quietly (already). smile.gif

Indeed, the spectacle is not often seen.

01.02.2011 18:37, okoem

Did you see what happened before copulation?

Alas, no.

01.02.2011 19:59, Valentinus

Barry and I once watched malvae mate. Here are barry's pictures:

http://kharkov.naturalist.su/gallery/show_...p?imageid=13262
http://kharkov.naturalist.su/gallery/show_...p?imageid=13263
http://kharkov.naturalist.su/gallery/show_...p?imageid=13264

However, I do not recall anything like what Wagner writes. The usual behavior, in general: the male climbed belly to the female... But the last image shows" swollen " androconial bundles on the male's legs.

By the way, I thought that androconia are found in the costal fold of the forewing and on the legs. At the end of the abdomen, too?

I also once observed E. tages mating. They also sat quietly (already). smile.gif

Indeed, the spectacle is not often seen.

Great and very informative pictures, especially the last one. It is seen that the male opens androconia on the lower legs of the hind legs before copulation, making it clear to the female that it is his own.
I looked through my collection of thickheads and it turned out that the androconial fold on the costal edge of the forewing is present in several genera: Erynnis, Carcharodus,Muschampia,Pyrgus. Androconial tufts on the lower legs of the hind legs are found only in Pyrgus. We can say that they are the most odorous thickheads. They have both on their wings and on their legs. umnik.gif
I found absolutely no androconium in Spialia, Heteropterus, and Carterocephalus. confused.gif
Wagner's phrase about odorous scales on the tip of the male's abdomen will probably be left in great doubt. He also wrote that the female sits on the male before mating, and then rubs her paws... NADA PRAVERAT beer.gif

01.02.2011 20:12, Kharkovbut

Androconial tufts on the lower legs of the hind legs are found only in Pyrgus.
...as well as many other members of the subfamily Pyrginae from other regions. Are you sure Tages doesn't have one?" Right here

http://butterfliesofamerica.com/imagehtmls...rolinskiy_i.htm

you can see my picture of E. icelus (North America) - the androconal bundles are clearly visible.

I found absolutely no androconium in Spialia, Heteropterus, and Carterocephalus.
Yes, Spialia do not have a costal fold - something of an exception. Well, the others are from a different subfamily, and the demand is different from them. wink.gif

Wagner's phrase about odorous scales on the tip of the male's abdomen will probably be left in great doubt. He also wrote that the female sits on the male before mating, and then rubs her paws... NADA PRAVERYAT beer.gif
There is, of course, a certain bundle of scales/hairs. But I don't know how androconial it is.

01.02.2011 20:20, Kharkovbut

PS: I looked at De Jong's work on Palearctic Pyrgus: tufts on the hind legs and costal fold are mentioned, but not a word about the tip of the abdomen. There, by the way, it is said that the costal fold in some African spialia is still there.
Likes: 1

01.02.2011 21:03, Valentinus

[quote=Kharkovbut,01.02.2011 21:12]

01.02.2011 22:05, Kharkovbut

Once again I looked at tagesov, well, there are no androconia on the shins, but on your North American-there is, a riddle!!!
Apparently, not such a mystery. Here after all at spialy too: at one there is a costal fold, at other types-is not present, and nothing, live. smile.gif

04.02.2011 9:29, Valentinus

Dear connoisseurs of thickheads!
Have any of you observed how disturbed fatheads behave when they copulate? Who is carrying a partner-male or female?
This may be specific to the genus or to the entire family.
I myself have observed and filmed copulating fatheads several times, but I couldn't scare them off. Now I regret it. wall.gif
Ochlodes sylvanus. 9.07.2009, Dagestan, Bogos ridge, vicinity of the village of Genukh, 2200 m above sea level.
picture: Ochlodes_sylvanus.jpg
Carcharodus orientalis. 8.07.2009, Dagestan, south of the Bogos ridge, near the village of Genukh, 2200 m above sea level
picture: Carcharodus_orientalis.jpg
Likes: 1

04.02.2011 16:49, Kharkovbut

In lineola, the female bore the male. Here it is... well, not that it is visible, but it is guessed:

http://kharkovbut.narod.ru/lineola.html
Likes: 2

04.02.2011 21:10, Valentinus

In lineola, the female bore the male. Here it is... well, not that it is visible, but it is guessed:

http://kharkovbut.narod.ru/lineola.html

There is another interesting picture in your gallery, namely the egg-laying process of Thymelicus lineola. It is seen that the female lays an egg on a flat, dry stalk. I have never seen this, but it has been known in the literature that females lay their eggs individually on the underside of a fork in the leaves of cereals (Bellman, 2003). shuffle.gif

04.02.2011 21:21, Valentinus

Another fascinating aspect of the biology of fathead behavior is the resting position.

June 12, 2010, North Caucasus, Baksan Gorge, near the village of Bylym.
picture: Carcharodus_lavatherae.jpg

On the website of Kharkiv entomologists in the gallery on Carcharodus alceae (picture of Boris Loboda) - a very similar pose! smile.gif

Interestingly, such poses are characteristic only for the genus Carcharodus? confused.gif
Likes: 1

04.02.2011 21:24, Kharkovbut

Interestingly, such poses are characteristic only for the genus Carcharodus? confused.gif
I've never seen anyone else in this position...

04.02.2011 21:32, Kharkovbut

It is seen that the female lays an egg on a flat, dry stalk.
Here is another frame (another copy). 6 / VII / 2009, Kharkiv region, Dergachevsky district.

This post was edited by Kharkovbut-04.02.2011 21: 49

Pictures:
картинка: Th._lineola__fm___7_06_2009__Kh__Derg__Gavrilovka.jpg
Th._lineola__fm___7_06_2009__Kh__Derg__Gavrilovka.jpg — (167.14к)

Likes: 1

04.02.2011 21:37, okoem

Interestingly, such poses are characteristic only for the genus Carcharodus? confused.gif

I've only seen them.
April 25, 2010, Crimea, Tepe-Kermen.
picture: 20100425_144243.jpg
Likes: 3

05.02.2011 13:42, introvert

resting position

It's more like the sexual behavior of a male.

05.02.2011 16:57, Valentinus

It's more like the sexual behavior of a male.

No, no, this is exactly the resting position. In my opinion, on the website of Vladimir Savchuk "Butterflies of the Crimea" there is a female in a similar position. smile.gif

05.02.2011 17:56, Valentinus

Dear colleagues! mol.gif
What do you think about the status of Muschampia proto-M. proteides?
Here are butterflies from Dagestan.
Male: 17.07.2008, Dagestan, 15 km west of Makhachkala, Sarykum. (From the caterpillar)/Female: 19.07.2010, ibid. (From caterpillar)picture: Muschampia_proto_proteides.jpg
Based on the book "Mace-whiskered Lepidoptera". Europe " (Lvovsky and Morgun, 2007) M. proteides lives in the Crimea and in the South of Russia, which does not differ from M. proto in genitalia, but differs in a lighter wing color.
In the butterflies of Turkey (Hesselbarth et al., 1995), the authors write that both taxa live there, and in some places they are sympatric. Here is an illustration:picture: DSC09569.JPG
picture: DSC09568.JPG

On the other hand, the essay by A. L. Devyatkin (Tuzov et al., 1997) provides only Muschampia proto for the territory of the former USSR. P. Gorbunov (2001) agrees with this position.
What are your opinions? confused.gif
Likes: 2

05.02.2011 18:00, Vlad Proklov

Dear colleagues! mol.gif
What do you think about the status of Muschampia proto-M. proteides?
[...]
What are your opinions? confused.gif

My Portuguese specimens are quite light, closer to the proteides phenotype.
Likes: 1

05.02.2011 18:06, Kharkovbut

What do you think about the status of Muschampia proto-M. proteides?
Good, correct question. smile.gif As for our population, so far I have personally trusted I. G. Plyushch, who not only in publications, but also in conversation confirmed the opinion that in the East. Europe is home to proteides. However, I would like to confirm this. I wish I had some material on hand right now.

Does Hasselbart draw genitals in his book?
Likes: 2

05.02.2011 19:30, palvasru4ko

Good, correct question. [...]


Here is the "beast" from the Crimea:
picture: _____2.jpg
Likes: 4

05.02.2011 21:38, Valentinus

My Portuguese specimens are quite light, closer to the proteides phenotype.

I don't understand anything. Portugal-type locality for M. proto!
Can't you see these butterflies?
Likes: 1

05.02.2011 21:43, bora

Likes: 2

05.02.2011 21:46, Valentinus

  
Does Hasselbart draw genitals in his book?

It was a big disappointment to me that Hesselbart's book didn't have any drawings of genitals at all. Such a wonderful publication... weep.gif
One can feel the German school of Staudinger, who, as is well known, did not recognize this shameful method of distinguishing species.
Likes: 1

05.02.2011 21:56, bora

But the unlit Rostov"beast"

Pictures:
picture: Muschampia.jpg
Muschampia.jpg — (93.66к)

Likes: 3

05.02.2011 22:02, Kharkovbut

Our, IMHO, some intermediate ones: http://kharkovbut.narod.ru/proteides.html

Pictures:
picture: S_proteides_m_7_25_2006_Kharkov_Efr.JPG
S_proteides_m_7_25_2006_Kharkov_Efr.JPG — (80.75к)

picture: S_proteides_m_un_8_02_2006_Kharkov_Efr.JPG
S_proteides_m_un_8_02_2006_Kharkov_Efr.JPG — (70.34к)

Likes: 3

05.02.2011 22:08, Kharkovbut

We'd have to find out the exact characteristics of the species somewhere. The Internet doesn't help yet. frown.gif

05.02.2011 22:32, bora

Muschampia proto/M. proteides are still small things.
I've always been intrigued by Muschampia tessellum - that's where the "two species"are.

Pictures:
picture: Muschampia__tessellum.jpg
Muschampia__tessellum.jpg — (228.41к)

Likes: 3

05.02.2011 22:35, bora

Yes, and their genitals, once already laid out, but I repeat for the kit

Pictures:
picture: M.tessellum.jpg
M.tessellum.jpg — (222.8к)

Likes: 5

05.02.2011 22:38, Alexandr Zhakov

confused.gif

05.02.2011 23:11, Egorus

On the 3rd page of this topic, post #145 I have the same "hilinky" ...

06.02.2011 2:16, Kharkovbut

Although I didn't find anything scientific about proto/proteides, I did look at a lot of photos taken in Turkey. IF you believe the correctness of their definition (and the correspondence of our phenotypes and theirs), then our people do not reach proteides... Although, of course, you need to check it properly.

Here you can see maps of distribution in Turkey:
http://www.adamerkelebek.org/IcerikDetay.a...tId=8&TurId=206
http://www.adamerkelebek.org/IcerikDetay.a...tId=8&TurId=207
Likes: 1

06.02.2011 2:38, Kharkovbut

Just in case, I will give drawings of genitals:

1) "proto", Southern Urals (taken from P. Gorbunov's book "The Butterflies of Russia", 2001)

2) "proteides", unknown from where (taken from the book "Bulavous Lepidoptera of Eastern Europe" by Lvovsky and Morgun).

The differences are visible though... I would prefer images from a single source. smile.gif And when you don't know where your genitals are... Yes, the difference is in the technique of drawing...

This post was edited by Kharkovbut - 06.02.2011 02: 47

Pictures:
picture: proto.JPG
proto.JPG — (67.84к)

picture: proteides.JPG
proteides.JPG — (82.54к)

Likes: 1

06.02.2011 2:42, Kharkovbut

And yet, the information about the external signs of proto in Lvovsky and Morgun causes me some confusion: a whitish background of the underside of the rear wing? significant development of whitish pollination on the upper side of the wings? In this regard, it would be interesting to see proto from the sample area! Maybe the confusion is deeper than first thought.

PS: Photos of Portuguese protos from the network generally correspond to Turkish ones. smile.gif

This post was edited by Kharkovbut - 06.02.2011 03: 06
Likes: 1

06.02.2011 9:43, Yakovlev

Proto is described by Oksenheimer. His types seem to have disappeared, and proteides is Wagner. Its types are in Vienna.
Likes: 2

06.02.2011 10:03, palvasru4ko

Proto is described by Oksenheimer. Its types seem to have disappeared [...].

I looked at the book by Nekrutenko (1985) - there proto was described by Esper in 1805. In the Korb catalog (2005) - the same Esper. Korshunov (1972), Higgins and Riley (1978), and Tuzov (1997, more precisely, Devyatkin in Tuzov et al.) - Oksenheimer, 1808.
Funny... confused.gif

Pages: 1 ...6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14... 16

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.