About tropics, merchants, and personal preferences

Any anonymity when discussing non-intimate matters smacks of g-M. Forgive me, but it's true. When I went to the forum 2 years ago, I didn't even think about being encrypted. By the way, one advocate of the purity of entomological series, the same anonymous person, when serious questions came up, sold me the material. Excellent by the way, for which I thank him very much. I don't see anything to hide Sinyaev, Moroz, Pekarsky, Udovichenko... What is the point of going to the entoforum under a mask? This is not a dating site. By the way, neologisms, the meaning of which I do not know-this is your prerogative, as well as to call people of different ages and often those who do not know you...

This is your subjective opinion. And no more than that. Take it for granted and calm down. If you want to be famous - a flag in your hands and a locomotive to meet, as they said in my troubled childhood. I like it differently

I don't think Jean Hanus ' article about Phoebe is a hack. I think after I posted it on the forum, you Vlad was among those who thanked me.
Is Bosano the ideal? I found mistakes in it, and serious ones at that. Although the books are very nice!

And -- well, in that article it was simply established what phoebus is. Botano is not ideal , but it is a very balanced assessment of the validity of numerous subspecies names, most of which are reduced to synonyms.

I suggest that you ignore messages of a clearly provacational nature.

it doesn't always work out. These provocations are for many people, including me (I repent ) as the light of a pricked DRL for different sawyers.
And the enemy, as always, is not asleep and knows our vulnerabilities.

Speaking of the definition of ENTOMOLOGIST. I don't consider myself such, because my education is different, I don't write articles, etc.I collect, yes. And what, nizia???
So, the collection is not created to be shaken over it by a stingy knight, after all. Yes, the design and order in private collections is usually better, because this is usually created with love.
Smoothly flow:
And to reproach domestic museums for the fact that the collections are poorly maintained is low, because few people will pick at them and take care of them for horseradish. This is especially true for young people today. For example, what was the post-graduate scholarship before, and what is it now.

In medicine, 3 years ago it was about 1.5 thousand rubles. All right?

This is your subjective opinion. And no more than that. Take it for granted and calm down. If you want to be famous - a flag in your hands and a locomotive to meet, as they said in my troubled childhood. I like it differently

something tells me that my childhood was very recently

Phegea is a very reputable magazine... Nice. I had a description of the subspecies Oeneis jutta akoene Belik & Yakovlev published there. I thought that the reputable journals were Fennica Entomologica or Titschkrift fur Entomologi, Shilap, Nota-if we talk about butterflies....

A lot of water has flowed since 1996, hasn't it? Isn't Willy de Prins an authority figure for you? I need to show him this post to make him laugh. In tideshrift (so it reads after all), subspecies are also not taken anymore. Try poking your head in there. Note the magazine is very liberal, and there has been some confusion with the editorial staff in the last 2 years. What else is there? Fennick's entomology? It's a good magazine, but it's positioned as a regional magazine with a focus on ecology. What does taxonomy have to do with it?

something tells me that my childhood was quite recent

Nail down what prompts. It's blatantly lying to you. Although... We're all just grown-up kids.

I don't think Jean Hanus ' article about Phoebe is a hack. I think after I posted it on the forum, you Vlad was among those who thanked me.
Is Bosano the ideal? I found mistakes in it, and serious ones at that. Although the books are very nice!

Those who don't make mistakes don't do anything. Russian folk wisdom.

Comrade "Dragon Slayer", have you read a lot of fantasy in your troubled childhood?

I'm sorry if I offended you.

I, for example, as a child Verna, .Obruchev, Darrell, Setton-Thompson, Herriot read. So the books are quite calm memories

This post was edited by Morozzz - 24.09.2010 12: 15

A lot of water has flowed since 1996, hasn't it? Isn't Willy de Prins an authority figure for you? I need to show him this post to make him laugh. In tideshrift (so it reads after all), subspecies are also not taken anymore. Try poking your head in there. Note the magazine is very liberal, and there has been some confusion with the editorial staff in the last 2 years. What else is there? Fennick's entomology? It's a good magazine, but it's positioned as a regional magazine with a focus on ecology. What does taxonomy have to do with it?

And show Yurata. Thanks for the correction, our view on the rating of magazines is somewhat different.

Comrade "Dragon Slayer", have you read a lot of fantasy in your troubled childhood?

I'm sorry if I offended you.

I, for example, as a child Verna, .Obruchev, Darrell, Setton-Thompson, Herriot read. So the books are quite calm memories

I read a lot of things, including fantasy. Versatile reading is a blessing, because it allows
you to a) write without mistakes
b) avoid tautologies
c) forms the correct writing style
d) enriches the lexicon
e) and so on, so on, so on...

Both Darrell and Seton-Thompson are among my favorites. And then there are Welskopf-Heinrich, Cooper, Curwood, Chekhov, Bulgakov, Bunin, Mandelstam, Akhmatova, Pushkin, Chernyshevsky, Alekseev and many others.

Are you the same person who recently wrote "Kiev-Tervuren" in his place of residence?

This post was edited by Yakovlev - 24.09.2010 12: 27

And show Yurata. Thanks for the correction, our view on the rating of magazines is somewhat different.

Diverges, a fact. But for the taxonomy, the magazine's rating doesn't matter at all. This is the first conclusion from the first chapter of the Code.

Are you the same person who recently wrote "Kiev-Tervuren" in his place of residence?

Does it matter? I'm a forum bot, if that's what you want. Please do not deviate from the topic of discussion.

We don't have a topic.

Topic in the title of the topic.

I read a lot of things, including fantasy. Versatile reading is a blessing, because it allows
you to a) write without mistakes
b) avoid tautologies
c) forms the correct writing style
d) enriches the lexicon
e) and so on, so on, so on...

Both Darrell and Seton-Thompson are among my favorites. And then there are Welskopf-Heinrich, Cooper, Curwood, Chekhov, Bulgakov, Bunin, Mandelstam, Akhmatova, Pushkin, Chernyshevsky, Alekseev and many others.

However, the flowery nature of your messages doesn't seem to be affected by the literature.

However, the flowery nature of your messages doesn't seem to be affected by the literature.

Excuse me?" A set of stamps received from the yard gopota?

2 Dragonsbane: Would you shell out any of your fees
Hopefully Leg. isn't there a Dragonsbane affixed?
No, well, I was just intrigued by

Does it matter? I'm a forum bot, if that's what you want. Please do not deviate from the topic of discussion.

And it does matter. Someone with the name Nosferatu about a year and a half ago strongly publicly insulted one person on the forum. This caused outrage from the audience. Then a person with the same (or almost the same) nickname, or whatever it is you have forumschikov inveterate - appeared openly and behaved quietly and normatively.
Now again an unhealthy interest in the topic of davydovi, sales, etc. with some knowledge about Belgium. If all this is one person-this is one thing, if different people, then forgive me for my suspicions.
Have you ever caught insects for money?

2 Dragonsbane: Would you shell out any of your fees
Hopefully Leg. isn't there a Dragonsbane affixed?
No, well, I was just intrigued

And for what purpose?

Excuse me?" A set of stamps received from the yard gopota?

Oh, probably Akhmatova influenced! For they've been well-read to her since childhood, I see. Since I was a child, I only know her portraits of Petrov-Vodkin and Altman, and Napelbaum's photographs.
You know, with the yard boys to talk a little (in a good way)useful for some people.

And it does matter. Someone with the name Nosferatu about a year and a half ago strongly publicly insulted one person on the forum. This caused outrage from the audience. Then a person with the same (or almost the same) nickname, or whatever it is you have forumschikov inveterate - appeared openly and behaved quietly and normatively.
Now again an unhealthy interest in the topic of davydovi, sales, etc. with some knowledge about Belgium. If all this is one person-this is one thing, if different people, then forgive me for my suspicions.
Have you ever caught insects for money?

Yes, both nicknames have infernal

And for what purpose?

And in order to bring real benefits to the forum.

This post was edited by vasiliy-feoktistov - 24.09.2010 13: 09

And the answer is to drive paratypes on bursae. That's why it's parascientific.

This is if it had already been proved that on bursa these paratypes (with or without quotation marks) are not bought by people of science (who have always been able to buy material), but by wall decorators...
Yes, form-making is widely used to throw expensive "novelties"into the market. And what, only some evil "merchants" are guilty of this (both today and in the past), and not very polished academic figures? So it is better to maintain the presumption of innocence for each specific person and discuss each case specifically. You can even create (if not yet, I don't remember exactly) a thread to discuss the validity of forms and expose linden, everyone will be very welcome. The description of the description is different, sweeping accusations are inappropriate here. As, for example, the publication of publications is different: scientific journals often publish what science then refutes (and what is sometimes launched for non-scientific reasons), so now everyone who publishes in scientific periodicals should be immediately written down as scoundrels? And mistakes are not always the result of self-interest.
Both sides are right on positive arguments, but both sides are wrong in thinking of the other side as an ideological opponent. It's time to get rid of rigor, learn to talk dialectically and not break copies on the old question of whether a glass is a drinking tool or a glass cylinder. What is needed is not a mutual exclusion of completely independent moments, but a concrete consideration of a specific case.
The word "parascientific "hardly expresses exactly what Vladislav wanted to say, it has a slightly different meaning (if at all); he himself previously used the word"anti-scientific". But I would not try to artificially collide two objectively parallel processes at all and in this context I only say: "has nothing to do with science." But every case, I repeat, would have to be proved. Taking into account, by the way, the cooling considerations that none of us will ever hear the last word in zoo systems during our lifetime, but we will watch nomenclature dances (where sometimes "paranauka"will rest) from the heart...

And it does matter. Someone with the name Nosferatu about a year and a half ago strongly publicly insulted one person on the forum. This caused outrage from the audience. Then a person with the same (or almost the same) nickname, or whatever it is you have forumschikov inveterate - appeared openly and behaved quietly and normatively.
Now again an unhealthy interest in the topic of davydovi, sales, etc. with some knowledge about Belgium. If all this is one person-this is one thing, if different people, then forgive me for my suspicions.
Have you ever caught insects for money?

If I offend someone (especially in public), please point it out to me and I will apologize. The last thing I want to do is pour shit on anyone. I don't know who Nosferatu is. A year and a half ago, I was not on this forum, and I regret the time to study it retrospectively.

I have no interest in the topic of davydovi, as well as in Davydov himself, in fact. I know its location, I've been there. Ixodic ticks are much more interesting . I initiated this skirmish only because I do not consider the discovery of this species to be something outstanding. The person was just lucky - like many people in general. Remember how an ornithopter was shot from guns at the end of the penultimate century-also a moment of luck is extremely important. In general, the taxonomy is too much built on random factors (I mean the extraction of material).

I haven't caught insects for money, and I don't intend to. Too much unstable earnings, and the size of it does not excite me.

Oh, probably Akhmatova influenced! For they've been well-read to her since childhood, I see. Since I was a child, I only know her portraits of Petrov-Vodkin and Altman, and Napelbaum's photographs.
You know, with the yard boys to talk a little (in a good way)useful for some people.

Napelbaum is good. I also talked to the yard kids . I can fully load on the hair dryer, if there are ramses. Ah cho, we didn't get caught...

"I can fully load on the hair dryer, if there are rams. Ah cho, we didn't get caught... "

Awkward. Trash.

and demostratively.

Do you lack attention from others? Can you embrace the whole forum?

This post was edited by Morozzz - 24.09.2010 13: 11

And in order to bring real benefits to the forum.

Oh, the forum as a measure of utility? Wonderful . It seemed to me that the forum is the essence of a place for communication, and you have evon as it turns out. Perhaps, I still have to scan all my books here, so that the forum will benefit, and give money?

If I offend someone (especially in public), please point it out to me and I will apologize. The last thing I want to do is pour shit on anyone. I don't know who Nosferatu is. A year and a half ago, I was not on this forum, and I regret the time to study it retrospectively.

If it was not on the forum a year and a half ago, then what is the speech

  

Do you lack attention from others? Can you embrace the whole forum?

funny. Can we arrange a flash mob?

Oh, the forum as a measure of utility? Wonderful . It seemed to me that the forum is the essence of a place for communication, and you have evon as it turns out. Perhaps, I still have to scan all my books here, so that the forum will benefit, and give money?

Many articles and monographs are published here. This is also a forum for entomologists and collectors-many of whom are far away or without money to buy books. There's no need to be nervous here. All that I could, for example, put up. Maybe someone will be interested.

Oh, the forum as a measure of utility? Wonderful . It seemed to me that the forum is the essence of a place for communication, and you have evon as it turns out. Perhaps, I still have to scan all my books here, so that the forum will benefit, and give money?

Yeah, books. Let's.

But wouldn't it turn out that you are Fabre, or Smelters, for example?
Or did Akhmatova and Mandelstam brazenly steal your intellectual property?

Many articles and monographs are published here. This is also a forum for entomologists and collectors-many of whom are far away or without money to buy books. There's no need to be nervous here. All that I could, for example, put up. Maybe someone will be interested.

Please don't confuse the concepts of "making jokes" and "being ironic". For those who are far away, FedEx will help, and for those who do not have money, find a job.

Yeah, books. Let's.

But wouldn't it turn out that you are Fabre, or Smelters, for example?
Or did Akhmatova and Mandelstam brazenly steal your intellectual property?

It won't appear. I'm Elvis.

yup, Evel Elvis.
Elvis Mandelstam

By the way, anecdote - boyan

This post was edited by Morozzz - 24.09.2010 13: 17

I am pleased to communicate here with a real connoisseur of Russian literature. I bow my knee

yup, Evel Elvis.
Elvis Mandelstam

By the way, anecdote - boyan

I didn't pretend to be new. Just by the way, I had to . Mandelstam's name was Osip, I think.

immediately visible, brand new.
What if he just feels bad that he didn't make it to the convention? (assumption   )

Who told you I didn't make it to the convention?

thank you for enlightening me.
And Elvis, probably, Presley?

thank you for enlightening me.
And Elvis, probably, Presley?

Troll, Mr. Morozzz . I will be happy to pofluzhu with you in PM, if you wish.